Slippery cloth

Jason Robichaud

AzB Silver Member
Silver Member
Anyone play on slippery cloth? What I am talking about is the CB doesn't grab when playing spin. With draw, the CB slides forward through the contact zone before coming back. I couldn't get use to playing shape on these strange playing, crazy fast tables.
 
Yes I've played on them before. They are hard to do anything with the QB on them. Add fast rails to them and you really have a nightmare. Johnnyt
 
I thought that was just dead felt?

Been playing on them for 2 years now.

Yes it sucks. Add the mudd ball, 60 year old table/slate. Dead rails and unlevel tables and you have something to genuinely celebrate if you runout.
 
I thought that was just dead felt?

Been playing on them for 2 years now.

Yes it sucks. Add the mudd ball, 60 year old table/slate. Dead rails and unlevel tables and you have something to genuinely celebrate if you runout.

This sounds like what I played on last Wednesday, absolutely miserable. I rolled in a stop shot and had to use a power draw stroke that looked like I was trying to draw it two rails just to get it to come back a little.
 
I dunno how bad it was for you but I got used to 720 and liked it. I hear carom cloth though is like playing on ice. Quick draw is one of those subtle useful things, I dunno if I could live without it.

I'll take icy cloth over dirty old nappy slow cloth though.
 

CueTable Help



Here is what I'm talking about. Spin on the table would really take, a stop shot was good for about 2 ft of draw. Problem was, 4ft of draw was good for about 3 ft cause the CB would go past the strike zone like on the 5 ball. Taking a ball into the side rail and out to middle was another problem as you can see with CB A.

To give you an idea, diamonds play about 2 diamonds slower on the lag than the table I'm talking about.
 

CueTable Help



Here is what I'm talking about. Spin on the table would really take, a stop shot was good for about 2 ft of draw. Problem was, 4ft of draw was good for about 3 ft cause the CB would go past the strike zone like on the 5 ball. Taking a ball into the side rail and out to middle was another problem as you can see with CB A.

To give you an idea, diamonds play about 2 diamonds slower on the lag than the table I'm talking about.
Well I guess that's why 3 Cushion is a nightmare. The best tables are very fast and the cloth does slide.

Looking at the CueTable I'd have to guess that the CB was heavier than the OB's if there was that much forward travel before your draw spin took.
 
Anyone play on slippery cloth? What I am talking about is the CB doesn't grab when playing spin. With draw, the CB slides forward through the contact zone before coming back. I couldn't get use to playing shape on these strange playing, crazy fast tables.

What kind of cloth?
 
yeah, I think you had a gaffy cue ball. That 5 you diagrammed looks impossible. A near straight shot with any sort of draw can't travel forward past the tangent line. The idea of travelling forward (nearly straight still) and then drawing back is like some sort of trick involving liquid filled balls, grease, and goat sacrifices.
 
yeah, I think you had a gaffy cue ball. That 5 you diagrammed looks impossible. A near straight shot with any sort of draw can't travel forward past the tangent line. The idea of travelling forward (nearly straight still) and then drawing back is like some sort of trick involving liquid filled balls, grease, and goat sacrifices.

Over-sized cue ball, Johnson's paste floor wax....and you'll have a cue ball that'll pass the object ball on a straight draw at least 6-8"...then stop for a split second...then reverse and take off. But a cue ball of the same size as the object ball, no...when equal force meets up with a stationary equal force with draw english....it's not passing the line of impact before reversing...not a chance.

Glen
 
Back
Top