JAM said:Yes, I know, by way of Canada.
I did not blame the European robots for the demise of American pool. Try not to take words out of context, Craig.
I did state, however, that their style of play on American television sets is boring, emotionless, and robotic. If they play here in America, they are, in essence, contributing to American pool when it is televised on American TV.
Let's get the story right. It was the WPA who approached "your" flamboyant American conman, DEMANDING a fee for the privilege of "your" flamboyant American conman to invest tens of millions of dollars in American pool. The WPA seems to show up on American soil if they can pocket some American dough.
Again, you are taking words out of context, and I hasten to say this thread is becoming a back-and-forth colloquy between your view and my view. Where, Craig, did I say a player cheating is more marketable than a player acting professionally?
And your point?
I have no fantasy that it is only Europeans and Asians. I singled them out because these European and Asian players have flocked to the United States in the droves, looking to pocket some American pool monies. The Korean ladies seemed to like American pool because, quite frankly, there was a time when Korea tournaments for women didn't pay very well.
Where in the world, Craig, have you gotten this cheating agenda? I don't recall mentioning pool players cheating.
Now you're fishing. I have NEVER, NEVER, NEVER, NEVER, NEVER, NEVER, NEVER condoned cheating. Yet, you now bring it up in this thread. WTF!
JAM
I agree, lets leave the Asians and Europeans out of it and get back on topic! But I would like to share this with you first if you don't mind.
Recently a young player from China called Ding has been making a big name for himself in the Snooker world. You would describe him as robotic I'm sure (and Earl would prob do a mocking dance

Truth be told Snooker has few characters like the old days as the game has become more and more cut throat the players have turned more and more professional, almost ruthless in their quest to succeed. Some comments from worldsnooker.com, the commercial body of the WPBSA:
"As the owner of the sport’s commercial rights, World Snooker also negotiates sponsorship for tournaments as well as television contracts. Snooker is one of the most popular sports in the United Kingdom and is played by over 4 million adults. It attracts vast television audiences; the 2005 World Championship final was watched by a peak figure of 7.8 million on the BBC. 45% of the UK population (25 million) watched 15 minutes or more of the coverage.
The sport’s popularity is also growing rapidly in many countries around the globe. In 2004, World Snooker signed a deal with Eurosport to beam snooker into 51 different territories, with a reach of 95 million homes across Europe, North Africa and the Middle East. Viewing figures are particularly high in countries such as Germany, Belgium and Holland.
In the Far East, the snooker boom is developing at pace. The China Open staged in Beijing in 2005 was enthusiastically received by Chinese fans. A stagering 110 million people watched live on television as Ding Junhui beat Stephen Hendry in the final to elevate himself to the status of national hero.
The WPBSA also deals specifically with the rules and regulations of snooker as well as disciplinary matters. The WPBSA board is chaired by Sir Rodney Walker and also includes Sir David Richards, Mike Dunn, Jim McMahon, Dr Hamish McInnes, Lee Doyle and Peter Ebdon. World Snooker’s headquarters is in Bristol. Click here for contact details.
It also has a commercial base in London:
14-16 Great Portland St
London
W1W 8QW
And an office in China:
World Snooker China (Beijing)
Representative Office Suite 1532
15 Floor
NCI Tower
12A Jianguomenwai Avenue
Chaoyang District
100022 Beijing
China
Tel 00 86 010 8523 3059
Fax 00 86 010 8523 3001"
I share this with you because of two reasons:
1) It proves that even emotionless professional "european/Asian robots" have mass appeal on TV.
2) World Snooker have realised this early and have already setup office in China, their only office outside the UK.
The very type of players you lambaste are no doubt currently saving Snooker, wouldn't it be ironic if they also save Pool?
