Ronnie O'sullivan

What would the rocket's fargo rate be after winning the masters for the seventh time?

I'll get right on that.....as soon as I finish working out the ultimate value of Pi.


...glad to see the Rocket win
 

Attachments

  • over9000.jpg
    over9000.jpg
    60.8 KB · Views: 899
Ya that's a good point...if he were a 9 ball player. He's a snooker player and it's incontestably a harder cue sport. If he spent his talent on a pool table instead of snooker he would've been head and shoulders above all.


Sent from my iPhone using AzBilliards Forums

I totally agree. I don't think the top pool pros are reaching anywhere near the level of play the top snooker guys are. Impossible to compare it but if we could somehow I bet that's what we'd find. In fact, if the snooker crowd could somehow all morph their talents over into pool, it may have made efren look like a soft match. I'm totally serious too.
 
Ya that's a good point...if he were a 9 ball player. He's a snooker player and it's incontestably a harder cue sport. If he spent his talent on a pool table instead of snooker he would've been head and shoulders above all.


Sent from my iPhone using AzBilliards Forums

I totally agree. I don't think the top pool pros are reaching anywhere near the level of play the top snooker guys are. Impossible to compare it but if we could somehow I bet that's what we'd find. In fact, if the snooker crowd could somehow all morph their talents over into pool, it may have made efren look like a soft match. I'm totally serious too.

If he spent time on 9 ball he might become competitive. Snooker players only only use 1/3 of the table anyway...so essentially they are playing on a 4x8...the big boys play on a 4 1/2 x 9 or a 5 x 10.
 
Last edited:
If he spent time on 9 ball he might become competitive.



Lmao this guys understatement of the year. In the past he's played 9 ball at a competitive level by just spending a minute amount of time learning it...how do you think 9 ball players will fare if they tried their stroke on a snooker table. Just like these guys said about the pay cut, if pool players could play snooker I think they would have already...


Sent from my iPhone using AzBilliards Forums
 
Lmao this guys understatement of the year. In the past he's played 9 ball at a competitive level by just spending a minute amount of time learning it...how do you think 9 ball players will fare if they tried their stroke on a snooker table. Just like these guys said about the pay cut, if pool players could play snooker I think they would have already...


Sent from my iPhone using AzBilliards Forums

Efren Reyes learned to play snooker in a few days.

he won a gold medal (snooker) in a SEA game's event in the 80s, after learning how to play the game few days before.. and http://www.9ballpool.co.uk/interviews/daryl_peach_240604.html you shld read this.. according to darryl peach, efren won jimmy white and ronnie o'sullivan with his pool cue.. :eek: tt's something..
 
Id be interested to see what the fargorate would look like in snooker. My guess would be there would be more distance between the players since lower tier pros very rarely beat top tier players. Even amongst the top players, the commentators were saying how Marco Fu hasn't beaten Ronnie in 8 years!

If I remember correctly from what was posted, in 9 ball an A player would expect to lose something like 10-3 or 10-4 to a pro (no idea what the actual number is) based on Fargo rate. The same level of player up against a top pro in snooker would be lucky to lose 10-0. So I'd be wonder how fargorate would handle that, since most amateurs would be lucky to pick up a single frame against pros. Would the number range be higher with a larger gap between groups of players?
 
Id be interested to see what the fargorate would look like in snooker. My guess would be there would be more distance between the players since lower tier pros very rarely beat top tier players. Even amongst the top players, the commentators were saying how Marco Fu hasn't beaten Ronnie in 8 years!

If I remember correctly from what was posted, in 9 ball an A player would expect to lose something like 10-3 or 10-4 to a pro (no idea what the actual number is) based on Fargo rate. The same level of player up against a top pro in snooker would be lucky to lose 10-0. So I'd be wonder how fargorate would handle that, since most amateurs would be lucky to pick up a single frame against pros. Would the number range be higher with a larger gap between groups of players?

Fargo for snooker should be calculated by points won not frames.
 
Fargo for snooker should be calculated by points won not frames.

I've seen handicaps that kind of work that way. But the problem is points scored is dependent on the level of player you are up against. A top amateur may regularly get 80 odd points per frame against me for example, and I would be able to manage an 80 odd aggregate against lower level players consistently. But perhaps an algorithm can be programmed to allow for that and weight scores based on competition.

I think fargorate would work well for snooker since you do have a very well defined pecking order within the game.
 
Last edited:
Efren Reyes learned to play snooker in a few days.

Efren would not play in the liability snooker game at Hard Times in Bellflower until he spent several days practicing and still would not play in the $50 a point game we had regularly in the early 90's. To say he learned in a few days is a stretch.

And Ronnie played for Europe in the Mosconi Cup At least twice. If he wanted to play more nine ball he would be a great player.

Players like Efren and Ronnie come along once in a lifetime. They would excel at any pool game they were dedicated to.
 
Back
Top