This Is An Absolute Disgrace........

cmsmith9 said:
True..and his stakehorse made an excellent investment. But the A-D players that played in this event, might not have the luxury of a backer that John did.
Your talking to his stakehorse......way to go PURDMAN.That was some exciting shit.
 
Last edited:
I hear there are some good things in the works coming from the Seminol's for the Florida Pro Tour. I agree that these payouts aren't exciting, but I'm hopeful for the future.
 
jimmy-leggs said:
All it takes is a LEGITIMATE business person to run it.

I hope your not saying that the Tribe is not a legitimate business. They run a highly successful mega billion dollar business. Their largesse towards pool is something that is not recognized by the pool world as much as they deserve, and they have been supporting pool for a long time too.

To get 78 players to play in a regional event, you need to have lots of shortstops (AKA easy draw) and enthusiasts (AKA byes to the pros) to play. 1k entry fee will weed out ALL of the above mentioned AND a good percentage of "dont have a job, just play pool" folks as well. Sure you might get 78 players to fork over 1k, but it wont be at a regional event and you would be hard pressed to get that at even a national event. I hope some promoter gets some sort of tour together that can make me eat my words. I really do.
 
jimmy-leggs said:
All it takes is a LEGITIMATE business person to run it.

A legitimate business person with contacts in the industry, the skill to court sponsors, the diplomacy to run a tour, the intelligence to put together a solid business model and a rather large bank account to get things rolling. It's not just a matter of ANY business person wanting to promote/produce a tour, it takes quite a bit in my opinion.
 
Roy Steffensen said:
What is the entryfee? And how many players get their entry back? That's the important thing...
Entry fee for the Florida Pro Tour is only $150.00. I've played in a couple and with the exception of the fiasco in Melbourne ( 97 players and only 9 tables) it's a very well organized tournament.
 
uwate said:
I hope your not saying that the Tribe is not a legitimate business. They run a highly successful mega billion dollar business. Their largesse towards pool is something that is not recognized by the pool world as much as they deserve, and they have been supporting pool for a long time too.

To get 78 players to play in a regional event, you need to have lots of shortstops (AKA easy draw) and enthusiasts (AKA byes to the pros) to play. 1k entry fee will weed out ALL of the above mentioned AND a good percentage of "dont have a job, just play pool" folks as well. Sure you might get 78 players to fork over 1k, but it wont be at a regional event and you would be hard pressed to get that at even a national event. I hope some promoter gets some sort of tour together that can make me eat my words. I really do.
I'm NOT saying the tribe at all,just in general .They do a great job and if they make pool payouts bigger I commend them.
 
pooldawg1 said:
I gave up a carreer in the military to play pool.. Huge mistake. I could have retired by now. Pool payouts is pathetic face it, it is no more than a hobby anymore. Why do you think so many players are quiting, or resorting to selling drugs, ripping off carwashes, casinos and many other things. Only the top 20 players in the world are actually making money. Why don't you ask the promoters like Charlie Williams or Allen Hopkins how much they are making. I bet they are making much more than any pool player.
At least Charlie and Allen are doing something for the game.
 
$3500 thats 100 gallons of gas, 20 years ago a pro tournment would pay 10K and gas was 79 cents a gallon, it aint looking good, I have one friend who is a pro, now he is a poker player full time and has a nice house cars etc. sadly I dont see pool making a turn for along time, what do the rookies have to motivate them to become great players, i play because I love to play but man if I had the talent to earn a living playing pool I wouldnt be doing it.
 
uwate said:
If the entry fee was $1,000.00 you would not see 78 players in a regional tournament.

Being that it was a Florida tournament, and I have some familiarity with alot of the players, I eyeballed the bracket to see who I thought would put up 1k. There are at least 20-30 guys who would not have played I think if the entry fee was 1k and thats being pretty generous. It might in fact be only 17 players who want to put up 1k, making it still 17k in prize money.

Cut it off at 16 players.........
After you add in the Seminole Tribe MAJOR contribution and the local pool hall's contribution. I think we may be up to about $24,000.00 with Entry fee of $1,000 and 16 players. Pay four places (25% of the field)$10,000 for first, $7500 for second, $4000 for third and $2,500 for fourth.
Since it is small field, make them play a LONG SET maybe race to 30 or so to give every player a chance to let out their stroke.

AZ could come up with a horse or two and one or two thousand in cash to act as a stake horse. I wouldn't be a bit surprised if some of the other forums wouldn't step up to the plate with a horse of their own. I know Billiards Digest has some well to do forum members and RSB has members all over the world. I would be willing to bet that those three forums alone would belly up the entry fee for a player of their choice.

Then you could always send Smorgasbored around with some football cards I mean some pool cards to generate some additional funds. Skip that idea, he would just eat and drink the profits until there was nothing left.

Anyway, it would be nice to see higher prize money if the players would belly-up the larger entry fees. Perhaps then, the sponsors might take a close look at putting up a spot light or two.

I would like to see a winner take all tournament with 16 players each putting up $1000 entry fee. Stakehorses would be willing to send their horses to the tournament to shoot a toothpick at a lumberyard. ($1,000 to win $25,000) (added money at least $9,000) Add in casino money, send in EXTRA TALL CUPS of heavy expresso from Starbucks (a potential sponsor) for Jay Helfer as commentator and you have another tournament made for ESPN.
JoeyA
 
Ad revenue powers sports payouts, not entry fees; and let's face it, pool never had the right backing and never will....sad, but it's no more complicated than that.
 
Pay It Forward

I had the opportunity to meet Kevin at the tournament yesterday. Kevin is heading up the new firm that's attempting to make a huge success of the Seminole's Florida Pro Tour. Your concerns about the money might be better addressed to him. He is posting in AZ Billiards "Seminole Florida Pro Tour" section. (yes, they have their own section)
He is also looking into a Senior's tournament.
Perhaps someone should post there or at least put a link to this thread in that section.... imo
Doug
 
BRKNRUN said:
However....one of the most popular events in Golf happens to be the Ryder Cup....This is not "a lonely man" and usually has quite a bit of fist pumping.

The problem is that pool is considered a "game" by the masses (out side of hard core players) Golf was this way for a long time. Golf was only considered a game and actually was not publicly accepted as a "sport" until the mid 80's. (Even one of the most famous names in Golf was actually a lawer and just played Golf "on the side" so to speak)

These days its now actually "cool" to be on the Golf team....and public schools have better and better teams now....

My Freshman year in High School they almost did not have enough kids to make a team. My Sr year, the school had two bus loads of kids that tried out for the (10 man roster) Golf team.

Pool teams in high school are non-existent in Arizona, and I doubt any high school in the united states has a pool team...

Get that introduced and give the kids something to play for and you will see the development of kids that now play for the "sport" of pool rather than just to play a "game of pool"

Right now there is no reason for American kids to play pool...other than recreation....No development = no future.....JMO

If you are saying golf was not publicly considered a sport until the middle of the 1980's, you are WAY, WAY off the mark.
 
pineknot said:
If you are saying golf was not publicly considered a sport until the middle of the 1980's, you are WAY, WAY off the mark.


It may have officially been considered a sport, but the general public perception of Golf was that it was a game for the rich snobs and in Public High Schools (at least from where I am from) if you were on the Golf team you were lucky if you only got laughed at... By the time I was a SR. walking across campus with a team bag received similar respect as the football team wearing the team jersey on game day.

Greg Norman and John Daly had a lot to due with getting Golf into the non Golfing Public eye....Then when Tiger came along he took it even deeper into the minority Public eye.

Tiger caused people to start Golfing that otherwise may have never even thought about picking up a golf club.

Don't worry...I am fully aware that Arnie had his army and Jack brought the masses as well. But they did not have the same effect to the non Golfing Public as Greg Norman & John Daly.

Chi and Lee had similar effect to a different minority masses.

Pool actually has an advantage over Golf... Not everyone can pick up a Golf club and instantly play a round of golf.

Pretty much anyone can pick up a cue and complete a game of 8-ball.
Getting a base of High School students to join a pool team to compete against other schools would probably not be that difficult. I am sure there would be many that would join.

On the other hand (currently) if you walk across a high school campus and ask every one if they new who Earl Strickland is, there would probably be few that could give you a correct answer.... ask the same students who John Daly is and you will get many that know.

My point is that many students never get introduced to (competitive) pool until at least after high school. Kids want to compete so they will pick a sport that is available and learn about it. And when they get older that sport gets built and carried on.

Pool must start at this level if it is to be successful long term. Other wise the only players they will get are people taking off from their day jobs to go play in an event.

The reason you see more and more top Asian players I would bet is that there is some kind of competitive pool in the high schools there.
 
Last edited:
jimmy-leggs said:
Something better happen for these guys and girls or they will be giving it up for real jobs.

Pool players wil never get real jobs. Think about it, people have been saying this FOREVER and the "pros" still show up to play.

So why would any, for profit, tournament pay more when they do not have to. Think of McDonalds. They only pay minimun wage. Why? Because employees will still show up for work. Guaranteed. So why should they pay out more than they need to?


Anyways, the pros will show up no matter what the payout is. They always have and always will /shrug


I'd suggest they ban together and only show up for good payouts or host their own tournaments. They could have the power, quite easily, if they would just get serious and look out for eachother...


Such is the life as a pool addict, I suppose...
 
Efren beat Ronnie 21-19 in 10-ball also at One Side last Friday before leaving for Guam Saturday night.....

Update on Efren`s games since his return from Guam last Tuesday....Tues.he beat Lolong with 5,9,10 handicap. Wed. beat Bert Pasay for 2 sets of 5,9,10 then beat Ronnie in 10 ball, Thurs. beat Jerome with 8,10 handicp then Ronnie in 10 ball again, Fri. beat Gomez also with 8,10 handicap then lost to Ronnie hill-hill in rotation, Sat. he beat Ronnie in rotation.

you can't blame effie for not bothering to travel to Florida in that kind of tournament..
he most likely earned more than his fellow pinoys in the US just gambling at oneside cafe in manila plus that exhibition game in Guam..
 
UWPoolGod1 said:
You know how to build the prize pool? CHARGE MORE MONEY FOR THE EVENT!

Pros are usually sponsored by a corporation or an individual anyways. They can either front the whole money themselves or get someone to put it in for them. That same 78 person tourney with a $1000 entry would have a prize pool of...that right...$78,000. All of the entrants there believe they have a legitimate shot at winning so they should not have any qualms about putting up the money. Then at least they could pay $15K or so for first.

I do not mind them only paying through 24th place because that is 30% of the field. My local $5/entry bar tourneys usually pay 1/3 of the field. You just cannot pay everyone.

Either that or a group of people have to get out and pound the street for getting corporate sponsorship to start another pro tour. Get Budweiser or whatever to put their name on the tour and put in a few mil for the rights to broadcast on ESPN or whatever. I know this has all been said before.
Payouts can't be more if the entrance fee is the ultimate payout.
 
cuechick said:
I think you the nail on the head and was thinking the same thing. What was the entry fee for this? The WPBA is 500.00 per event. If one thing that came out of the IPT, that might be good, was that it proved players are willing to put up bigger entry fees for bigger payouts.

I have to disagree here. It is the very reason the IPT folded up.
 
uwate said:
If the entry fee was $1,000.00 you would not see 78 players in a regional tournament.

Being that it was a Florida tournament, and I have some familiarity with alot of the players, I eyeballed the bracket to see who I thought would put up 1k. There are at least 20-30 guys who would not have played I think if the entry fee was 1k and thats being pretty generous. It might in fact be only 17 players who want to put up 1k, making it still 17k in prize money.

You just nailed it. Now take into consideration that in the USA right now, Florida is the pool mecca. If you had an event like that where I live in Texas for example, You would be lucky to have 6 entries.

The IPT advertised gazillions and couldn't fill a $1000 qualifier or a $1500 one.

The primary goal for any promoter is to fill the room for the facilitator of the regional event. If this is not accomplished, why would he want to do this. Rarely is a profit shown at all.

If the entry is too steep, the locals aren't going to enter, thus being embarrased, and not going to show up. There are the usual favorites who will pay and then some like myself dumb enough to support anything. Finally the event is looked at as so so event at best, and next year, the local owner has no energy for it.

Here in Texas, we have liquor laws which prohibit any booze vendor or distributor from adding any money to any event facilitated by anyone with an existing liquor license. The reasoning for this, I haven't a dam clue. I've argued it and tried to get around it now for the past 5 years.

Newspapers and local TV flat out refuse to cover any event at all stating that pool doesn't fit the image of the city. I near gagged on that one. I guess their reporting all the crimes at night fits the city's image more.

There are sponsors wo put on events and sometimes ahamed of the added money. {I have been there many tiems.} If we can't put it on TV, sponsors are not intrested in putting on the party.

Next, the existing events on TV ain't getting the job done, or there would be more sponsors due to larger audiences.

Again, IMO, pool's biggest issue is that there is no plan to make it better and those who have tried are tired of bumping their heads against walls. There is no real governing body and therefore nobody to construct a plan for the game.

Sure we have leagues and the BCA and so forth, but what is their intrest in this game. What goes back into it? Who has even looked into getting it into the schools as soccer did not so many years ago, and look where it is now. It seems to me that pool needs to be built from the ground up. If not, where is the audience going to come from? ESPN ain't going to build it! They have been at it for 30 plus years and we aren't 1 dollar better off.

This plan would not happen overnight either, it would take time. If we take an honest look at it thiugh, what is there to lose? We had better develope the sport by developing the youth.
 
look what the v.n.e.a. is doing .....they run a great event , but the money they make versus the payouts is a joke .....
 
In my opinion, the national leagues make their contributions and provide their national tournaments, which have their purpose, which should be acknowledged for what they do, and not overlooked. OTOH, the payouts for many of their events seem meager in comparison to what could be done.

Just seems that more could be done and that it could be done better...

I don't think it'll occur until people are willing and able to set the box (this is the way it's been done for so long) aside for a moment, and consider what could occur if we give alternatives a chance...
 
Back
Top