Video - John Schmidt vs Quinten Hann

Scaramouche said:
LOL, that is awesome. What a way to prove your point from the other thread. That first safety was maybe the worst I have ever seen from a "Pro". I am a fairley good snooker player or at least I was but not in the same class as Ronnie or any other pro snooker player obviously. However I believe I could have played a much better safety shot there.
 
burns420 said:
what point was proven? because ronnie beat hann it means schmidt will?
To me it shows that against a good apponents Quentin will consistently leave east century breaks. That usually means game over. Lets say John in snooker practice is opening the balls up a bit and making high breaks he will get all the chances he wants. I believe Quentin is a decent player but there are alot of those around and sometime some of them get lucky and make it to TV time. At the end of the day John already has said he would not be ready to take on the Crucible, That is true I admire John and as the words say "Man know thy self" John seems to know where he stands but I guess Quentin has no idea, he believes he is a world beater. Good for him I guess you have to have confidence however as someone already pointed out If you talk big you better be able to come through.
 
the last part is true but i dont see how quentin consistently leaves easy chances for breaks. ronnie and others can consistently run high numbers no matter who they play.
 
burns420 said:
What point was proven?

bfdlad said:
To me it shows that against a good apponents Quentin will consistently leave east century breaks......

One mistake in one frame followed by possibly the most gifted player in snooker history making a maximum beak "PROVES" that Hann will consistently leave easy century breaks?:eek: :rolleyes: :eek:

You're not considering a career as a Supreme Court judge by any chance?:) :p
 
Back
Top