Ohhh the good old, I have a secret technique......a classic.
SVB to Kick Off High Run Attempts
- Thread starter lfigueroa
- Start date
Maybe so, maybe not.
Maybe so maybe not. Provide your video for us to analyze.
One of the things that has to happen if you’re going to do what I’m doing here is to be read in on as much as possible about what is going on behind the scenes.
That allows you to do two things (more actually but let’s start with two). First, it lets you represent what is going on accurately. And second, it keeps you from accidentally stepping into doo-doo.
One other thing is that it allows you a good laugh when you see people say things they have no clue about.
I laugh a lot reading your posts.
Lou Figueroa
Ah the old "I am a pro at this" technique........ also a classic. The intrigue and behind-the-scenes mystery is a good way to gin up interest.....always keep them hanging.... my posts contain no useful information, just my opinions about actions I have seen you and your boss taking concerning John Schmidt.
I think its funny coming from someone claiming the honestly of others should be closely looked upon, when someone behind the curtains of this event made the decision to make the pocket miter angles parallel therefore making it harder for the pockets to reject badly hit balls so they would have a better chance of being pocketed, that's gaffing the pockets on purpose, or cheating the viewers of truthful high runs being earned on the merit of the players skills alone.
But what so funny about that, is that it shows the lack of knowledge of how 14.1 is truly played. Keep track of the shots that end a players run, and you'll find out that almost no runs end on a pocket rejecting a ball being pocketed, instead, .out runs are going to end because the ball being pocketed completely missed the pocket, or because no ball could be pocketed, or because if a scratched cue ball. This event has tarnished its own reputation pulling shit like that with the pockets, I guess you don't feel players can post high enough runs on their own, so there was a decision made to help them out without them knowing it
Are we supposed to be as impressed as you are that you have figured out who I am? Did you have to leave azb to do it?
Youre all mad coz this fake persona you created to spout unbelievable amounts of bs has returned reactions that you don't like?
I bet it's not the first time you've been around that circle. Hint for you.. It ain't us.
Thanks for the background. I've not been paying attention and did not know of this.
I think its funny coming from someone claiming the honestly of others should be closely looked upon, when someone behind the curtains of this event made the decision to make the pocket miter angles parallel therefore making it harder for the pockets to reject badly hit balls so they would have a better chance of being pocketed, that's gaffing the pockets on purpose, or cheating the viewers of truthful high runs being earned on the merit of the players skills alone.
But what so funny about that, is that it shows the lack of knowledge of how 14.1 is truly played. Keep track of the shots that end a players run, and you'll find out that almost no runs end on a pocket rejecting a ball being pocketed, instead, .out runs are going to end because the ball being pocketed completely missed the pocket, or because no ball could be pocketed, or because if a scratched cue ball. This event has tarnished its own reputation pulling shit like that with the pockets, I guess you don't feel players can post high enough runs on their own, so there was a decision made to help them out without them knowing it
Happy to amuse you -- we'll press on.
Lou Figueroa
So here's just a tiny example of inside info that I can let loose: according to what I have been told, JB and another associated account were preemptively banned from the LoPB FB page -- IOWs, despite what he says in this post, he could not have been a sponsor had he wanted to, lol.
Lou Figueroa
Last edited:
Lol, and yet I can watch it no problem. I guess your boss wouldn't want what I have to say about him said. Good move on his part because I would have challenged since of his nonsense for sure when I heard it. RIght now he is whining about people knocking by saying "it's a free stream what do you want?". So sad to be unappreciated...........
Of course, if I were really malicious I would use a team to jack with him. That's a technique I learned about from a "team" of people who were assigned to mess with one of my events.
That's not my intention though. I wish for the players to enjoy themselves and enjoy Bobby's hospitality. I hope he spends hundreds of thousands and gets his fill of 14.1 for as long as he wants to do it.
Despite what I say? I never said that I wanted to be a sponsor, nor that I could have been IF I had wanted to. OF COURSE your boss wouldn't ask me to be associated with anything he does. So save the "spin" for the gullible. I can think of many ways to use this "project" and associate my brand with it and your boss can do nothing about it. But like I said, I want nothing to do with it.
Attachments
Last edited:
lmao, that's your paranoia whispering to you again, John -- there was no "team."
Lou Figueroa
too funny
Maybe there was and maybe there wasn't. One thing is CERTAIN, you would never admit if there was. Doesn't matter at all though. IF I want to comment on the stream I will do so. But I don't because there is NO CONTENT I want to add. It's enough to say what I want to say here.
That's interesting, and the kind of data i was hoping to get.
25% to run 100 from an open position. Less than 5% failure on both break shots and on the shot after the break.
Very cool!
Thanks Bob.
Regarding the video library on the Facebook page for the Legends of Pocket Billiards Not Named Schmidt event.
1. One of the items you need to fix is the naming convention. What you have now is confusing and has gaps.
You could even add more info to the name, like SVB 1.1 (47) (112) (32) (147+) etc., to show the size of the runs in that particular video.
2. It would be better as well to end a video every time SVB takes a break, instead of these abrupt endings where the video ends before the last shot has come to a stop.
1. One of the items you need to fix is the naming convention. What you have now is confusing and has gaps.
On the Facebook page, the listed videos are:somewhat haphazardly named.
Live: SVB Day 2 High Run CHallenge
Day 2 - SVB - the lengends of pocket bnilliards 14.1 High run ..2.54.45
SVB - the legends of pocket billiards 14.1 high run ...1.55.49
SVB - the lengends of pocket billiards 14.1 high run ...0:01.48
SVB Night session 14.1 High Run attempt ...0.56.43
SVB Day 1 High run attempts ...2:57.09
SVB Day 1 The Legneds of pocket billiards 14.1 high run challenge ...2.27.13
SVB - 14.1 High Run Challenge Begins tonight ... 1.41.34
You should probably use a naming convention something like
SVB 1.1,
SVB 1.2,
SVB 1.3,
then
SVB 2.1,
SVB 2.2,
SVB 2.3 etc.
You could even add more info to the name, like SVB 1.1 (47) (112) (32) (147+) etc., to show the size of the runs in that particular video.
2. It would be better as well to end a video every time SVB takes a break, instead of these abrupt endings where the video ends before the last shot has come to a stop.
Last edited: