I agree... and disagree.
It is my understanding Bar Box 8 Ball is the most popular pool game in America. I think there are a few reasons for this.
The tables are small and it is easier to get more of them in a room.
There are no real long shots on a bar box when compared to a 9' table, so making a ball should be easier. That makes the game more fun for the average player and more shooters want to do it.
Some say 8 Ball on a Bar Box is harder as there are many balls in a smaller space making it harder to get clear shots at your chosen balls. I think that depends on ones skill level.
When some one is first learning to shoot we put the cue ball and the object ball close together and close to a pocket so they can make a ball and be encouraged. We don't put them on a 9' table and have them shoot long shots.
All though I am personally not a Bar Box fan, I see room for play on both sizes and if it promotes pool in a good way then go for it.
I am slowly coming to terms with the fact that thousands do not share my opinion of Bar Box tables and I respect their opinion and their right to have it.
I have a good 9' table, if I had room I would also get a 7' Diamond. I know a guy that sold his 9' Diamond and bought a 7' Diamond as that is the size he usually plays on in tournaments and league.
I guess I look at Bar Box 8 Ball as a good game for the "masses".
I understand 10 ball and 9 ball on a 9 foot table, but 8 ball? Won't that just make the game easier instead of harder?
what about folks that play on both, consistently? What are the "real" world results?
For me, I run out more on a 7 foot table then a 9. And if someone put a gun to my head and told me I had to play SVB a race to 5 for $10,000, but I got to pick the table, I'd pick a 7 foot.
If some APA 3 wanted to play me a race to 5 for a $10,000 because someone had a gun to their head, but I got to pick the table, I'd pick the 9 foot.
Now, your results may vary, but this is what I'd do if given the choice based on the above.
Would anyone do the same, or would you reverse it ??
I feel that ever since Diamond came out with a seven-foot table that plays like a
Championship table.....the size is irrelevant....cloth and balls tend to be the same quality.
The old bar boxes with rough cloth and non-standard balls gave regular bar players an edge.
...their game reminded me of the snooker players in the UK,,,more center ball...
...and less finesse.
So, if you aren't talking about weighted or over-size cue balls, and a horse blanket for cloth....
....I'll bet on the best nine-foot player on a seven-footer also.
You would loose your money. Back in the day Keith turned many championship players into crybabbies on a 7ft Valley as he was a monster playing on them, and if I had to bet....the best pool he ever played was on bar tables with the oversized cue ball. It's like there's this line between tables, players on 9fts didn't want to play on bar tables, and bar table monsters didn't want to play on 9fts.
If you re-read my post, Glen, Ithink you'll see that we don't disagree.
I rarely played bar boxes in the action days...and i felt they had a big edge on me.
...I was stuck 24 games playing nine-ball on an 8-footer with an over-size cue ball......
...got him to an 8-foot gold Crown in a pool hall....he needed at least the 7 there.
my point was, the Diamond 7-footers took away the bar specialist's edge.
You would loose your money. Back in the day Keith turned many championship players into crybabbies on a 7ft Valley as he was a monster playing on them, and if I had to bet....the best pool he ever played was on bar tables with the oversized cue ball. It's like there's this line between tables, players on 9fts didn't want to play on bar tables, and bar table monsters didn't want to play on 9fts.