I just keep on fearing that people think this is what I and a few others in this thread are argumenting and it
just isn't, we pretty much all agree they cannot.
The discussion is, can Ronnie beat Shane in a long race of 8-Ball or can Shane beat Ronnie in a long race
of snooker. The chance of either happening is very slim at best, but it is still my belief that Shane will beat
Ronnie before Ronnie beats Shane.
I have given quite a few reasonable arguments as to why I think that and pretty much the only counter
arguments have been alon the lines of, you're crazy, Ronnie (pro snooker players in general) is god, snooker
is just way too tough for these silly american pool players and their bad technique.
Ronnie cannot break worth a damn and will not learn to do this any time soon because it is just damn
hard to break the balls really good. He might be able to pot any and every ball he sees but he will break
dry or scratch on the break so much more often then Shane it will be a walk in the park. Shane will
simply never lose a long race, it is just not going to happen. Jumping, massé, kicking balls in and all that
other stuff alone make it impossible for Ronnie to win, the break just makes it completely so.
These are not skills learned over a few weeks or months. Learning to pot balls and play decent safetys
in snooker if you allready shoot as straight as Shane does, is.
gr. Dave