For someone who is running out 18% of the time in their 8 ball matches, I would expect a much higher Fargo. Do you only run out in APA matches and not in anything that reports to Fargo?that’s pretty shitty I have 12 in 67 matches and I’m a 478. In 9 I have 8 in 57 matches. But with the qualifiers, regionals and Vegas your B&R’s dont go on the stats. Only the matches do. All you get are the “special” patches. I have at least 50 in 8 if you include those. And 20 in 9. I have a pile of those high level br patches. Those players you referenced are probably higher in b+rs also. First day playing minis in Vegas pic brlow…..I got 4 more patches the second mini I played also.
Another thing you need to consider is how they break. In 8 ball if players break wide open it’s usually easier to b+r than leaving all the balls in a 2ft box.. plus league stats are usually lower just do to the competitive level of play. The one 650 I know has 600 8 ball games in with only 400 B+Rs. That makes him not even 20% in league(he’s almost 90% win percentage, so breaks a lot). And a 630 has 20 in 8 in 100 matches
I gotcha. I do remember seeing people ask about the platform rather than the data. Have there been no responses? Not even a "none of your business?"No offence but the proof is literally riddled across this forum. Questions regarding anything fargo functionality are seemingly ignored, but within the very same threads Mike will chime in the moment a comment is made against the validity of his math.
I understand that not landing on your radar if you're not paying attention to those topics. However there is a very clear and consistent trend.
I will add I'm huge fan of fargo....
I'm totally willing to accept that I've missed some "not math validation" answers provided by Fargo(Mike). However because I am such a Fargo fanboy I tend to pay pretty close attention in hopes he will drop such nuggets of intel. During my years of doing so here on AZB all I've ever witnessed is radio silence.I gotcha. I do remember seeing people ask about the platform rather than the data. Have there been no responses? Not even a "none of your business?"
I'll start paying more attention. I also love fargo.
Truth is. I have better offense than defense and Fargorate is also a work in progress. My tournament play has been less than ideal. I like to drink. League only last 3-4 hours and is on Sunday afternoon. Tournaments run 6-7 hours at night. That’s not only a better time but a lot more time to drink and why my league stats are better. I have cooled it down as of late. 30 or 40 of those fargorate games I can’t recall. Went on a 0-10 run one night when I was falling over tables. Plus, for whatever reason, I keep getting slammed against the 600+’s in tournaments. Those are the same guys I play for cash and am only like 15-50 against them in tournaments.For someone who is running out 18% of the time in their 8 ball matches, I would expect a much higher Fargo. Do you only run out in APA matches and not in anything that reports to Fargo?
Recent Events
Texas Open 9-Ball
8/27/2021 12:00:00 AM
SWE: SM 9-BALL DAMER
8/22/2021 12:00:00 AM
Wild Rose 12
8/21/2021 12:00:00 AM
Fargo Ratings have the following approximate correspondence:
800 A top world-class player. Fewer than 20 players worldwide have ratings that exceed 800.
My tournament play has been less than ideal. I like to drink.Truth is. I have better offense than defense and Fargorate is also a work in progress. My tournament play has been less than ideal. I like to drink. League only last 3-4 hours and is on Sunday afternoon. Tournaments run 6-7 hours at night. That’s not only a better time but a lot more time to drink and why my league stats are better. I have cooled it down as of late. 30 or 40 of those fargorate games I can’t recall. Went on a 0-10 run one night when I was falling over tables. Plus, for whatever reason, I keep getting slammed against the 600+’s in tournaments. Those are the same guys I play for cash and am only like 15-50 against them in tournaments.
For reference and in all fairness. Looking at the players with 2000+ robustness I play for cash instead of in tournaments my fargorate would be in the 580-620 range. A 561 did give me a go last week but we ended up splitting sets. So maybe 560 on the low end. A 500-525 usually has no chance against me without a spot. Two days ago I split sets with a 620 and I came out on top last time we played. The one 600 asks for a game sometimes. Plus my APA rating would suggest I’m at least a 550.
I don’t know why I just explained all that. I tried before and got harassed about it. That’s why im sticking with the 478 now. if that’s what people want to believe go ahead. I’m not here to bullshit people and talk myself up. I just need to start putting up wins against 600+s and the Fargorate should follow.
Hey man. I know that. It’s just other people on this forum don’t get that when I try to explain it to them. They think I’m trying to talk myself up. I’m the guy that drinks for free a lot of times when playing for the cash.My tournament play has been less than ideal. I like to drink.
This isn't a FargoRate problem. If you give it drunk garbage games into the system, then it will give a garbage rating out.
Regarding the bolded point above, who was harassing you? I remember trying to explain that your rating isn't based on how you play, but how often you win. Not saying this is your case, but if someone is a great player, but gets drunk and wins at a 450 rate, then that player is a 450 fargo. Fargo doesn't care about how good we all think we are.Truth is. I have better offense than defense and Fargorate is also a work in progress. My tournament play has been less than ideal. I like to drink. League only last 3-4 hours and is on Sunday afternoon. Tournaments run 6-7 hours at night. That’s not only a better time but a lot more time to drink and why my league stats are better. I have cooled it down as of late. 30 or 40 of those fargorate games I can’t recall. Went on a 0-10 run one night when I was falling over tables. Plus, for whatever reason, I keep getting slammed against the 600+’s in tournaments. Those are the same guys I play for cash and am only like 15-50 against them in tournaments.
For reference and in all fairness. Looking at the players with 2000+ robustness I play for cash instead of in tournaments my fargorate would be in the 580-620 range. A 561 did give me a go last week but we ended up splitting sets. So maybe 560 on the low end. A 500-525 usually has no chance against me without a spot. Two days ago I split sets with a 620 and I came out on top last time we played. The one 600 asks for a game sometimes. Plus my APA rating would suggest I’m at least a 550.
I don’t know why I just explained all that. I tried before and got harassed about it. That’s why im sticking with the 478 now. if that’s what people want to believe go ahead. I’m not here to bullshit people and talk myself up. I just need to start putting up wins against 600+s and the Fargorate should follow.
When did that happen? A fairly short time ago, there were only three!At the very least, it's time to update these:
And this description of the meaning of a particular rating:
52 players are currently rated 800 or higher.
Well that’s right. But in that respect on avg any player can play up or down 100 balls on any given day(supposedly). If the only games going into fargorate system are when that player is playing at their worst they can be around 100 points off and play 200 over their rating on any given day too.Regarding the bolded point above, who was harassing you? I remember trying to explain that your rating isn't based on how you play, but how often you win. Not saying this is your case, but if someone is a great player, but gets drunk and wins at a 450 rate, then that player is a 450 fargo. Fargo doesn't care about how good we all think we are.
Truth is. I have better offense than defense and Fargorate is also a work in progress. My tournament play has been less than ideal. I like to drink. League only last 3-4 hours and is on Sunday afternoon. Tournaments run 6-7 hours at night. That’s not only a better time but a lot more time to drink and why my league stats are better. I have cooled it down as of late. 30 or 40 of those fargorate games I can’t recall. Went on a 0-10 run one night when I was falling over tables. Plus, for whatever reason, I keep getting slammed against the 600+’s in tournaments. Those are the same guys I play for cash and am only like 15-50 against them in tournaments.
For reference and in all fairness. Looking at the players with 2000+ robustness I play for cash instead of in tournaments my fargorate would be in the 580-620 range. A 561 did give me a go last week but we ended up splitting sets. So maybe 560 on the low end. A 500-525 usually has no chance against me without a spot. Two days ago I split sets with a 620 and I came out on top last time we played. The one 600 asks for a game sometimes. Plus my APA rating would suggest I’m at least a 550.
I don’t know why I just explained all that. I tried before and got harassed about it. That’s why im sticking with the 478 now. if that’s what people want to believe go ahead. I’m not here to bullshit people and talk myself up. I just need to start putting up wins against 600+s and the Fargorate should follow.