Hey Buckshot -
When I was @ 8 yrs old or thereabouts. my uncle told me never argue race, religion or politics, as you would never convince anyone of something beyond what they already believed... he shoulda tossed in one foul vs RO as well.

What you grew up knowing is exactly that, it's what you know. By instinct, and it's really a natural survival instinct, people stick with what life experience has taught them. I will never fault anyone, per se, for what they believe. I would, however, if motivated ( and, trying to be a fair-minded person, I like to think I would spend that time at least the majority of the time someone's beliefs didn't match mine ) spend a fair amount of time trying to understand
why they believe something.
So, I do "get" why people who have never played or seen played, anything other than 1 foul, feel it is the only way to go. I do. I get it. That, in no way, means I agree with it or like it. Because I don't, on either front. But I would be an idiot, which I don't think I am ( but, hey... jury could yet be out on that ), to think RO is "coming back". I wish it was. But for all intents and purposes, it's dead as the proverbial door nail.
My belief is, a game I love and have committed untold thousands of hours in my life both promoting and, more importantly, to me anyway, trying to understand, in every one of its myriad subtleties, the beauty and mystery of that game, is suffering. And it's lost some of that mystery and beauty. And it's heartbreaking to me in a way. Am I gonna break down and cry, sweating a match these days because they're playing "Duck and Cover"? Nahh... but I promise you, I won't ever sweat a match or match-up these days without thinking to myself, "Jesus... are you guys
ever gonna
go for something?" But that's because of what I grew up with.
Now... all that said. Mr Helfert has, in all probability, forgotten more about pool than I will ever know. I'm sure he's not the only one here who fits into that category, but we're talking about Jay at this point, so, I'll stick with him. I First hit a ball in 1960. I was 5 years old. I started taking it seriously in the late summer, fall, of 1967. I was 12, and then 13. That's when my love affair with the game really began. And I fell hard. I was infatuated. I wanted to know everything I could about it. I learned ( some, but not nearly enough ) about 3 cushion, cowboy pool, 3 ball, pill pool, cribbage, snooker, golf, 8 ball, 14.1, 6 ball, one pocket, banks... And then there was 9 ball. And she, my friend, she... was the most beautiful girl at the dance. And not only was she the prettiest. She was the smartest. The wittiest. The most mysterious. And, to me, by
FAR, the most dangerous. To say I was enraptured by her would be understating it. I was, head over heels... in
love.
So, I learned everything about 9 ball I possibly could. I picked brains. I watched. I listened. But most of all? I played. I played here. I played when we went on vacation in the Carolinas and Georgia. I played when I was stationed at Ft Ord in California. I played all over the mid-south when I was stationed at Ft Polk Louisiana. And I spent a good year, scuffling around the entire South and Southeast with one of the greatest players I've ever seen. And I learned a lot. A whole lot. And one thing I learned was, there are variations, everywhere you go. But the main thrust of the rules of 9 ball back then was this: you went for your shots. If you didn't have a shot, then you did your best to play safe. It was always "Best Effort". If you got hooked, you rolled out to a shot you felt you might make, but difficult enough that your opponent wouldn't want it.
That, I feel, is the crux of the difference between 9 ball now and 9 ball then. Best Effort. And, yeah, I know 99% of those who know nothing other than 1 foul will say playing safeties instead of going for a more difficult shot *is* Best Effort. I simply disagree. And because I grew up learning and playing what, for me, is almost another game altogether, I feel somewhat violated, every time I see "Duck and Cover". Is that fair? I don't think that even comes into play. "Fair" doesn't matter. It is what it is. C'est la vie. Do I have to like it or agree with it? No. And I don't. And no swinging d**k is ever gonna convince me 1 foul is a better game than RO. That doesn't make me right and them wrong or, vice versa. It's just the way it is.
But I'll tell ya what. I still love that girl. And you know what else? She hasn't aged one friken' day. Not one. She's just as pretty, just as smart, just as witty, just as mysterious as she ever was. And she's still every
damned bit as dangerous. And I'm still in love. And I will be til the day they put me in the ground.
So, in closing, do I think you're wrong? At all? Nope. But I do feel sorry for you in a way. Because I feel you've lost out on something for which there really is no explanation. You really had to have been there. I suppose it's akin to the difference between telling someone about being at Woodstock and, actually, having been there. I know you love the game, that's apparent to anyone who is adept to any degree in picking up on nuance. I simply feel you're missing something of which you have no understanding. Something beautiful and powerful. And it's something you'll never know. And because I love that game so much and want to share it with anyone who might take from it the same joy I do... I feel badly for you. That's the wrap-up.
( Man, was this a rambling post. Grady would be exceedingly proud, I think )