Jeremy, I agree.
An easy way to look at it is this. See if you agree.
"B" level players do well in local nightly tournaments. Favored to get in the money. Will almost always finish below A players and above in these. They win local nightly tournaments more because opponents give them one too many chances, rather than because they forcibly win.
"A" players do well in smaller geographic area tournaments, like perhaps medium population cities/counties. Think "local two day weekend bar tournaments". Still, not any one A player is favored to win the tourney. In local nightly tournaments of the $70-$120, usually dominates. May be forced to sit out for weeks if he/she wins too often.
"Shortstop" players win local nightly tournaments at will, unless they are races to 1.

Favored to win local two day weekend tourneys every time they step in the box. They do well in smaller regional (multiple county) tournaments. Are capable of beating regional pros if they catch a stroke, but still big dogs to Champions.
"Regional Pros". Consistent winners at all local levels. At smaller regional tournaments, they also dominate, rarely losing a tournament, and when they do, it is to another regional pro. Think "Donny Mills" in Florida. HillBilly Bryant. Glenn Atwell in WA. These guys put a beating on some champions in the tournaments as well. Could be a champion if they had the time to practice as much as Deuel, Archer, etc.. At this level, only about 5 or 6 people have a realistic chance of winning big regional events. It's always the same people winning.
"Champions". Archer, Deuel, Reyes, Alcano, etc. These guys destroy anyone who does not regularly compete in the pro events. The only reason regional pros might have a better win percentage against them locally, is because the regional pros do not travel, and are very accustomed to local playing conditions. Regional pros want no part of gambling with champions.
What do you think?
Russ