Thoughts on cuemaker's transition from 57 inch, 58 inch and over 60 inch cue.

I think the transition to 58" cues began with Jan Janes and Joss Cues.

For the first few years we were in business together Dan and I made all custom cues. Most were 57" but Dan played with a 58" cue and so did Buddy Dennis and a few other players on the East Coast.

When we split up Dan started to make limited production runs of the same model cue. He settled on a length of 58".

This was before Viking or McDermott.

I continued to make whatever the customer wanted but eventually started playing with a 58" cue.

Bill S.
 
In just the last few months I have sold at least 10 Cues that were 60" long. Out of those ten, 9 have called back and ordered at least 3 more Cues. I did have my first return since November, the buyer said the Cue was great but he didn't like the hit, he gave me a great review and got a full refund with a smile.

The longest I have made were 62", some people like to break with them.

I am 5'10" and I like playing a 60" Cue but tell a guy who stands 6'5" to try a 57" Cue, I hope he hits you with it, just kidding. I have had guys that tall love the 62".

I have buyers who are 5'5" and they want a much shorter cue, makes sense to me.

I have another customer who wants 12 more cues, some for the kids will be around 54". I sent him a cue last week, he could not figure out WHY I thought he should try a 60" Cue and I said if he didn't like it, I would give a full refund. The day he got it was when he told me he wants 12 more cues.

SIMPLE MORAL OF THE STORY? If I told all these people that cues are only 57"-58" they would have just smiled and told me to have a good day, my head would still in the sand wondering, why didn't they buy?


Hey glad to hear business for you.

The kid ordering 12 more cues is hilarious,
He must have a different cue for every situation,
Break, break jump, draw , follow , middle, centre ball, left english, right english, jump, masse , kick etc lol

But behind what u say, why does people feel better with longer cue when logically speaking, hits softer n deflects more than a standard 58 cue? And thoughts or feedback from your customers ?
 
I think the transition to 58" cues began with Jan Janes and Joss Cues.

For the first few years we were in business together Dan and I made all custom cues. Most were 57" but Dan played with a 58" cue and so did Buddy Dennis and a few other players on the East Coast.

When we split up Dan started to make limited production runs of the same model cue. He settled on a length of 58".

This was before Viking or McDermott.

I continued to make whatever the customer wanted but eventually started playing with a 58" cue.

Bill S.

You are a top cuemaker sir,
which do u still prefer for playability with the modern level of professional pool ? 57' or 58 ' ?

Do you know if a 57 hits stiffer with lower deflection and better feedback compared to a 58' cue ?


Thanks
 
Cezar,

I really don't think there is a measurable difference between 57" and 58"..

When you go to 60" I think the cue becomes more flexible than a 57" but than can be engineered out of it.

Bill S.
 
Cezar,

I really don't think there is a measurable difference between 57" and 58"..

When you go to 60" I think the cue becomes more flexible than a 57" but than can be engineered out of it.

Bill S.

Do you remember building a cue for Ronnie Sypher with a long butt and short shaft for playing on bar tables? It was over all I think 57".

Regarding your other post, when the change happened it seemed like everyone did it about the same time. Some production cues like Palmer and Viking didn't make the change right away but it was not long.

I had a Ginacue around 1969 and it came 58" from Ginacue, I didn't specify it.
 
Against the norm, Jimmy Reid played with a 56" and Pat Flemming of Accu-stats played with a 54". Many billiard players play with cues like 52 and 54" cues. Stranglely billiard players also play with very light cue like 13 to 15 ounce. Cue dymamics can be interesting.

No good for stroke slippers.
I think it just depends on your bridge length and type of stroke.
Taller people do not necessarily need longer cues imo.
Archer is tall. He doesn't shoot with a long cue.
When Efren came over, he had a 61" cue . It favored his long bridge and stroke slip.
 
The best hitting cue I ever tried was a snooker cue at 57 inces, full splice ash, 1 piece. It had a rather unconventional taper as well. That cue sang when you hit the ball right and it felt like an extension of my arm. I've tried some pool cues that were good, but the hit and overall feel of that cue is so far unmatched. I've been toying with the idea of making a cue like that myself (actually I'd have to make two, one for pool as well), but I don't have the space at the moment. I might go buy a couple of ash blanks and let them cure for a bit as I might get more space in the future. I'm fascinated with the idea of building a cue entirely with hand tools, and I'm pretty handy with those, so maybe I'll try.

I believe the length of the cue is very important to the hit. What most people that want longer cues do, is to buy a cue that is 60 inches and then slapping on a 31 inch Predator or other ld shaft. That's a surefire way of getting a cue that hits like a dead fish. I've never tried a cue with an extended ld shaft that even approached an acceptable hit. If you want the cue to hit well, it must be built differently, not just by the numbers and extended Performance wise of course most cues are up to the task of propelling the cue ball in whatever direction you want, but when it comes to feel, length is important..
 
Last edited:
I'm 6' 4" and have played with cues over 58" for a long time. Usually 59 to 59.5" ..A short bit ago Joe Gold made me an ebony player at 57 inches and every time I play with that cue I play well. I don't really notice the cue being shorter but that could be that I'm not leaving myself in a position where that would matter..On the flip side the cue Captain Bob just made for me is 58.5" and I really don't notice the length difference either. NOW with the 4" extension Joe made for me, the Ebony player at 61" is a "poll" for sure but still feels good...
 
Something big has changed recently though. Players are playing with lighter cues that are balanced much farther forward as well as thinner shafts. My personal cue now is 571/2" 19oz, 13mm shaft and balanced 38" from the tip as well as a thinner butt. I have never played with anything like this before.

What I have discovered is, a more forward balanced cue seems to play and feel, at least to me, like a heavier cue. I am not just talking about feel but the way the balls respond. I used to play by the way with a 20oz +, 13.25 mm for decades.

I have the luxury of experimenting with cues because I can build my own cue. I would hate to be ordering a new cue today and waiting a year there are so many things that can effect the way the cue feels.

I find it interesting that u feel like the forward balanced cues feel like a heavier cue to you. The first time I encountered Nova cues that had a strong forward balance built into them, I felt like that the forward balance seemed to make the cue feel lighter, just the opposite of your sense of feel.
I have looked for forward balance in all new cues I have acquired since then even as my weight preference continued to go to actual lighter weights.

I agree with u that many things can effect the way a cue feels. To me the total combination of construction elements totally effect the kind of feel that each cue will produce. Unfortunately I have yet to find any way of measuring someone's own sense of feel, and have yet to discover any means of measuring the type of hit that a cue produces. If those 2 things could be measured it would make things easier to match up someone with a specific type of cue.
 
I find it interesting that u feel like the forward balanced cues feel like a heavier cue to you. The first time I encountered Nova cues that had a strong forward balance built into them, I felt like that the forward balance seemed to make the cue feel lighter, just the opposite of your sense of feel.
I have looked for forward balance in all new cues I have acquired since then even as my weight preference continued to go to actual lighter weights.

I agree with u that many things can effect the way a cue feels. To me the total combination of construction elements totally effect the kind of feel that each cue will produce. Unfortunately I have yet to find any way of measuring someone's own sense of feel, and have yet to discover any means of measuring the type of hit that a cue produces. If those 2 things could be measured it would make things easier to match up someone with a specific type of cue.
I think what you feel is a more balanced feel. In other words you don't feel like you are supporting the weight of the cue in you grip hand it is distributed.


I feel the same thing but when I am down on the ball when I stroke the cue, maybe because I am pushing more of the weight, feels like a heavier cue.

If I pick up a lighter cue with a back balance it feels like I can't make it go straight like it has a mind of it's own. Move the balance forward and it is like a gyro the way it straightens out.

I experimented with wire solder. I would take a piece and wrap it around the shaft in different places with some tape. It was amazing how these little changes completely changed the cue. You can really drive yourself crazy with this stuff.
 
Back
Top