vapoolplayer said:
i think i heard allen hopkins suggest this, and i agree:
you shouldn't be allowed to use a jump cue if you snooker yourself. but if your opponent snookers you, you can.
i tend to agree, because i've seen people(done it myself) leave a jump shot on a runout or push out to a jump shot. i don't think that should be allowed. although, as long as it is, if i see a shot that i would have some trouble getting shap on and i can get a fairly easy jump shot shape easier, i will.
VAP
Allen makes a great point, because:
NOTHING IN POOL IS MORE SACRED THAN POSITION PLAY
The jump cues of today have reduced the penalty for poor position play, and that's really a shame, devaluing this great game because of it, not to mention making comparison of today's players with the old masters more difficult, maybe even impossible.
Another big problem I have with jump cues is that the great game of pool has never been one of situational equipment (with the obvious and logical exception of the break cue, which, by causing the tip of one's main playing cue to last longer, probably reduces the cost of playing pool over the long haul.)
I play with a 12mm tip, a shaft that isn't stiff, and a long ferrule. When a long, straight shot comes up, I might prefer to switch to a cue with a 13 1/2mm tip. When a masse comes up, I might prefer to switch to a cue with a shorter ferrule. And on some shots, it would be nice to be able to switch to a cue with a stiffer shaft. I'm not allowed to make these equipment changes, however, as pool has always required that I master all the shots with one cue. It's a rule that not only makes the game more compelling and challenging, but ensures that the cost of playing doesn't get out of control, increasing the likelihood that pool will remain accessible to people at all income levels.
With apologies to those who enjoy jump shots and to those who make money by selling them, for me personally, I'd rather miss every kick for the remainder of my life than ever buy a jump cue.