Looks like Big Ko is going to lose to a woman old enough to be his mother, and a man old enough to be his father. :grin-square:
These guys are both shooting way over .900 TPA atm, this is the strongest showing by two opponents we have seen yet on the TV table. Very strong play.
Earl would agree!These break rules are ridiculous. What next, they turn the rack upside down and you have to hit into the 1-ball off the end rail? Maybe force the players to break while standing on one leg?
Why is everyone so scared to just let the players play nine ball the normal way?
Was wondering the same thing???So in one match we're calling shot clock fouls on players, but the next match not using the clock at all?
In the 90s, I used to say thet the US Open was tougher to win than the world championship...
....it might still be
I would say this is the first year where it is close since back when the USA was the premier pool playing country by far (back in the 1980's)
I still think the World 9-ball championships has a slightly tougher field. This US Open is extremely tough and a field like the event has not ever seen but it is missing a few of the elite players still.
Wu Chia Ching
Johann Chua
Aloysius Yapp
Lee Van Corteza
Waleed Majid
and quite a few other top players from overseas.
This US Open managed to draw a strong field of international competitors, but the World 9-Ball Championships tend to get every one of the top performing pool players who are currently active. This US Open did get a couple people the World 9-ball Championships did not get such as Alex Pagulayan, Bergman, and some others who don't travel much to the major international events, but those guys are not even replacements for the guys on the above list.
WPC tougher than this US Open? I dont think so. Here's why: At the WPC, there is a contingent of players who get appointed in their countries to take part. From the best pool countries like Taiwan, China, Philippines are not as many at the WPC compared to the US Open. Paying one grand entry fee speaks for itself too.
Hmmmm, let's see, Big Ko wins World 9 ball championship but gets dumped just past halfway into the Open.
Niels Feijen won World 9 ball last year yet at last years US Open was seen mumbling to himself over in a corner about Shane's break after Shane destroyed him.
It would appear your comment on which Field is tougher lacks substance. I mean both the aforementioned last 2 World Champs who navigated the "toughest Field" to win there can't win here. Draw your own conclusions.
That is a false argument. You can cherry pick players who did well in one and not in the other until you are blue in the face to try to prove a point for either side of the debate, and it will be just as meaningless for either side. Feijen won the 2014 World 9-ball Championships, I don't think he even made it out of his bracket in the 2015 World 9-ball Championships, but that is in truth a moot point anyhow, it means as little as the cherry picked results you posted above.
As I said in the above post. Look at the number of top ranked players in either field, look at the number of people in the top 25 who competed, the number of people in the top 30, the number of people in the top 40 who were in either event.
http://www.wpa-pool.com/web/rankings
That is the most simple and clear way of determining the strength of each field and comparing them.
There are people in the world whose world rankings make clear have the speed to win this US Open who are "not in" this US Open. I do not think there was anyone whose world ranking suggests had much of a chance to win the WPC World 9-ball Championships who was not actually "in" the World 9-ball Championships.