MR FB comment section.... someone mentioned a video comparing shaft rebound differences using this method.
				
			I remember that video, Bob had a test rig with a funny name, the mythbuster, or something like that.That whole FB post was stupid. The OP on FB didn't link the video. Everyone was guessing wtf he was talking about. OP on FB claimed he saw a video by Meucci of bouncing the shaft to determine cueball deflection (squirt). Now, we are doing the same here (guessing).
Here's a video about it posted by Bob Jewett in the past - don't know if it's the one you're talking about...I remember that video, Bob had a test rig with a funny name, the mythbuster, or something like that.
lots of builders back then used dense, old-growth maple for shafts. they were also heavy, used ivory ferrules and deflected a ton. i love my Jensen's dense/heavy ivy. ferruled shafts but i prefer using something with less defl.In the sixties, they always talked about Balabuskas having the best shaft grains.
Gave a better feel, but thx for peekin at videos.
I meant Bob Meucci, but that's a good Bob, too!Here's a video about it posted by Bob Jewett in the past - don't know if it's the one you're talking about...
pj
chgo
doesn't matter. the 'springier' the shaft the more the cue/shaft is going to rebound. Has nothing to do with how good the wood is. bottom line is this test has nothing to do with how a cue is going to play. never seen one good cuemaker bounce a cue like this for any reason.Thx, but this video was shaft & butt.
Cool!!! Vintage snake oil.....the more things change the more they stay the samedoesn't matter. the 'springier' the shaft the more the cue/shaft is going to rebound. Has nothing to do with how good the wood is. bottom line is this test has nothing to do with how a cue is going to play. never seen one good cuemaker bounce a cue like this for any reason.
