Alrighty then!! Here's my take on this entire 'good feedback/bad feedback' issue:
First off...if all that is going to be allowed/tolerated here is positive feedback, then really, what is the point to all the posts and sticky? To me, it just becomes a waste of bandwidth.
While having positive feedback posts can be valuable, so can negative feedback,, and for the very same reasons. Trust me, I REALLY want to know when things go awry...so that I may avoid similar headaches/monetary losses.
While it is very easy to say something positive, saying something negative is a bit trickier proposition. Often times, matters can be worked out privately. When this is not the case, one may wish to start out being somewhat generalized, and UNEMOTIONAL, as to the issue. And avoiding naming names right off the get-go may help to resolve some issues as well. ONLY AS A LAST RESORT!...should the offending member's name be unveiled. If the first two steps do not acheive results, then usually the offending member isn't willing to 'make right'.
Now...I am really against these 'roll-over' threads as of late. Get it hashed out in one thread...not over 3,4,5.....you get the picture.
Bad shafts.....should have been handles originally as...."I ordered some shafts from a respected cuemaker, and they are just not really 'up to snuff', and here's why, and any suggestions as to how to handle this situation?" The responses may well have been positive and productive than immediately naming the cuemaker's name, which can just get the whole 'good guy/bad guy' thing going.
The above could also hold true for anyone unhappy about any workmanship thay recieve from either a cuemaker or a cue repair person.
At any rate, it is really important to try and keep level heads, and keep the emotions out of it completely....once they enter in, usually a possible resolution is all but out the window. It really is possible to post a dissatisfaction and be nice about it.
Example: Shorty sent a cue to Proficient to have some work done. He was not happy with the result, for whatever reason. Scot responded, in a very unemotional manner, and eventually the matter was resolved....with a whole lot less unpleasantness than has been exhibited as of late.
As I have already stated, there is really no point to feedback if it is only going to be positive. If that is the way it's going to be, then just do away with it completely, and caveat emptor!!
Lisa...who truly believes that you will catch more flies with honey than with vinegar!
First off...if all that is going to be allowed/tolerated here is positive feedback, then really, what is the point to all the posts and sticky? To me, it just becomes a waste of bandwidth.
While having positive feedback posts can be valuable, so can negative feedback,, and for the very same reasons. Trust me, I REALLY want to know when things go awry...so that I may avoid similar headaches/monetary losses.
While it is very easy to say something positive, saying something negative is a bit trickier proposition. Often times, matters can be worked out privately. When this is not the case, one may wish to start out being somewhat generalized, and UNEMOTIONAL, as to the issue. And avoiding naming names right off the get-go may help to resolve some issues as well. ONLY AS A LAST RESORT!...should the offending member's name be unveiled. If the first two steps do not acheive results, then usually the offending member isn't willing to 'make right'.
Now...I am really against these 'roll-over' threads as of late. Get it hashed out in one thread...not over 3,4,5.....you get the picture.
Bad shafts.....should have been handles originally as...."I ordered some shafts from a respected cuemaker, and they are just not really 'up to snuff', and here's why, and any suggestions as to how to handle this situation?" The responses may well have been positive and productive than immediately naming the cuemaker's name, which can just get the whole 'good guy/bad guy' thing going.
The above could also hold true for anyone unhappy about any workmanship thay recieve from either a cuemaker or a cue repair person.
At any rate, it is really important to try and keep level heads, and keep the emotions out of it completely....once they enter in, usually a possible resolution is all but out the window. It really is possible to post a dissatisfaction and be nice about it.
Example: Shorty sent a cue to Proficient to have some work done. He was not happy with the result, for whatever reason. Scot responded, in a very unemotional manner, and eventually the matter was resolved....with a whole lot less unpleasantness than has been exhibited as of late.
As I have already stated, there is really no point to feedback if it is only going to be positive. If that is the way it's going to be, then just do away with it completely, and caveat emptor!!
Lisa...who truly believes that you will catch more flies with honey than with vinegar!
Last edited: