Write out specifications or requirements for the demonstration and then make it an open competition.
Standard Table Conditions Discussion
- Thread starter justnum
- Start date
Write out specifications or requirements for the demonstration and then make it an open competition.
i just did
From my experience research proposals get approved funding from requests firsts.
And that funding is meant to employ tenured faculty all the way down to research for undergrads.
If I am talking to a researcher then you will not get my secrets. If you are a legislator then we would talk in general.
I cant tell if your a pirate or a policymaker.
Table cloths should be treated like Jerseys. The table cloth Mike, Earl and SVB won on is historic and usually overlooked. What do they do with the cloth at the end of an event anyway?
The problem with charging the balls as you are suggesting is it requires a very high voltage and high current electrical source that can kill instantly if touched to be applied to each ball before every break. Its just not safe enough to be feasible.
Frictionless in a true vaccum void of all light and radiation on a perfectly level surface, probably need to change laws of quantum mechanics as well too but I dont know those very well. Perfectly round balls too with center of gravity perfectly in the center. Oh yea also needs to take place in a spherical shell to stop gravity from the outside.
Also needs to be shot with cue EXACTLY held at pivot point on a cue with perfect uniform weight distribution and perfectly uniform material and aimed perfectly 0.0 degrees straight exactly. Might as well just say hit dead perfectly instead of the pivot point crap. Oh yea the tip needs to be perfectly flat and perfect hardness too.
I guess the simple way to say this is hit perfectly straight with perfectly crafted materials and no external forces and no quantum mechanics.
Last edited:
Is that physics poetry because it sounds like technical specs with no purpose?
Why did you leave out calculus concepts?
Throw in a Jacobian and Wronskian too.
Diagonalize a linear system.
Math theory is more powerful than physics vocabulary. Its already been generalized in mathematical physics.
Back to the topic of cloth and table specs. Instead of cloth that needs adhesive how about cloth that is magnetically sealed for easy changing.
So does that mean you don't have a product. You've said the Maxwell cloth is selling out fast? What are you selling then?
Did your business class suggest you can raise a few hundred million dollars by posting on AZB?
What's your price for a demonstration?
Write a request for proposal and put into bidding.
You don't have any experience if you think research proposals get funded simply by requests.
Gravity and friction and quantum mechanics can be added to electricity, magnetism, and Maxwell's equations as subjects you don't know much about. It is curious where you get these ideas from.
You're the one selling something.
You say you can provide a demonstration for a price. What do you think it's worth?
Just talking about it counts at the research level. Are you from the private side of things?
you sound like a little fish with a smaller budget.
Last edited:
Said the minnow in his mom's basement.
How long do you think you might have to wait for someone on AZB to give you a few hundred million dollars?
Can you think of any other examples of someone with no demonstrable business knowledge and no demonstrable physics knowledge getting paid any amount by anyone to research something in business or physics?
You still haven't described what you're selling in your pop up shop. You said the Maxwell Cloth was selling out quickly. Is it all sold out yet?
That is how I would describe a math research think tank.
I have a good understanding of classical physics both theoretically and mathematically.
Are you mistaking me for justin? I am not him. I was just answering his pointless question. I do not endorse any of this crap he is pushing here because its obviously all unfeasible; or impossible to implement; or if implemented would get people killed.
I do however, have no problem conversing with him about his imaginary pie in the sky stuff because to me its actually more fun to talk about than the same regurgitated topic here for the 100th time.
So his stuff asinine but at least its original.
And if you think my response to Justin's post shows I have no clue what I am talking about then it proves that you obviously have no clue what you are talking about.
So next time respond with a real rebuttal other than some blanket insult so I can give a real response showing how wrong you are.
Last edited:
So the guy who constantly says mathematical jargon but has never posted anything mathematical wants some math?
I was responding to your infinitely long pool shot crap you pulled out of thin air. Ok, here is some worthless math to go along with your worthless question.
Neglecting all external forces and all laws of quantum physics the general formula for an infinite pool shots location is for an infinite pool shot is:
x=0
y=u+t*v
Where u is the distance it took place to perform the acceleration. And where v is a positive non-zero constant and t>=0 and t is relative to when the acceleration of the ball stopped.
You can differentiate or integrate or rotate the coordinate system or diagonialize it or whatever on that all you want I really dont care. The whole question was stupid in the first place. How about you give some calculus or linear algebra or whatever YOURSELF next time instead of spouting off some dream you had that the stuff you are talking about is top secret on a public message board?
You seem to be the one that doesn't offer anything other than words in all your posts and constantly shows a non-existant understanding of what is practical, what is non-practical, what is feasible, what is non-feasible, and what is fact and what is fiction.
I just thought about this topic a little bit more.
As I said before I don't take this stuff very seriously so dont go off on me about this.
But here is my idea to make justins magnetic balls, which I do think might be possible, but just are not practical.
First there needs to be an energy source in the balls. This could either be a battery or a capacitor. There is no way around this really.
So the battery/capacitor is attached to electromagnetic coils inside the balls. There is a relay that is triggered by magnetism that connects the capactitor/battery to the electromagnetic coils.
The coils work in two ways: 1. to induct charge into the capactor for later use. 2. to act as an electromagnet
First before each rack the balls are placed into a charging bin and a magnetic field is applied. This causes the capacitor to charge.
Next the balls are placed on the table and in the rack. Now a stronger magnetic field than the one used for initial charging momentarily is applied to the balls. This causes the relay to be triggered which connects the capacitor to the coil so the balls are now magnetized. They can now be racked magnetically.
There is also some sort sensor/crystal inside which is attached to the relay and will cause it to untrigger upon sensing any significant impact shock.
The arrangement of the magnets so they perform their proper function is a whole other story and I'm not sure how to do this without interference issues.
The capacitor would be kept inside the coil of course so it is free from any magnetic interference. I'm not sure how it would be affected by the charging field/other balls, however, so this might make it not work.
Obviously getting the balls to be balanced is going to be next to impossible.
Also, because of the fact that an applied magnetic field is going to destroy any digital electronics the electrical mechanism's 'logic' is limited. Of course this right here makes the whole idea useless because people are going to constantly fry their digital electronics operating this thing even if the balls could be balanced.
I'm sure an EE would have a better design as I'm just a CS.
As I said before I don't take this stuff very seriously so dont go off on me about this.
But here is my idea to make justins magnetic balls, which I do think might be possible, but just are not practical.
First there needs to be an energy source in the balls. This could either be a battery or a capacitor. There is no way around this really.
So the battery/capacitor is attached to electromagnetic coils inside the balls. There is a relay that is triggered by magnetism that connects the capactitor/battery to the electromagnetic coils.
The coils work in two ways: 1. to induct charge into the capactor for later use. 2. to act as an electromagnet
First before each rack the balls are placed into a charging bin and a magnetic field is applied. This causes the capacitor to charge.
Next the balls are placed on the table and in the rack. Now a stronger magnetic field than the one used for initial charging momentarily is applied to the balls. This causes the relay to be triggered which connects the capacitor to the coil so the balls are now magnetized. They can now be racked magnetically.
There is also some sort sensor/crystal inside which is attached to the relay and will cause it to untrigger upon sensing any significant impact shock.
The arrangement of the magnets so they perform their proper function is a whole other story and I'm not sure how to do this without interference issues.
The capacitor would be kept inside the coil of course so it is free from any magnetic interference. I'm not sure how it would be affected by the charging field/other balls, however, so this might make it not work.
Obviously getting the balls to be balanced is going to be next to impossible.
Also, because of the fact that an applied magnetic field is going to destroy any digital electronics the electrical mechanism's 'logic' is limited. Of course this right here makes the whole idea useless because people are going to constantly fry their digital electronics operating this thing even if the balls could be balanced.
I'm sure an EE would have a better design as I'm just a CS.
Last edited: