Shane losing his #1 Fargo spot

Thanks for the clarification. I've commented before that the WPA rankings have become a total joke, [...]
I'm not defending the WPA rankings. But WPA is the governing body for our sport and inclusion as a WPA ranking event is what gives calendar protection to an event.
[...]

Calling these race-to-four ten ball events, which aren't yet drawing the kind of fields that they hope to attract down the road, majors is similarly in error. [...]
We can argue about where the "major" line should be placed and get nowhere. Earlier you said something about "internationally diverse, elite field, that had at least half a dozen of the world's top 20 players." Event 1 of the 2022 Pro Billiard Series (Arizona Open last month) had 8 of the top 20 on the FargoRate world list. Shane would have been the 9th if he showed up. Mosconi players Styer and Reinhold played but don't even make the chart below because they are further to the right.

The Arizona event was full and paid $25K to the winner. Event 2 this week with a similar field is also full and will also pay $25K to win. I include this comparison to Turning Stone field not because anybody has claimed it is a major event but rather just for context because it is familiar.


1644152452493.png
 
[...]

Calling these race-to-four ten ball events, which aren't yet drawing the kind of fields that they hope to attract down the road, majors is similarly in error. [...]

I invite you to grab a cup of coffee and watch this 8-minute video on match formats.

 
I'm not defending the WPA rankings. But WPA is the governing body for our sport and inclusion as a WPA ranking event is what gives calendar protection to an event.

We can argue about where the "major" line should be placed and get nowhere. Earlier you said something about "internationally diverse, elite field, that had at least half a dozen of the world's top 20 players." Event 1 of the 2022 Pro Billiard Series (Arizona Open last month) had 8 of the top 20 on the FargoRate world list. Shane would have been the 9th if he showed up. Mosconi players Styer and Reinhold played but don't even make the chart below because they are further to the right.

The Arizona event was full and paid $25K to the winner. Event 2 this week with a similar field is also full and will also pay $25K to win. I include this comparison to Turning Stone field not because anybody has claimed it is a major event but rather just for context because it is familiar.


View attachment 627972
Agreed about Arizona. My bad. As it was just a few days before Derby City, many of the elite came to the US a few days early so they could play in both.

Very surprised, but very pleased to learn, that most the elite players who attended the Arizona Open, many of whom just went to their first Derby, have remained in the United States for the next event in that series.

The top Europeans (those presently in the Top 20 based on Fargo are Filler, Gorst, Shaw, Kaci, Ouschan, Feijen, Kazakis, Szewczyk, Zielinski, and He) make up 10 of the Top 20. If they start showing up to this event series, it will become very elite, and I'm sure it would please both of us if it happens. I'm guessing we'll only get about three of them, but on this occasion, I'd be delighted to be wrong.

Anytime one of these ten ball events "piggybanks" an event that carries Matchroom ranking points, there's reason for optimism as far as producing an elite, internationally diverse field. Guess we'll see how it develops.
 
I'm not trying to be argumentative (honest), but it seems to me that, if playing pool is your job/career, then income (money) is the ultimate goal. Winning more matches brings in more money. Winning more matches is also likely to bring in more sponsors, and thus more money. That is the name of the game....bringing home the bacon. A high Fargo rating, is simply a reflection of performing well in those matches.

If you don't finish in the top whatever, you not only lose tournament money, but you may also lose sponsorship money, too. And that might ultimately mean you lose your ability to pay the rent. And I suspect that would sting a lot more than a lower Fargo rating.

Of course, I could be wrong.
Overal I don't think you're wrong at all. However, once more, if your sponsor that's providing you guarenteed money wants you to use a specific piece of their equipment then that's what you're going to do. At least if you think the money they're offering is of more value than potential winnings.

If your sponsor is more concerned about product placement than fargo rate, then a ever so slightly heavier losing percentage is not in the equation.
 
[...]

The top Europeans (those presently in the Top 20 based on Fargo are Filler, Gorst, Shaw, Kaci, Ouschan, Feijen, Kazakis, Szewczyk, Zielinski, and He) make up 10 of the Top 20.

It's not surprising that you might inadvertently leave someone off the list. But the player you left off --Francisco Sanchez Ruiz--somehow is always the one. Ruiz has outperformed Van Boening, Filler, and Shaw for the last two years. And look at these results from more than 4 years ago when I searched posts by me that contain "Ruiz." This is sufficiently long ago that I was claiming Filler gets inadequate attention...

Everybody on your list except for Shaw and Feijen is signed up for Pro Billiard Series events 2 or 3

1644161060475.png
 
It's not surprising that you might inadvertently leave someone off the list. But the player you left off --Francisco Sanchez Ruiz--somehow is always the one. Ruiz has outperformed Van Boening, Filler, and Shaw for the last two years. And look at these results from more than 4 years ago when I searched posts by me that contain "Ruiz." This is sufficiently long ago that I was claiming Filler gets inadequate attention...

Everybody on your list except for Shaw and Feijen is signed up for Pro Billiard Series events 2 or 3

View attachment 627989
Yup, a hard-to-believe oversight. Obviously, I knew the Ruiz is one of the game's most elite. and has been for quite a while. He is not below my radar --- it was just a mistake.

Thanks for sharing the entries with me. This is wonderful news and bodes well for the continuing development of the best new series in American pool in many years.

Maybe this is too much to ask for, but can they have one of these events in New York City?
 
Yup, a hard-to-believe oversight. Obviously, I knew the Ruiz is one of the game's most elite. and has been for quite a while. He is not below my radar --- it was just a mistake.

Thanks for sharing the entries with me. This is wonderful news and bodes well for the continuing development of the best new series in American pool in many years.

Maybe this is too much to ask for, but can they have one of these events in New York City?
Call it the 'Lockdown Classic'. ;) Just kiddin.
 
Call it the 'Lockdown Classic'. ;) Just kiddin.
I'd be fine with that event name if that's the cost of having the event here. Still, I'm not too optimistic, largely due to a chat I once had with Pat Fleming on the subject of how much more it costs to produce a pool event in NYC than in other cities.
 
I'd be fine with that event name if that's the cost of having the event here. Still, I'm not too optimistic, largely due to a chat I once had with Pat Fleming on the subject of how much more it costs to produce a pool event in NYC than in other cities.
I can only imagine what it would cost compared to other locales.
 
Think this Fargo thing is dumb, Pool has enough handicaps already.

So a guy who is World Class Bank Pool Champion, should not be compared to some one who is 24/1, or One Pocket king.

Who be like comparing baseball, and football players.

Two different games, two different set of skill required.
 
Think this Fargo thing is dumb, Pool has enough handicaps already.

So a guy who is World Class Bank Pool Champion, should not be compared to some one who is 24/1, or One Pocket king.

Who be like comparing baseball, and football players.

Two different games, two different set of skill required.

one pocket and banks are not included, to my knowledge. i think barbox is included though.
 
one pocket and banks are not included, to my knowledge. i think barbox is included though.


I remember when Pool was not handicapped, getting your butt kicked was not excuse.

One an excuse to work on being better.

Best player in most sport work it like full time job, 40 hours or more per week.
 
It's not surprising that you might inadvertently leave someone off the list. But the player you left off --Francisco Sanchez Ruiz--somehow is always the one. Ruiz has outperformed Van Boening, Filler, and Shaw for the last two years. And look at these results from more than 4 years ago when I searched posts by me that contain "Ruiz." This is sufficiently long ago that I was claiming Filler gets inadequate attention...

Everybody on your list except for Shaw and Feijen is signed up for Pro Billiard Series events 2 or 3

View attachment 627989
I've been saying that Yapp and Ruiz have been very impressive of late.

Jaden
 
He'd rather catch a 40" lake trout. Doubt he really cares about this.
I don't buy it, they say they don't care but all of them have
egos as big as an elephant. Who does not want to be NUMBER ONE
even if there is no money attached.
 
I don't buy it, they say they don't care but all of them have
egos as big as an elephant. Who does not want to be NUMBER ONE
even if there is no money attached.
Shane chases titles and cash. He lets the points fall where they may. He's far more concerned with catching a huge laker than worrying about Fargo points.
 
Actually, Mike, it would be far more accurate to say that he has played in virtually every event having an internationally diverse, elite field, that had at least half a dozen of the world's top 20 players. That probably means the World Pool Championships, the US Open, the China Open, the All-Japan, the World Pool Masters, the Derby City 9-ball, the Derby City 10-ball and the International 9-ball.

After his great year in 2016, in which he won Derby City 9-ball and the US Open 9-ball, here is how it's gone for Shane in these events (yes, many of these events were cancelled in the last two years). He has played in twenty of them:

2017 US Open 9-ball – 13th
2017 Derby City 9-ball, 2nd
2018 International 9-ball, 4th
2018 World 9-ball championships – 3rd
2018 World Pool Masters – 2nd
2018 Derby City 9-ball- 3rd
2018 International Open – 4th
2019 World 9-ball championships –33rd
2019 World Pool Masters – 5th
2019 International 9-ball – 13th
2019 US Open 9-ball – 9th
2020 Derby City 9-ball – 5th
2020 Derby City 10-ball – 9th
2021 World Ten Ball championship - 5th
2021 US Open 9-ball – 9th
2021 World Pool Championships – 9th
2021 World Pool Masters 2021 – 2nd
2021 International 9-ball – 3rd
2022 Derby City 9-ball - 6th
2022 Derby City 10-ball – 5th

Lack of participation is a myth. Shane just isn't winning the big titles anymore. His results still confirm that he's still a top player, but in recent years he just hasn't gotten it done in the biggest spots and is not winning the kind of titles that he won earlier in his career.

By comparison, in the same period, Filler won the China Open, the US Open, the World 9-ball, and the Derby City 10-ball. For good measure, you can add two silvers at the Derby City 9-ball, a Mosconi Cup MVP, and a win at the American 14.1, the only straight pool event in America having a diverse, internationally elite field.

Hence, Shane's results over the past five years are way, way, way, way below the work put in by Filler. Head-to-head, it's also no contest. When Shane beat Filler at the 2021 World Pool Masters, the commentator indicated that this brought Shane's record to 2-9 against Filler over their past eleven meetings (no idea whether they were right, but it sounds about right to this fan).

In short, if Fargo rates them roughly even, I don't get it.

Yours, Stu (the biggest ever fan of Fargo ratings)
Thanks for the list Stu. You're absolutely right about SVB. We are used to him winning tournaments where he goes deep in the field, but over the past few years this has not been the case. He just hasn't been closing the way he and we are accustomed to .
 
  • Like
Reactions: sjm
Back
Top