Replacing 3/8x10 with 3/8x10

spliced

AzB Silver Member
Silver Member
I may buy a sneaky with a regular 3/8x10 pin, and I want to have it changed to the SW style 3/8x10 with the flat minor and more shaft contact. Is this an easy change that won't require any reboring or re tapping?

Thanks
Ian
 
Hi Ian
The only person who can correctly answer that without seeing it is the guy who made the cue. I would say most definate on chasing it with a drill and tap anyway just to clean out what's left after removing the pin.
 
If it's a well-built custom cue, there's a SLIM chance that it could be done, but the shaft threads will never be just right.
To do it right, there will be some boring, plugging, and tapping involved.
Especially if it's a cheap cue.
 
The pitch is the same. Depending on the id of the shaft, you may not have to do anything.
 
I use the same tap for both style pins. The only difference is the sw style has a flat shoulder and needs boring to install

I hope I understood your question right
 
Last edited:
fullsplicefiend said:
I may buy a sneaky with a regular 3/8x10 pin, and I want to have it changed to the SW style 3/8x10 with the flat minor and more shaft contact. Is this an easy change that won't require any reboring or re tapping?

Thanks
Ian
I dunno how it can have more shaft contact if it's already bored .312.
The minor on the other 3/8 10 is .308.
 
i think Joey is right,you need to drill with .308" bit.i actually use a .307" but it works fine.i think my tailstock may be .0005-.001" anyway.

i don't think you will get the benefit of the pin unless you drill with a smaller bit.i also tap with a smaller tap too,and the head of the tap need to be .308" or a hair under.i only use that one plug tap.

as far as for the butt.i think it will work if the hole is deep enough after you bore .382" for the alignment barrel.hoefully you still have enough threads left in there to take the new pin.i have the depth of the barrel marked on my boring bar,so i am not sure how deep off the top of my head,but i would guess 1.5".

if that makes any sense at all.
 
dave sutton said:
I use the same tap for both style pins. The only difference is the sw style has a flat shoulder and needs boring to install

I hope I understood your question right

I forgot they still use those kind of pins,
 
Without properly cutting the shaft threads to match the pin, changing it makes ZERO SENSE. Changing it to begin with makes little enough sense to begin with, IMO. (assuming nothing is wrong with the original)
 
Sheldon's nailed it. Once again the voice of reason prevails. The swap makes no sense. There is absolutely nothing to be gained. The cue will have the exact same hit as before the surgery but your wallet will be a little lighter. That's the only thing that will change. Far too much emphasis is placed on the correlation btwn. the pin & hit. The vibrations that we associate with the hit travel North to South. They couldn't care less about contact with the minor diameter of the pin. The purpose of any pin is to connect the shaft to the handle securely, nothing more.

The OP stated he was contemplating this conversion on a sneaky. If it's a true sneaky, wood/wood there is nothing to be gained by messing with the joint. If it ain't broke, don't fix it.
 
Sheldon said:
Without properly cutting the shaft threads to match the pin, changing it makes ZERO SENSE. Changing it to begin with makes little enough sense to begin with, IMO. (assuming nothing is wrong with the original)

So why, are the S.W. styled pins becoming more popular when most are using the same old tap and just a different hole size with them?
 
More wood contact between the threads. Thicker wood between the threads less chance of stripping out when tightening the shaft down.

What I cant understand if what I said is right why is it that barringerr cues sell this pin and every cue I have seen built by them that comes around my area all the shafts are stripped out now threads left in them and wobbleing. Is he not boring the right size hole or sealing the threads on the shafts correctly. I have only seen a dozen of them in the last year.

Bob Hunter switched to this modified thread and I havent had a problem with any of the 8 cues I have of his.

Craig
 
n10spool said:
More wood contact between the threads. Thicker wood between the threads less chance of stripping out when tightening the shaft down.

What I cant understand if what I said is right why is it that barringerr cues sell this pin and every cue I have seen built by them that comes around my area all the shafts are stripped out now threads left in them and wobbleing. Is he not boring the right size hole or sealing the threads on the shafts correctly. I have only seen a dozen of them in the last year.

Bob Hunter switched to this modified thread and I havent had a problem with any of the 8 cues I have of his.

Craig
wow!
....
 
Last edited:
n10spool said:
More wood contact between the threads. Thicker wood between the threads less chance of stripping out when tightening the shaft down.

What I cant understand if what I said is right why is it that barringerr cues sell this pin and every cue I have seen built by them that comes around my area all the shafts are stripped out now threads left in them and wobbleing. Is he not boring the right size hole or sealing the threads on the shafts correctly. I have only seen a dozen of them in the last year.

Bob Hunter switched to this modified thread and I havent had a problem with any of the 8 cues I have of his.

Craig

Hi Craig
I would ask Joe, Better to start at the source rather than speculate, The only thing most of us will agree on here, on a regular basis is.
We agree to disagree. Sometimes it's interesting.
 
Last edited:
Far too much emphasis is placed on the correlation btwn. the pin & hit. The vibrations that we associate with the hit travel North to South. They couldn't care less about contact with the minor diameter of the pin. The purpose of any pin is to connect the shaft to the handle securely, nothing more.



i think different pins produce different results.it may all be in my head,but i defintely think some pins are better than others.
 
masonh said:
i think different pins produce different results. it may all be in my head, but i definitely think some pins are better than others.

No Sir, Not in your head. Better for you equals, Personal choice.
 
I use the radial pin and am completely happy with it.
I think it's more quiet than the regular 3/8 10 and 5/16 varieties.
 
maybe im crazy but i did a few reg 3x8-10 pins and still do. then i changed to the sw style 10 pin and i think it plays better. i leave that a little longer and it feels more solid. maybe it in my head. i like the look better too.
 
dave sutton said:
maybe im crazy but i did a few reg 3x8-10 pins and still do. then i changed to the sw style 10 pin and i think it plays better. i leave that a little longer and it feels more solid. maybe it in my head. i like the look better too.

But you also do stainless joints also with a 5/16X14, Personal choice and versatility, no one is wrong.
 
Michael Webb said:
So why, are the S.W. styled pins becoming more popular when most are using the same old tap and just a different hole size with them?
Easier to install accurately. As to claims that they will actually change the way the cue plays, I don't think I could ever tell the difference between pins of similar weight.
 
Back
Top