What Do You Hate To See In A Cue?

iconcue said:
it was pretty short and to the point! surely you understood it.

Thank you for not addressing any of my points. Good luck "upgrading" those pic files, you're not cut out for debate between adults.

-Roger
 
buddha162 said:
Thank you for not addressing any of my points. Good luck "upgrading" those pic files, you're not cut out for debate between adults.

-Roger
a debate? what are we debating? what points did you make?
you're obviously just trying to be a dick! :)
 
iconcue said:
a debate? what are we debating? what points did you make?
you're obviously just trying to be a dick! :)

Alright.

First of all, I mentioned Barry's atrocious inlays in a response to Jimbo, in the context of execution in general. I don't think it's fair that someone who does such a bad job deserves a 7 year waitlist and to charge that much for his cues, but that's just my opinion, of course.

Your only involvement is the fact that you took great pictures (bravo again) of your cues, and I happened to see those glueline/gaps and crooked windows on your site. You then said something about "imaging technology" making every cue look bad, and pulled those pictures from your site!

So here are my questions again: What exactly are you saying? That those gluelines were not there? That somehow, through the magic of "imaging technology," they appeared out of nowhere in your photographs of the cue?

You've answered none of them. If you choose to dodge, that's fine, but don't expect anyone to take your one-liners seriously.

-Roger
 
buddha162 said:
Alright.

First of all, I mentioned Barry's atrocious inlays in a response to Jimbo, in the context of execution in general. I don't think it's fair that someone who does such a bad job deserves a 7 year waitlist and to charge that much for his cues, but that's just my opinion, of course.

Your only involvement is the fact that you took great pictures (bravo again) of your cues, and I happened to see those glueline/gaps and crooked windows on your site. You then said something about "imaging technology" making every cue look bad, and pulled those pictures from your site!

So here are my questions again: What exactly are you saying? That those gluelines were not there? That somehow, through the magic of "imaging technology," they appeared out of nowhere in your photographs of the cue?

You've answered none of them. If you choose to dodge, that's fine, but don't expect anyone to take your one-liners seriously.

-Roger
you've yet to even state which cue you are referring to.
digital imaging technology can show mistakes that cannot be seen with the naked eye. if you cannot see a mistake with the naked eye what does it matter? i'm sure my camera could find more than you did with your loop.

but your obvious intent is to damage a cue makers reputation. and for what reason? you probably don't even have one.

if you don't like the way someone makes a cue don't buy it from them. if you have personal problems with barry give him a call. i'm sure he'll be more than happy to talk to you.

if you don't like my collection don't look at it! i don't owe you an explanation about anything.

jeff
 
cueaddicts said:
This brings me to an interesting point I'd like to interject. For the most part, what you are often seeing as glue lines a poor workmanship is probably more likely the limits of the lacquer finish Barry is using. It's 2005 and there are several great automotive finishes out there. Even if a cue is unused, over time lacquer will tend to yellow and move/peel.

This is very good information. Too bad we couldn't get to the bottom of this either way since those photos are being "upgraded."

I had no idea he used a lacquer finish and that would indeed explain alot. Then again, it could just be shitty inlays! Btw, the crooked windows cannot be explained by the kind of finish he uses, and when I say crooked I mean crooked.

Thanks for the insight,
Roger
 
iconcue said:
you've yet to even state which cue you are referring to.
digital imaging technology can show mistakes that cannot be seen with the naked eye. if you cannot see a mistake with the naked eye what does it matter? i'm sure my camera could find more than you did with your loop.

Those gaps and that one crooked window are not microscopic, lol. Unless your cue is a miniature model, I can garuantee anyone could see those imperfections. They are blatantly obvious.

but your obvious intent is to damage a cue makers reputation. and for what reason? you probably don't even have one.

if you don't like the way someone makes a cue don't buy it from them. if you have personal problems with barry give him a call. i'm sure he'll be more than happy to talk to you.

if you don't like my collection don't look at it! i don't owe you an explanation about anything.

jeff

This was never personal. If a cuemaker lets a cue leave his shop in that condition, he deserves to be called on it, especially someone as highly regarded as Barry S. I've readily pointed out the shoddy work Richard Black pumps out of his shop, and maybe he'll take it the wrong way and maybe someone who collects his cues will as well, but that's his fault for making them that way and the buyer's fault for buying them!

Roger
 
NO Class

[/I]
buddha162 said:
I went back to your website and under BS it says..."taking better pics" LMFAO! Are you photoshopping those pics?!?

Your photos are great, they show intricate detail and in this case, shoddy-ass inlay work. There are plenty of cues on your site, and I didn't see anything wrong with the rest of them. Your pictures are a true representation of his work, unless you photoshopped in the gluelines and the crooked windows!

Roger,
I don't participate here often, and I would like to explain why.............
You are a prime example....

People who come on here thinking they know everything about cue making... I would LOVE to know what makes you an expert.... How big is your collection? How many cues have you made? Are you a Dealer? .... We know you love Skip Weston cues since you live in NJ...

I've seen glue lines from every cue maker... But I don't come on this forum and make a personal attack..... I've never heard of you... You must be Very well known in this industry badmouthing a cue maker in this forum...

When I read the disrespectful comments you've made on this public forum it makes me sick.... Your REPEATED insults of Barry Szamboti are offending. How many times are you going to say "atrocious" also WHO are you to ever say "shoddy-ass inlay work". You obviously have an agenda.... We all wonder who you buy cues from???

Barry Szamboti is one of the most respected cue makers in the industry... I guess everyone who is on the 7 year wait, and spends thousands doesn't know much according to you...
Skip is a good cue maker, but YOU aren't helping him out talking stupid...
Ken
www.highendcues.com
 
Last edited:
HighEndCues said:
Roger,
I don't participate here often, and I would like to explain why.............
You are a prime example....

People who come on here thinking they know everything about cue making... I would LOVE to know what makes you an expert.... How big is your collection? How many cues have you made? Are you a Dealer? .... We know you love Skip Weston cues since you live in NJ...

I've seen glue lines from every cue maker... But I don't come on this forum and make a personal attack..... I've never heard of you... You must be Very well known in this industry badmouthing a cue maker in this forum...

So what you're saying is that I need some archaic set of qualifications to point out that a certain cue sports crooked windows and blurry inlays? Have you seen the pictures on iconcue's website? I don't need to know anything about cuemaking to know that gluegaps and uneven veneers = shoddy work. I suppose I should wait until I'm "very well known in this industry" to voice my observations, because being a person who can see obviously isn't good enough.

I'm beginning to understand Jimbo's frustrations more and more. I have no agenda here, I'm not trying to sell anything, nor am I trying to bump up the value of my collection.

Are you defending the two cues in question, or are you simply saying that because of Barry Szamboti's reputation, I should keep silent? Sean gave meaningful explanations as to why those inlays might appear the way they do. Even Iconcue's comment about the possibility that it's an early cue is a valid point. But your post is just asinine.

-Roger
 
Last edited:
buddha162 said:
This is very good information. Too bad we couldn't get to the bottom of this either way since those photos are being "upgraded."

I had no idea he used a lacquer finish and that would indeed explain alot. Then again, it could just be shitty inlays! Btw, the crooked windows cannot be explained by the kind of finish he uses, and when I say crooked I mean crooked.

Thanks for the insight,
Roger

i'm only reacting to what you're saying,,,,,,but glue lines and crooked windows puts any cuemaker in the ray schuler hall of fame. crooked windows is heresy, as it along with your basic ring is the simplest of all butt elements to do correctly....but ray managed to pull this off quite well
 
buddha162 said:
So what you're saying is that I need some archaic set of qualifications to point out that a certain cue sports crooked windows and blurry inlays? Have you seen the pictures on iconcue's website? I don't need to know anything about cuemaking to know that gluegaps and uneven veneers = shoddy work. I suppose I should wait until I'm "very well known in this industry" to voice my observations, because being a person who can see obviously isn't good enough.

Roger,
Maybe you just overlooked the one point.... Everyone has made gluelines at any giving time on a cue for many different reasons.....
So you are going to repeatly say to Bill Stroud, Ernie Gutierrez, Joel Hercek, Mottey and others....
HEY I'm ROGER.... "All of you are doing shotty ass work".... Does that sound any stupider then what you've been doing...

If this is the first cue that you've seen with gluelines, then you better stay quite... Your showing your lack of experience and knowledge...
You find one thing now you think your an expert.... YEAH ROGER....
Real classy to keep bad mouthing a super cuemaker...
 
HighEndCues said:
[/I][
Roger,
I don't participate here often, and I would like to explain why.............
You are a prime example....

People who come on here thinking they know everything about cue making... I would LOVE to know what makes you an expert.... How big is your collection? How many cues have you made? Are you a Dealer? .... We know you love Skip Weston cues since you live in NJ...



www.highendcues.com

if buddha sees glue lines etc,,,and they are in fact what he says, he is commenting on the cosmetic faux pas of a cue, they are what they are. he is NOT commenting on cue construction. anyone with a discerning pair of eyes is eminently qualified to make judgemental statements on work that is clearly visible.
 
bruin70 said:
if buddha sees glue lines etc,,,and they are in fact what he says, he is commenting on the cosmetic faux pas of a cue, they are what they are. he is NOT commenting on cue construction. anyone with a discerning pair of eyes is eminently qualified to make judgemental statements on work that is clearly visible.
how do you know he's not blind?
 
bruin70 said:
if buddha sees glue lines etc,,,and they are in fact what he says, he is commenting on the cosmetic faux pas of a cue, they are what they are. he is NOT commenting on cue construction. anyone with a discerning pair of eyes is eminently qualified to make judgemental statements on work that is clearly visible.

It's getting old.... He has a hair in his ass for Barry.... I can post pictures from most cuemakers with some kind of flaws...
Then we'll let Roger say everyone sucks....and we should never buy cues again from anyone...
What pictures show all this ........
 
Last edited:
HighEndCues said:
[
Roger,
Maybe you just overlooked the one point.... Everyone has made gluelines at any giving time on a cue for many different reasons.....
So you are going to repeatly say to Bill Stroud, Ernie Gutierrez, Joel Hercek, Mottey and others....
...

if they charge the big bucks, they set themselves to a higher standard. it is the reputation they have built for themselves. it's not a matter "everyones done it",,,it is a matter of whether buddha deems such a cue to be worthy of the asking price.
i do think however, that buddha's throwing out blanket statements that should only be reserved for cuemakers who have perfected the art of crap,,,,,,,like schuler.
 
iconcue said:
no bru! it's a matter of the guy being a dick for no reason!
Exactly Jeff.......
How about spending a couple dollers on cues yourself (ROGER).... Own a Skip Weston and your an expert on values and craftmanship.... I've had Many B Szamboti's and I have no idea what the hell this guy is talking about.... What pictures is he looking at???
Thats Jeff's cues your badmouthing......
 
Last edited:
I'm assuming that the B.S. cue in question is not the one with propeller's.
That is one of the prettiest cues I have ever seen.
 
Anyways I think what has to be mentioned is Barry is still doing all his stuff by hand. Its not fair to compare Barry to guys who use cnc and have more accuracy than his own cuemaking process allows. Gus' cues also show small amounts of hand fitting, doesn't mean they aren't worth the money.

This is one of the arguements in the cnc / hand made debate. Perfection vs flaws.... what is acceptable.

If you find flaws in CNC cues, then gripe, because now a cuemaker has the technology, if he cannot use it, thats his problem.

Joe
 
Last edited:
JimBo said:
The movie came out 20 years ago and the cue had to be from a time period 20 years prior to that (at least) So we need to remember what cues were popular playing cues of that time, the list is small to say the least.

Jim

Egg fukin zaktly.
 
Back
Top