Give her some slack
I'm surprised at the venom in this thread. I'm glad that she chose to write about pool. Writing about pool might encourage people to play and more people playing, well, that's a lot of people playing....you know the rest.
The point is, when someone writes a column, it's hard to continually come up with topics and eventually you're going to rub people the wrong way. I say give her a break and be glad for the publicity that pool got-good or bad.
I also think that we as Americans write nastygrams way too often. To the people that sent her a nasty email, have you ever sent an email to a writer that you didn't know to tell them how much you enjoyed reading their article? I try to balance the good and bad by writing two good letters (at least) for every nastygram that I write. I also try to phrase the nastygram so that it is tactful and takes issue with the opinion or error instead of the writer.
As someone who writes a column for a local newspaper, I can tell you that it's disheartening to get hate mail. I was recently called a 'fascist trying to create an elitist hovel' in print because I stated my opinion that young people should invest in real estate. I have never gotten an email or card from someone who enjoyed my column. Since I do it for the joy of it and don't get paid a dime, it can be even more discouraging to receive these types of letters.
One last point, after getting barraged with hate mail from pool players because they didn't see the humor in the way she depicted our sport, do you think she'll ever forray into writing something positive about our sport again?
Cheers,
RC
TX Poolnut said:What are your immediate thoughts?
There's more than 1 way to play pool
Joy James – Conn. Post Online
There's definitely an art to playing pool. I can truthfully say that I've not quite mastered it. Some would assume that pool is a game engineered to mathematically sink balls into the pockets using skill, geometry and some physics, yada, yada, yada. I'm convinced it's a game of chance, luck and, yes, I'll admit it, some skill. The skill I'm referring to depends on who is playing the game. I'm not talking about the people who see pool as a sport, join leagues and enter tournaments. I'm talking about people, like myself, that see pool purely as a recreational activity. If the players are a couple of guys, the game can get intense. It may involve some sort of wager to see which player has more know-how. If ladies are playing, they're probably playing for the enjoyment of it. They might want to see who can get the balls to go where they planned, based on how powerful they strike the cue ball. Another set of pool players might be devised of a mixed table, a gender split — women verses the men. There's no other way to say it. This type of game is pure war. When a man decides to play against a woman, he's playing for a couple of reasons. He might want to impress her with skills and win; help her to develop some skills of her own and not win; or, competing is just in his blood and he can't help himself — a sport is a sport. Period! When a woman allows a man to play against her, she's sending a couple of messages. She might feel that she has to let him win — to keep his ego intact; or, she beats the pants off of him, and realizes who really wears the trousers. The other approach is to act like you have no clue whatsoever about why you need to hit the same ball over and over again, so that the other pretty balls go in the hole things at the side of the table. Why not hit each ball directly? Well, hopefully no one is really that cue-less! Not to say that there aren't some excellent female pool players out there — I know ESPN has shown women's tournaments. When everything's said and done, a game is just that — a game. Unless you're a professional athlete and it's your job to make the rest of us — who are too lazy to get up and indulge in physical activity — just sit back and watch the sport.
Page designer Joy James writes monthly on Sundays. She can be reached at jjames@ctpost.com.
I'm surprised at the venom in this thread. I'm glad that she chose to write about pool. Writing about pool might encourage people to play and more people playing, well, that's a lot of people playing....you know the rest.
The point is, when someone writes a column, it's hard to continually come up with topics and eventually you're going to rub people the wrong way. I say give her a break and be glad for the publicity that pool got-good or bad.
I also think that we as Americans write nastygrams way too often. To the people that sent her a nasty email, have you ever sent an email to a writer that you didn't know to tell them how much you enjoyed reading their article? I try to balance the good and bad by writing two good letters (at least) for every nastygram that I write. I also try to phrase the nastygram so that it is tactful and takes issue with the opinion or error instead of the writer.
As someone who writes a column for a local newspaper, I can tell you that it's disheartening to get hate mail. I was recently called a 'fascist trying to create an elitist hovel' in print because I stated my opinion that young people should invest in real estate. I have never gotten an email or card from someone who enjoyed my column. Since I do it for the joy of it and don't get paid a dime, it can be even more discouraging to receive these types of letters.
One last point, after getting barraged with hate mail from pool players because they didn't see the humor in the way she depicted our sport, do you think she'll ever forray into writing something positive about our sport again?
Cheers,
RC