I have tossed this around a lot ...
henho said:
Blackjack, let me state that I only know you through the internet but I have tremendous respect for you from your writings, posts, etc. However, your die-hard loyalty to the UPA is confusing. I think it is fair to call the organization ineffective, and I don't think that resolving the myriad problems it is mired in (and that you have tried to solve personally, kudos for that) will do anything to better the otherwise miserable state of pro pool. The UPA is burying itself with small-time politics and appears to become less and less effective every year. I have read your posts expressing your viewpoint on the IPT and the UPA, but I still can't understand why the UPA deserves any poolplayer's loyalty. It seems to exist only because it is one of very few viable alternatives for the pros, a fact that I hope will change soon.
David ... I pretty much agree with the above. I did not come away
with a good feeling from my emailings back and forth with Frank Alverez
after my offer to help them. I have worked in corporations and have dealt
with several executive types who presented themselves in the same fashion
as Frank did. I can tell the sincere from the insincere (beaucratic bs).
Bottom line ... They have had time to do something noteworthy for the sport
and THE PLAYERS. There accomplishments, if any, are taking too long and
they are a dollar short, so to speak. People that are effective GET THE JOB
done, no matter what problems they encounter. Bill Lear had a vision of
building a business jet, hell and high water, he got it done, and better than
he hoped for. He moved from Switzerland to Wichita, Ks. built a plant, and
got the plane done on time. There are many colorful stories about him in
regards to his personality and habits.
The UPA may be fighting 'the good fight' for all I know, but I, and the average
poolplayer out there with any knowledge of Pool organizations, are not seeing
the results we all want for our sport. We can only be told wait a few more
years so many times. There lack of providing any 'real' advancement for the
sport indicates to us that perhaps they are 1. Unqualified to hold the position
they do 2. They are concerned with items they should not be 3. They
are bogged down with beaucracy, and thus rendering them ineffective for
all practical purposes. All of the UPA problems are not 5-10 year problems,
and they should be resolving them much more expeditely than they have
shown so far.
And when Frank Alverez gets chosen to represent our country in the
world 8 ball championships, it just serves to reinforce one's opinion of
the UPA in a negative light, and that the organization is not run in an
objective light.
Bottom line ... When it's time for the plane to fly, it either flys or it doesn't,
and people don't want to be told they are still waiting on parts.
Success is measured by results.