If the rack contact was even more solid the CB wouldn’t jump as high.Of these ten great breaks, the two best definitely had a lot of height on the resulting hop. Obviously because he hit it harder with solid rack contact.
pj
chgo
If the rack contact was even more solid the CB wouldn’t jump as high.Of these ten great breaks, the two best definitely had a lot of height on the resulting hop. Obviously because he hit it harder with solid rack contact.
This guy gets it.Pop is just like "pop" you know, just give it a pop!
lol. For real man… don’t talk about and over analyze it…Just pop the damn thing!!!This guy gets it.
I think Sigel was just talking about a punch shot with some hit to it so that the cue ball can get to the rail and back out before any topspin takes it forward along the rail.
As for the break hop... There was a great slowmo break in a recent chanpionship on a matchroom production where they marvelled at how the breaker hit the cueball which left the table surface and returned perfectly with as square a contact on the 1 as you could ever hope for. It hopped a bit. Not something you need to try for. It will just happen at speed with a solid hit as the CB is never coming in perfectly along the cloth but is hopping its way to the rack as burn marks show us. Square hits at speed with that little bit of CB hopping will result in a hop more often than not. I don't think you have to try to do anything other than hit fast and square to make it hop.
But Sigel's 'pop' has nothing to do with the 3 pages of break convo. Just a 'pop'. like, you know, just give it a pop!![]()
A little further away from the cue tip?Yes, but (as pt109 said above) it bounces back even without the hop - actually farther back, and with greater control.
I think the hop on the break should be avoided - an easy way to get a square hit on the head ball without changing your stroke speed is to lower the butt (cue more level) and/or move the CB a little farther away.
pj
chgo
From the point on the rail the cue is coming from or from the bridge hand. Just to lower the cue's angle of descent and flatten it out. But really, you will never get pure flat and the CB will always have some level of hop to it. Whether dead square or just a tiny hop off is gonna be down a bit to luck..... or I guess superhuman precision in terms of matching up speed and cue elevation to get a perfect contact.A little further away from the cue tip?
Right.From the point on the rail the cue is coming from or from the bridge hand. Just to lower the cue's angle of descent and flatten it out.
Yes, but don't try to make the CB hop (as was suggested at the beginning of this discussion) - instead try to keep the hop low to deliver maximum force into the rack. More hop doesn't add anything; it's a symptom of a non-square hit.But really, you will never get pure flat and the CB will always have some level of hop to it. Whether dead square or just a tiny hop off is gonna be down a bit to luck..... or I guess superhuman precision in terms of matching up speed and cue elevation to get a perfect contact.
Yes, assuming the CB hops back at the same angle it approached from. More hop = less full hit.The hop on the break is simply a symptom of a tight rack and a full hit.
Ye, I said about as much above. The goal is a fast square hit. A hop will often occur as the CB will get some amount of air under it after it is struck slightly downward and doesn't really get a chance to regain a roll along the surface of the table at high speeds.Yes, but don't try to make the CB hop (as was suggested at the beginning of this discussion) - instead try to keep the hop low to deliver maximum force into the rack. More hop doesn't add anything; it's a symptom of a non-square hit.
I imagine he was probably talking about a center ball-ish pop, or stun shot. Just a guess.yeah, but he was talking about a long shot along the rail with a bit of an angle where the CB is headed for the rail.
The "pop" was supposed come off the rail and go down towards the end rail
It's much easier to respond if you don't read the thread..... But Sigel's 'pop' has nothing to do with the 3 pages of break convo. Just a 'pop'. like, you know, just give it a pop!![]()
yeah, but he was talking about a long shot along the rail with a bit of an angle where the CB is headed for the rail.
The "pop" was supposed come off the rail and go down towards the end rail
I saw this last night and tried it for a few minutes. Guess what. A world class player is correct that different strokes give different cueball effect. The penny shows it. Maybe these guys know something.I think the older generation of players had a different vocabulary. Here's CJ Wiley in a brand new video talking about different strokes, including the pop stroke.
CJ built his game to win money in tough spots. He did that with regularity. He and his road co-horts did/do know a few things.I saw this last night and tried it for a few minutes. Guess what. A world class player is correct that different strokes give different cueball effect. The penny shows it. Maybe these guys know something.