Jimmy M. said:
This ranks up there with some of the more ridiculous posts you've made; and that's saying something.
Which better players look down on the lesser players? Any person who looks up, or down, to someone based solely on their skill level on a pool table has issues that go beyond their opinion on whether or not pool needs "the bangers". This conversation of yours sounds imaginary. The better players are "in a constant state of poking fun at the bangers"? Seriously. Just lay off the chronic, man. It ain't doing you any favors.
Believe it or not, "the better players", as you keep referring to them as, have little interest in watching the social players play, and even less interest in sitting there, watching them play, and bothering to poke fun at them! If there are any players out there that do that, I would just chalk that up to an individual case of someone with ridiculously low self-esteem grasping at something to make themselves feel better (either that or just an individual case of someone being an idiot).
It's totally obvious that you harbor some sort of negative feelings toward "the better players", and any opinions they may have. That's why you keep starting these pointed threads that pit "the better players" against "the lesser players".
Whether or not someone looks down on "the lesser players" has nothing to do with how that person plays themselves. Trust me, there are some people, right here in Phoenix no less, that seem to value people based on their pool games while, ironically, they don't play very good themselves.
So, just to answer the original question of, "does pool need the bangers?"; Is there anyone out there who really thinks that there would be a pool industry if not for the recreational players? The top players probably represent less than 1% of the pool playing population. If anyone is so delusional that they think an industry can survive on less than 1% of its participants, does anyone even care what they think?