I think it depends on the subject matter of the sticky threads. When I look at the current threads that are on the list, I don't think there are too many because each one serves a specific purpose. Over time, some of them will go away, as they should. JMO.Nostroke said:I'm probably in the minority but I'd like to see a limit on Stickys well below the number we have now. What ye say?
Nostroke said:I'm probably in the minority but I'd like to see a limit on Stickys well below the number we have now. What ye say?
PS- I know someone will be dying to ask this be made a sticky so let me ruin that bad joke now.
I agree that sometimes there can be too many sticky threads. I have to disagree about the raffle being a banner. That thread is constantly being updated when new items are added to the raffle. A banner wouldn't be sufficient. I realize that not all people care about the raffle but there are some that do care and are interested in the updates.Jerry Forsyth said:I would like to see no more than one sticky at a time. If you need more than that then start a sticky forum where folks can go. The polls are boring, the raffle can be handled with a banner ad, etc.
-Jerry
Nostroke said:I'm probably in the minority but I'd like to see a limit on Stickys well below the number we have now. What ye say?
Nostroke said:I'm probably in the minority but I'd like to see a limit on Stickys well below the number we have now. What ye say?
.
Williebetmore said:Strokenot,
I guess I actually like the stickies (no matter the amount). I believe that it encourages broader participation in the forum.
There are some zealots who basically read or review every post, every day (like me and possibly you); stickies for these members may be unnecessary and a little annoying. There are others, who only drop by occasionally or just look for a couple of interesting threads; the stickies REALLY help these members stay in touch with some of the activities and conversations that are geared towards including as much of the forum as possible.
When we were organizing the AZB room, we had many members who found out only because of the sticky. I like them; it doesn't take much energy to skip over them if you need to.
Of course, I remember the days of "the Silencer", when the forum was inundated with new threads - stickies really help on those days.
Nostroke said:Well you are kinda saying we have to force feed those who don't care enough to come around much. I dont see a need to that to the extent it is being done.
I understand your view though and it won't cause me to root too much against you in your match-up extravaganza hardly at all.
![]()
Nostroke said:Well you are kinda saying we have to force feed those who don't care enough to come around much. I dont see a need to that to the extent it is being done.
I understand your view though and it won't cause me to root too much against you in your match-up extravaganza hardly at all.
![]()
Nostroke said:PS- I know someone will be dying to ask this be made a sticky so let me ruin that bad joke now.
nipponbilliards said:Hey, what is with the new avatar![]()
![]()
![]()
![]()
![]()
![]()
From a bucket to an ebony Southwest(or is it?)? That is a nice little change.
Richard<<<<<always blames my losses on not having a southwest.![]()
JDB said:I think it depends on the subject matter of the sticky threads. When I look at the current threads that are on the list, I don't think there are too many because each one serves a specific purpose. Over time, some of them will go away, as they should. JMO.
Williebetmore said:Strokenot,
I guess I actually like the stickies (no matter the amount). I believe that it encourages broader participation in the forum.
...
Nostroke said:I'm probably in the minority but I'd like to see a limit on Stickys well below the number we have now. What ye say?
PS- I know someone will be dying to ask this be made a sticky so let me ruin that bad joke now.