To the OP:
Your getting the 'bad cuemaker' to give you back your $500 the way you did does not bother me, at all.
But after getting your money back and not following through to warn people about this 'bad cuemaker', that does bother me.
The $500 was supposed to represent making your deal right.
Not 'be-quiet' money (even if that's what the 'bad cuemaker' thought).
You are *always* supposed to be able to openly discuss how people have treated you in a deal, good or bad.
Getting your money back should not change that.
You are now calling your own character into question.
best,
brian kc
No,the threat was because I wanted to make you happy and calm at the same time and to produce myself some extra expenses.
Please,when you will have time,please send me capacious thesis abou all your bad experiences so I could keep eye on.
However,if you are looking for that kind of experience just send me your cues and I'll send them to that guy.Feel free to try.
![]()
Beside all that,you could see from the start of the treat that the story is what will be published but not the name of the cuemaker.But,as you know from James Bond movies Curiosity kills
No,the threat was because I wanted to make you happy and calm at the same time and to produce myself some extra expenses.
Please,when you will have time,please send me capacious thesis about all your bad experiences so I could keep eye on.
However,if you are looking for that kind of experience just send me your cues and I'll send them to that guy.Feel free to try.
![]()
does he rub the grip between his ass cheeks or something?