JoeyInCali said:
OK, review your own products then and let's see if you have some unfavorable reviews of them such as false advertising or misrepresentation.
And even if you are 100% correct in your review, you are still desparaging Predator b/c you don't sell them and you sell a competing brands/s.
It'd be like someone who distributes JBL speakers posting on the forum and disproving Bose's product claims/advertisement.
IT's still competition desparaging.
Let me ask you then how is one supposed to go about it when a competing product claims to be the best and another company disagrees with that assertion?
We are just talking business theory here.
If I have product A and you have product B and I say that product A is the best in the industry what does that make your product? Inferior to mine. Am I not disparaging your product by claiming mine to be better?
If mine is better should I claim that?
If mine is not better should I claim that it is?
Please tell me how businesses should market their products so that no one is disparaged?
Do you not have the right to challenge my claims of superiority if you sell product B?
I don't see how in the WORLD I am disparaging Predator when I clearly sate that in my opinion, based on my extensive experience, that my findings are such and such. If so then are they not disparaging all other jump cues by saying that in their opinion, based on their extensive experience, that their findings are such and such?
How is it a disparaging remark to say that the cue is good but not "the best"? God forbid that I disagree with a marketing statement. I am positive that you find some in our catalog that I also disagree with, I don't write all the copy for all the products we carry. We also carry products that I don't personally recommend and when asked my opinion as to why I give it freely.
That doesn't mean however that others don't get great satisfaction out of the products I don't like.
And I generally don't appoint myself to be the reviewer of all products because I would throw out half of the crap that is on the market currently and replace it with crap that really works well. And that applies to all the crap sold by all the companies that sell it. Us included.
But in some cases - like cases and jump cues - I happen to have more than a passing interest and so I speak up frequently about these tow subjects. You know this, you have known it for years and years and years.
So now, for whatever reason, you want to make this about purely competition. Ok great. Then we will make it about pure competition.
Predator claims their jump cue is the best. (most accurate). I claim that it is not more accurate than a Fury Jump Cue. There. Simple. Two competing companies two competing statements. Try both cues and decide for yourself.
But wait, perhaps we should try and define what is meant by "accuracy" so that we are on the same page. Who gets to define that? Predator because they make the claim? Okay, then I'd like to throw in the word "control" and the word "comfort" and the word "feel" as well to add some other factors that I happen to think are important in this discussion.
Unless of course you feel that because Predator has made a strong statement of superiority then it should go uncontested and unchallenged. Is that how you feel? Should a strong business be allowed to make such statements of superiority without challenge simply because they have a "name"?
Predator is more than welcome to come on this forum and explain to all of us how they arrived at the claim of being the best. Nothing could be better for consumers than to see various manufacturers having to interact with their prospective customers and back up their claims. Nothing could be better for dealers who want to sell those products than to be able to be on solid ground when repeating the claims of the suppliers.
Or am I missing something here?