Stan's New Video Part Deux

So your point is a person saying 2+2 = 5 is akin to a person saying CTE is 100% objective?

Well it's quite easy to prove that 2+2 does not equal 5.

How easily can you prove that CTE is NOT 100% objective?

Well, like you guys are fond of saying, it's been explained to you many times in the past but you are either unwilling, or unable, to comprehend it. Cults are like that.
 
Well, like you guys are fond of saying, it's been explained to you many times in the past but you are either unwilling, or unable, to comprehend it. Cults are like that.

I've stated in the past that I have no idea if my subconscious is involved or not. In recent times, I have never been dismissive of the fact that it could be. While it certainly felt like I was in complete control of every single movement when I used the system. I understand that one can not control the subconscious.

Unlike you, however, I honestly don't care either way. Details aside, the fact of the matter is the system works absolutely fine for those that put in the work.
 
Person A: 2+2 = 5

Person B: No, 2 + 2 does not equal 5. How can you even say that?

Neil: Who made you the sole aribiter (not arbitrator) of what makes sense and what doesn't?

ar·bi·tra·tor
ˈärbəˌtrādər/
noun
an independent person or body officially appointed to settle a dispute.
synonyms: adjudicator, arbiter, judge, referee, umpire; More


Your quote-"Stan keeps making videos that don't make a lot of sense when you dig beneath the surface just a little."

You made a claim as a statement of fact. You never said that his videos don't make a lot of sense to YOU. Rather, you made your statement all inclusive. I never claimed to be the one that made that claim, you did. Rather, I have stated in the past that CTE might not make any sense if one is just looking at it. It will make much more sense once one actually takes it to the table and learns it.
 
Well, like you guys are fond of saying, it's been explained to you many times in the past but you are either unwilling, or unable, to comprehend it. Cults are like that.

So you have joined the English cult, good luck with that.
 
Here's an observation.

Dan likes to throw the word "cult" around, but cults usually recruit members. I don't think I've ever seen any CTE users push it on anyone else.

In fact, when people have questions and are genuinely interested in learning the system. The users are always helpful and accommodating.
 
ar·bi·tra·tor
ˈärbəˌtrādər/
noun
an independent person or body officially appointed to settle a dispute.
synonyms: adjudicator, arbiter, judge, referee, umpire; More

:thumbup::thumbup::thumbup:
 
I've stated in the past that I have no idea if my subconscious is involved or not. In recent times, I have never been dismissive of the fact that it could be. While it certainly felt like I was in complete control of every single movement when I used the system. I understand that one can not control the subconscious.

Newsflash -- your subconscious is involved. I do appreciate that you are paying proper respect to you subconscious. I'm sure Stan will say you are either doing it wrong, or don't understand what is happening. I think you do.

Unlike you, however, I honestly don't care either way. Details aside, the fact of the matter is the system works absolutely fine for those that put in the work.

I'm glad it helps you play better, seriously. However, some people do care how it works, especially when certain claims are made to promote the product that are implausible. The other thing is, if more people took the attitude that it doesn't matter how anything works, we would probably still be living like Fred Flintstone. :smile:
 
ar·bi·tra·tor
ˈärbəˌtrādər/
noun
an independent person or body officially appointed to settle a dispute.
synonyms: adjudicator, arbiter, judge, referee, umpire; More

I'll concede that you could use either word given the loose definitions in online dictionaries. However, given the choice to use either "arbitrator" or "arbiter" in this context, arbiter is the better word. In our debate there is no legal contract stipulating arbitration as a recourse. You can't really have an arbitrator if there is no underlying arbitration agreement. You can make someone an arbiter but you can't make them an arbitrator (because there is no arbitration agreement in place).

https://www.translegal.com/common-mistakes/arbitrator-arbiter-arbitration-and-arbitrage
 
What happened to your declaration of "I give up"? :smile:

I'm not stopping anybody from buying DVD's and learning CTE. I'm also not trying to convert any cult members over to reality. That ship has sailed. That leaves only entertainment. When you guys get boring I'll leave. :)
 
I'm not stopping anybody from buying DVD's and learning CTE. I'm also not trying to convert any cult members over to reality. That ship has sailed. That leaves only entertainment. When you guys get boring I'll leave. :)

That pretty much admits that you are not here to provide anything constructive, but to troll other people for your own enjoyment. I hope the mods are listening.
 
That pretty much admits that you are not here to provide anything constructive, but to troll other people for your own enjoyment. I hope the mods are listening.

Uhh... OK, I guess. Show me a post where I am trolling.

I post here when I find something interesting. I was not in this forum for a long time when JB posted a video link from Stan to my youtube video. I found something interesting in it and posted my thoughts here. The reaction from Stan and you guys was interesting and informative so I continued to post.

Another guy posted another one of Stan's videos in the Aiming forum and I found something interesting in that, too. Apparently Stan found it interesting because it caused him to make two new videos, the first in 1.5 years. I found the ensuing conversation interesting...frustrating, but also interesting.

So go ahead, mohrt, and report me. What TOS violations am I guilty of -- Foul language? threatening remarks? Oh wait, those are violations against me that I mostly ignored because a back and forth of insults is ultimately boring and counterproductive. Just ask Spider Dave. How did that work out for him?

Generally you are a level headed guy so I'll chalk your remark up to a miscommunication, or maybe something you ate.
 
Newsflash -- your subconscious is involved. I do appreciate that you are paying proper respect to you subconscious. I'm sure Stan will say you are either doing it wrong, or don't understand what is happening. I think you do.



I'm glad it helps you play better, seriously. However, some people do care how it works, especially when certain claims are made to promote the product that are implausible. The other thing is, if more people took the attitude that it doesn't matter how anything works, we would probably still be living like Fred Flintstone. :smile:

How do those claims affect you?

You haven't purchased the DVD. You aren't going to purchase the DVD.

So what have you lost?
 
I'm not stopping anybody from buying DVD's and learning CTE. I'm also not trying to convert any cult members over to reality. That ship has sailed. That leaves only entertainment. When you guys get boring I'll leave. :)


Here's an observation.

Dan likes to throw the word "cult" around, but cults usually recruit members. I don't think I've ever seen any CTE users push it on anyone else.

In fact, when people have questions and are genuinely interested in learning the system. The users are always helpful and accommodating.



................
 
Uhh... OK, I guess. Show me a post where I am trolling.

I post here when I find something interesting. I was not in this forum for a long time when JB posted a video link from Stan to my youtube video. I found something interesting in it and posted my thoughts here. The reaction from Stan and you guys was interesting and informative so I continued to post.

Another guy posted another one of Stan's videos in the Aiming forum and I found something interesting in that, too. Apparently Stan found it interesting because it caused him to make two new videos, the first in 1.5 years. I found the ensuing conversation interesting...frustrating, but also interesting.

So go ahead, mohrt, and report me. What TOS violations am I guilty of -- Foul language? threatening remarks? Oh wait, those are violations against me that I mostly ignored because a back and forth of insults is ultimately boring and counterproductive. Just ask Spider Dave. How did that work out for him?

Generally you are a level headed guy so I'll chalk your remark up to a miscommunication, or maybe something you ate.

Lol. You straight up admit to trolling, and then play dumb when called on it.

At least when PJ was here he would contribute to the forum.
 
How do those claims affect you?

You haven't purchased the DVD. You aren't going to purchase the DVD.

So what have you lost?

You are baiting me to get into a conversation that has no possibility of a good outcome.

Let's try this: you can ignore me and I will ignore you and Neil. That way you can't be hurt by my trolling.

You can have the last word. Make it a good, slanderous one with some good jabs and a few distortions. Since that will be the last word I guess that means you have won.
 
Newsflash -- your subconscious is involved. I do appreciate that you are paying proper respect to you subconscious. I'm sure Stan will say you are either doing it wrong, or don't understand what is happening. I think you do.



I'm glad it helps you play better, seriously. However, some people do care how it works, especially when certain claims are made to promote the product that are implausible. The other thing is, if more people took the attitude that it doesn't matter how anything works, we would probably still be living like Fred Flintstone. :smile:

It's the best objective aiming system ever.
All of Stan's claims are true.
I know how to properly use. Why does it do what it does, who cares, it just does.
I have a great Lambros cue. Why does it hit so good, who cares, it just does
 
It's the best objective aiming system ever.
All of Stan's claims are true.
I know how to properly use. Why does it do what it does, who cares, it just does.
I have a great Lambros cue. Why does it hit so good, who cares, it just does

Everything is just your opinion.:)
Obejective my a$$, do all that studid sh!t and then try to add spin ..deflection into the shot. Does your head ever hurt after playing with pro1.?
 
Everything is just your opinion.:)
Obejective my a$$, do all that studid sh!t and then try to add spin ..deflection into the shot. Does your head ever hurt after playing with pro1.?

After you are on the shot line, spin is added the same regardless of the "system". BHE works quite nice. Or add your own flavor. There are lots of videos Stan has posted regarding spin and CTE, its not any more of an issue than it is with any other way of aiming.
 
Back
Top