superminsoo
Registered
Are you sure?
Definitely not. Carom billiards require more basic knowledge than pocket billiards. I meant that both require cue ball control and accurate object hits and placements.
The guys an idiot.
Are you sure?
I had to post again, are you serious. REALLY, did you watch this?
I enjoy the part where he pauses to think and then taps 1/4 inch.
Tough tough game.
Poor guy. Fellas like this usually couldn't manage a run of 10 if their lives depended on it - that is, if they ever had the guts to give it a try. Odds are he could never bring himself to attempt the challenge, since he would then be forced to admit to himself how terrible his touch for the game actually is.
He isn't alone though - lots of folks believe that the game is super easy simply because they read about the extremely high run records in history books (usually done on old slow cloth in a stationary nurse without actual tournament balkline rules). Players like Caudron sure makes it appear easy. If one is ready to find out how poor their speed control is really is, they only need to give straight-rail a go.
Unfortunately, the poster happens to be right about ESPN airing this (at least particular player who is very methodical).
I think serious pool fans in the US might actually enjoy watching Caudron vs. Efren lock horns in a balkline match. Balkline is one of Efren's favorite games - a fact that I feel clearly ("magically") shines through when he plays pool - so I personally would love to witness a matchup like this happen someday...
-Ira
...51...boink...52....boink...53...."What's that honey? Dinner? Ok...I'll be right up...." Oh crap....where was I....damn....1...boink....2....boink...
ZZzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzz
Definitely not. Carom billiards require more basic knowledge than pocket billiards. I meant that both require cue ball control and accurate object hits and placements.
The guys an idiot.
pool is to carom what guitar playing is to violin: you can pick up a guitar and quickly produce a few chords that sound okay, while the violin guy will spend months pissing off the neighbors before producing anything vaguely audible. But if you want to play the Aranjuez concerto, you need as many years of experience, and every bit as much finesse as the violin player.:smile:
Very nicely said. It kind of went back to some genius thinking that running say, 100 in free game took "no skill", just pushing the ball a quarter inch over and over zzzzzzzzz. You'd think hearing people say that about 14.1 would teach you something but ignorance is everywhere
I see some things never change. The elitism in carom circles for one. And I thought it was only some of the old farts I play with here in Europe...
I play straight pool and straight rail carom. I started with straight rail and 3C 20 years ago when I lived in France, and I was like you guys (and most folks in my club): pocket billiards? Oh yeah, that's for bangers/teenagers/morons/those who can't play any better. Then 12 years ago I moved to the US and couldn't find a carom table anywhere in sight. So I started playing pool for lack of anything better. Pretty soon, I played 9-ball reasonably well. Then one day some guy came in the pool hall, proposed a game of 14.1 and whooped my ass. Me! A straight rail player who could almost averaged 14!
Tell you what friend: the day you perform a century run at straight pool, I dare you to come back here and honestly post that carom billiard requires more basic knowledge than pocket billiards. That statement alone tells me you never played anything other than 9-ball, if you ever played any pool at all.
You need to realize, pool is to carom what guitar playing is to violin: you can pick up a guitar and quickly produce a few chords that sound okay, while the violin guy will spend months pissing off the neighbors before producing anything vaguely audible. But if you want to play the Aranjuez concerto, you need as many years of experience, and every bit as much finesse as the violin player.
Carom isn't better, it's different. That's why I play both, and that's why you should too.
If we stopped drawing lines between the games, the bar would rise across the board. In my view, between all forms of billiards, skill is measured by how well the player can manipulate the motion of the balls. The cueist who has the ability to better command the direction, speed and action of the balls will win over the cueist with a lesser degree of control.
Driven by the rules and requirements of the individual's game, skill sets obviously have to get prioritized during practice and development. Naturally, players of a single discipline inadvertently neglect "lower-priority" practice areas as they perfect the skills that they have deemed to be at the top of their list. However, in complete isolation from other forms, the tendency is to minimally develop certain skills to a mere fraction of the degree that is possible - even by the standard of novices from another discipline.
In truth, there is a tremendous overlap of skills that can be leveraged between all billiard games.
Some novice carom players lose emphasis on the importance of accurate hits while in the process of sifting though the mountain of speed/spin/rail material (there is a lot to digest and understand) - that is until kiss avoidance and position/safety tactics restore the precision contact to a high-priority practice item. In the end, a 3-cushion carom player that cannot achieve precise hits will suffer against a more complete player.
On the pool side, there is a tendency for newcomers to pay less initial attention on the precise speed of the object balls or exacting amounts of cue ball action (i.e. spin influence from balls and sequential rails) as they hone their fundamentals around achieving the precision hits they need to pocket balls. Later, as the need for good safety play and tactics rises, object ball speed and precision rail work become priorities.
Efren Reyes' relatively strong background in balkline/one-cushion/3-cushion provides support for the theory that his carom/pool cross-breeding contributes to what makes him so dangerous against the playing field he competes against. I would say that Torbjorn Blomdahl's interdisciplinary skills in snooker/pool games (along with the fact that he's got the competitive heart of a monster) give him an edge over his many carom-only experts.
Otherwise stated: I'm sure that very few (if any) tournament pool players could hold a candle to Reyes' carom game. The same could probably be said about Blomdahl's pool game vs the usual tournament carom players.
A player who dwells too much on which game is harder by trivializing the difficulty of other games is probably going to miss out on the main point and has their work still ahead of them... it's all billiards and we're all cueists.
-Ira
I am sorry so much animosity came from my posting of a straight rail link on you tube.
If we stopped drawing lines between the games, the bar would rise across the board. In my view, between all forms of billiards, skill is measured by how well the player can manipulate the motion of the balls. The cueist who has the ability to better command the direction, speed and action of the balls will win over the cueist with a lesser degree of control.
Driven by the rules and requirements of the individual's game, skill sets obviously have to get prioritized during practice and development. Naturally, players of a single discipline inadvertently neglect "lower-priority" practice areas as they perfect the skills that they have deemed to be at the top of their list. However, in complete isolation from other forms, the tendency is to minimally develop certain skills to a mere fraction of the degree that is possible - even by the standard of novices from another discipline.
In truth, there is a tremendous overlap of skills that can be leveraged between all billiard games.
Some novice carom players lose emphasis on the importance of accurate hits while in the process of sifting though the mountain of speed/spin/rail material (there is a lot to digest and understand) - that is until kiss avoidance and position/safety tactics restore the precision contact to a high-priority practice item. In the end, a 3-cushion carom player that cannot achieve precise hits will suffer against a more complete player.
On the pool side, there is a tendency for newcomers to pay less initial attention on the precise speed of the object balls or exacting amounts of cue ball action (i.e. spin influence from balls and sequential rails) as they hone their fundamentals around achieving the precision hits they need to pocket balls. Later, as the need for good safety play and tactics rises, object ball speed and precision rail work become priorities.
Efren Reyes' relatively strong background in balkline/one-cushion/3-cushion provides support for the theory that his carom/pool cross-breeding contributes to what makes him so dangerous against the playing field he competes against. I would say that Torbjorn Blomdahl's interdisciplinary skills in snooker/pool games (along with the fact that he's got the competitive heart of a monster) give him an edge over his many carom-only experts.
Otherwise stated: I'm sure that very few (if any) tournament pool players could hold a candle to Reyes' carom game. The same could probably be said about Blomdahl's pool game vs the usual tournament carom players.
A player who dwells too much on which game is harder by trivializing the difficulty of other games is probably going to miss out on the main point and has their work still ahead of them... it's all billiards and we're all cueists.
-Ira
I am sorry so much animosity came from my posting of a straight rail link on you tube.
Go to youtube and type in Xavier Gretillat, watch his American series video. He puts the red and opponent white together facing the open table, and then gathers them onto the rail into a specific pattern. Repeatedly, without missing, from different positions.
When ANYONE here who thinks this game is easy is willing to bet they can gather them into the rail nurse like that, just post on AZ and we can bet some money.