There might be another somewhere...
John
return points
John
return points
So basically Scott spends tons of time, headaches and money and you think he should hand over the magic recipe?
Who is the Davis your referring too?
No disrespect meant to the wonderful cue makers, but where are the sharp bottom points?
I posted the Whisler cues as an example because they are the only ones I know that are razor sharp at the bottom. I have seen a lot of responses about other cues/makers with sharp bottom points but the pics I have seen don't actually have them. They are blunt.
The point s above labeled "return points" are a wonderful example of an up close picture of such a thing. They are not sharp, they are blunt. If I showed you full splice top points like that you would call it a failure and the cue maker would look bad.
So....bottom just as sharp as top. Who besides Whisler does it?
Whistler full-splice...are the veneers thicker than usual? If so, could that be clue?
I am a little confused, I just read over your postings and you have asked everything from dying glues to spindle speeds and have politely received a lot of valuable information. Now the first time you don't get what you want you become all offended. Do you have some illusion people on here owe you something? What information that is shared here is done as a courtesy not an obligation and I for one really appreciate it, I have learned a lot. Yes, some things may even be considered trade secrets, you need to respect that. Insulting the same people who have willingly helped you won't gain you anything. You do realize all capital letter represents yelling? I am at a bit of a loss with you attitude. You can only hope you don't get ignored now in the future.My bad! Thought this was ASK THE CUEMAKER for a minute there.
No disrespect meant to the wonderful cue makers, but where are the sharp bottom points?
Hi Here is some of Dmitrys sharp points . Full splice , with recut . Jim
![]()
![]()
There aren't going to be many full splice builders who offer sharp point returns. I will just touch on a few of the reasons here.
The most significant reason is return on investment. If a builder is going to offer them, they will need additional dedicated machinery where the jigs and fixtures that allow for the construction will occupy the equipment making it useless for other tasks. Without the dedicated machinery they will spend countless hours setting up testing, cutting, and retesting the fit to get the quality result that customers demand. Only to tear it back down until it is needed again and the process starts again. Time and material waste for this process or the amortized cost of the additional square footage and machinery would need to be passed on to the customer making the cue much more expensive.
Secondly, customers want longer points these days. The longer the point the smaller the angle at the return. This requires more labor and makes the job of hand knifing in the return significantly more difficult. And those same customers want veneers. A single re-cut doubles the labor for creating the splice and doubles the material waste. Traditional veneers require more dedicated machinery or setup time. Either way the price is going up again.
So if you, and a couple hundred other qualified buyers open up your wallets and dig a lot deeper you will see the sharp returns on full splice cues that you are asking for. Until then, saw blade kerf width returns really aren't that bad.
....................................my bad! Thought this was ask the cuemaker for a minute there.
I understood all of that very well, but thank you anyway. The point was not why don't more do it, but who does actually do it.
I am also curious about how it is done. There is likely more than one way to skin that cat. It is a curiosity, an interest, nothing more. Not looking for anybody's secrets. I am betting that some do it "better" than others as well. So I am interested in comparing and contrasting.
Personally, I think it's an example of excellence in cue making. More difficult, more time consuming, more expensive? Yes. But there are many cues featured in these forums that go WAY beyond this mere feature as far as complexity and expense.
I am a little confused, I just read over your postings and you have asked everything from dying glues to spindle speeds and have politely received a lot of valuable information. Now the first time you don't get what you want you become all offended. Do you have some illusion people on here owe you something? What information that is shared here is done as a courtesy not an obligation and I for one really appreciate it, I have learned a lot. Yes, some things may even be considered trade secrets, you need to respect that. Insulting the same people who have willingly helped you won't gain you anything. You do realize all capital letter represents yelling? I am at a bit of a loss with you attitude. You can only hope you don't get ignored now in the future.
How do you know that if you don't know how it is done. You seem to be saying in one sentence that this technique is simple and you want to understand how it is done but don't want to know any deep dark secrets. If it was so simple don't you think there would be more than 3 or 4 people, out of the thousands of builders, who know how to do it? The reason that more don't do them is because the technique is a deep dark secret. If you believe it is so simple why don't you explain to us how it is accomplished. I would also like to know and I've been building cues for 20 years.
Dick