This is as far as my reach extends. Hopefully JCIN reads it and likes it.
Some great ideas there. Thank you for sharing them. Over the years most of them have come up at one time or another and what you are proposing is very close to what we are finalizing now.
The devil, as always, is in the details and I just dont want to come out with this grandiose detailed ranking plan we have been working on only to figure out a week later their are giant holes in it.
The biggest issues at the moment are player scheduling, the logistics of including international players and simple things like what do you call the divisions ? I like the Tier 1 and Tier 2 designations a lot.
I like the idea of points but am concerned about getting too in depth with a ranking system and being married to an order dictated by points. As an example the UFC doesnt use points. They have a somewhat loose list of top contenders....this allows them the flexibility to make the best matches at the time. I like that option a lot.
One major concern is how many events will the audience support? I think one every three to four weeks is the sweet spot. Much more than that and it will burn out the audience and make it ard to promote properly. Perfect example is TAR 27 this week. Its the worst job of promoting a match I have ever done. I have no doubt when its over lots of people will say "I didnt even know about that." Its due to several reasons but mainly trying to do too much in a limited time.
This is a great thread and I have gotten some good ideas from it. Thank you to everyone for sharing your knowledge and opinions.