Dennis beat Shane in an all around in 2012 on TAR and Shane thumped Dennis in 10-ball in June of last year. Ask Dennis if he wants any more of that.
a lot WOULD match him.... but they dont
Dennis beat Shane in an all around in 2012 on TAR and Shane thumped Dennis in 10-ball in June of last year. Ask Dennis if he wants any more of that.
Of course he does if he's getting a free roll.
Shane never wins overseas ... blah, blah. Since he can't win, put your money where your mouth is. I offered 5:1 he would not win the US Open and 4:1 he would not win the Derby. These are US events he has already won and is the favorite. What odds (it's got to be 3 times that) are you offering in these overseas events he can't win?
I'll also take Shane and you can pick any other player not from the host country (I do believe travel and home field advantage mean something). BET.
I'm talking about the race to 100 ten ball. Shane is now having to play one-pocket, banks, 8-ball, etc...because nobody can fade him in a long set of 9 or 10 ball.
or they CAN'T - shane is on the other side of the globe. could that also be the reason why shane did not participate in last year's China and Japan Open?
if you think you are the best, you go find someone who claims to be the best and beat him on his turf. you do not invite him in your homecourt and beat him there. in PI we call it "dayo" or foreigner. you go be a dayo and beat him on his table.
Oh I thought the best players play all the games ,, funny how some think now 10 ball is the game that decides who's best
Let by old lady and her 12 mph break bust the balls up for a Dennis , Shane matchup and see if Dennis needs 15 on the wire
Funny how his break is not one if this variances
1
I need a translator for this post.
I need a translator for this post.
If.if. if....if you take shanes break away.....if you put a patch on his non dominant eye.....thats ridiculous talk....
The last time SVB went to the Philippines he went undefeated gambling against the top Pinoys...UNDEFEATED... I give them credit for trying though...
The point he's making, and that I've tried to make too, is that 'short' races aren't as unfair
as people make them out to be, and that really long races are probably overrated/overkill.
Say you have two guys who play REALLY close.
One player has only a 4% edge on the other, in terms of skill.
Say they play an oldschool TAR-type, race to 100.
IF you have the players clocked correctly, the underdog still has a 28.6% chance of winning the set.
Definitely enough chance for an upset. Even racing to 100 doesn't GUARANTEE the best player wins.
Now let's drop it to a real short race to 11.
now it's 42.6% for the underdog to win.
But almost no tournament involves playing just one dude for a single race to 11.
But even if it were, is that really unfair compared to the race to 100?
The difference between race to 100 (28.6%) and race to 11 (42.6%) is just 14%.
In other words, you're increasing the length of the race by 9 times, just to give the better
player a 14% better chance of winning, when he's probably going to win anyway.
All those extra hours just to give the better player that slight 1-in-7 edge.
Now factor in the intangibles. Mood, momentum, jetlag, and the biggest one of all...
ROLLS. Those things, added together, probably have much more impact than race length,
in terms of whether the better player might get beat by a weaker one.
Last time I checked no turneys are a race to 100 so it proves nothing
The event was the last time he went to the Philippines he bet his cash in the pool room, SVB won 7 sets lost 0 against various Pinoys racing to 23, 25 27, etc. beating the likes of DeLuna, Biado, Gomez, etc.
Funny how his break is not one if this variances
1