Figures. Cheap fix if you ask me. Other jurisdictions define (as well as Dr. Dave to an academic degree) frozen cue balls as single entities. Hence the no push logic. A shot like Ponger's with a subsequent legal hit <by the cue ball> should be the only allowed solution.Because the rules say it isn't? From WPA 6.7:
"However, if the cue ball is touching an object ball at the start of the shot, it is legal to shoot towards or partly into that ball (provided it is a legal target within the rules of the game) and if the object ball is moved by such a shot, it is considered to have been contacted by the cue ball."
Thanks for digging that rule up by the way.