Men have bigger sticks and more ballsThe difference in why men play better:
Men have bigger sticks and more ballsThe difference in why men play better:
except they wont because they'll be labeled bigots, cnn will smear them, sponsors will receive thousands of threatening phone calls, as will tournament venues, resulting in dropped financial support for the players, cancelled tournaments, and mobs will probably form infront of their houses to threaten them and their children. We've seen this play out....oh i dont know.....a thousand times.If the women do not want it, the only option I see is ALL the women boycotting a tournament. Then the pressure will be placed back on the promoters and tournament host.
But it's ok to be a coward. Got it.except they wont because they'll be labeled bigots, cnn will smear them, sponsors will receive thousands of threatening phone calls, as will tournament venues, resulting in dropped financial support for the players, cancelled tournaments, and mobs will probably form infront of their houses to threaten them and their children. We've seen this play out....oh i dont know.....a thousand times.
I heartily disagree…there’s only two genders…with rare exceptions.I dont get why it matters. Only thing I can think of is the generally average height advantage that men have over women. But we have a lot of pro male players that are short.
I am supporting of having a women's only division to get some equality and female specific recognition (Historically men have played a lot longer so there is generational influence and experience). A men's only division shouldn't even exist, it should just be an open division. Trans male to female should be able to participate in the women's only divisions.
Maybe women know better then to devote a huge portion of their life to a game that gives little in rewards? So maybe they are smarter then men.On the trans issues, I have my own opinions but no useful perspectives to share and personally don’t choose to engage in online debates on these types of things. The whole thing is a huge weird confusing mess. We’re clearly going to see this play out in all sports and aspects of society… SJM’s summary above covers it for me.
I do find the male dominance of our sport interesting. I quit being a pool bum for 25 years until getting back into the game in early Covid lockdowns. I essentially replaced pool in my life with scuba diving. Technical/cave diving is an even more testosterone/ego driven sport than pool. I’ve also dabbled with competitive shooting, and aggressive snow skiing. All of which have similar issues. In both diving & shooting what I’ve observed is that while there are very few females relative to males at the higher levels, the ones that do get super into it tend to be excellent. These activities tend to require a fair amount of aggression & courage to pursue and like pool, have a huge mental component.
Diving is the area I’m most experienced with - generally females that do break through & excel are much more natural & fluid in the water, are much calmer under stress and generally make much higher quality, reliable buddies. Also, they tend to be much more organized, detail oriented, better students, and give & take feedback much better.
So its curious to me why we don’t see more females active & excelling in pool, since many of these these qualities are key characteristics in billiards. There are clearly tasks that each gender has stronger & weaker elements, but in pool I suspect the basic aggression component of teststerone creates a barrier to initial entry in the typical bar/poolhall env and male dominated cultural/historical nature of the sport has just put females behind the curve. Personally I’m not so sure about the hand-eye coordination aspects - this may appear to be the case, but generational dominance of males in such activities may mask some of these issues. Ladies fast pitch softball pitchers are nothing short of amazing and there are certainly many many super high level lady action & bullseye shooters that don’t have significantly lower scores/times than top level males.
I totally understand the justification for having separate male/female divisions in pool, especially in terms of top women being practically disadvantaged in top rankings vs men - but it also seems to me that more intermingling and exposure may level that out over time. And it would be more fun & enrichen the sport overall for all of us IMO.
Just some thoughts. Complex stuff & I have no good solutions. One thing for sure, ladies sure do smell better!
![]()
Maybe?Na
Maybe women know better then to devote a huge portion of their life to a game that gives little in rewards? So maybe they are smarter then men.
Yes, absolutely!Na
Maybe women know better then to devote a huge portion of their life to a game that gives little in rewards? So maybe they are smarter then men.
And then came the lib-turd to make it political.The author sounds like the usual transphobic gibberish that we have on this side of the pond (in the Red states).
First, I like your avatar. I have an 8 yr blue weim that looks just like yours!The author sounds like the usual transphobic gibberish that we have on this side of the pond (in the Red states).
that’s been an argument for why men are so much better than women in chessNa
Maybe women know better then to devote a huge portion of their life to a game that gives little in rewards? So maybe they are smarter then men.