I'd say your speed is entirely amazing.
![]()
Most likely pro level.
I'd say your speed is entirely amazing.
![]()
Most likely pro level.
I guess there's a bunch of us here at pro level and didn't even realize it.:dance::clapping:
Zphix,
Glad to see you are continually pursuing improvement. When I played you and saw you play at the AZ Chicago meeting, I would have called you a solid "C" player. Of course one night is a fairly small sample size, and a person could easily play a level up or down from there, but your stroke, pattern play, safety's, etc, also suggested that level. If you played a AA player as tight as you are saying, then I would think that you would have to be a solid B to A- player at the least. A "B" player can have a good night and hang with just about anyone over a short period, especially on a 7 footer, but anything under this would never have a chance, even at their best, to hang with a AA player over those sets, and even then, the "B" player would have to have a real good night. So, while a "B" player could make that happen, it would likely take an A- to A player or better to do what you are talking about. While you certainly showed potential this summer, that is a pretty big jump to make in that amount of time, making me think the person you played isn't quite at that level (there certainly aren't that many AA players out there). If you are convinced he is a AA, you think that he played at his normal AA speed, and you can play the way you did all the time, then I would stand by my rating stated above (A- to A) and applaud a gargantuan jump in speed in 6 months. Of course a 7 footer does change things a bit vs a 9 footer, but you still have to be able to run out with an open table, play good safeties, and kick at at least a B speed to ever hang with a AA player.
Hell Allen, Efren asked for a spot the last time we played :grin:. Does that mean I play "pro speed" too
?
Actually you probably are closer to the point. From the posts I've read over the years on AZ, there are more than enough pro level players to start a tour with just us.
Seeking individual speed is a question best answered on a pool table in competition. One on one or tournament.
Lyn
Zphix...First of all, I'm not knocking you. Last summer you were a beginner, according to your posts here, and according to what I devised from talking to your brother. Frequently taking a professional lesson leads to serious quick improvement for many (provided you follow the direction of the lesson). You declined that, in favor of just playing...which is one way to do it (improve), but most of the time a slow route for many players. You're very young, and did show a small bit of speed at the Chicago get-together (I wasn't there, but I've talked to some who were). There's no way that you've improved that much in such a short time. No doubt playing with better players will help accrue playing "knowledge", but most of the time, the player will not be able to "make it happen" on demand, under pressure, and especially in one try. Like others said, post a video of you beating the 9 ball ghost, and that will silence the naysayers. BTW, if you're as good as you think you are, win the college tournament in Feb. and go to the ACUI Regional tournament. Win that, and proceed to the national event. THEN you'll be a player.![]()
Scott Lee
http://poolknowledge.com
Mantis, I appreciate the assessment.
A question for everybody; How big a factor do you think hunger is in learning and hitting the learning curve? I absolutely thirst for pool and again, play 4+ hours every day always trying to improve. Does this mentality I have allow me to learn or progress faster? Just a thought.
Also, I found that after I solidified my fundamentals and pre-shot routine I was able to move around the table much better. Like, since getting serious about pool I've had the "idea" of how to get the ball to go where I wanted but I lacked the technical skill to get it there but now my fundamental and technical skill is much better.
I PROMISE I WILL TRY TO GET A VIDEO UP OF ME PLAYING!
I've been trying forever to get info on getting into ACUI pool. My campus doesn't partake in it and I've been trying to get information.
I'm not suggesting I'm an A level player, etc. I've got no idea what I'd gauge my speed at. Though, I am asking if it's possible that another reason for this is out there.
Does hunger and lots of table time shorten learning curve? Does my attitude towards learning a hobby/passion shorten the learning curve?
All I can say is that I've made significant improvements in my game for sure: that's all.
Sent from my X501_USA_Cricket using Tapatalk 2
Like I said, what shortens the learning curve is good instruction. ...........
Scott Lee
http://poolknowledge.com
Last night I, played a AA player. Good friend now. met him playing with other monsters.
First race was no spot, race to 10 in 8-ball. He beats me 10-8. Next race was 15 in 9-ball, he gave me 3 games and the 8. I beat him 15 to 11. Last set was a race to 10 in 9-ball, no spot, he beats me 10-9 on the hill.
Based on this, what do you think my relative speed is? All sets played on 7 foot Valleys.
Sent from my X501_USA_Cricket using Tapatalk 2
Two things. I'll give an example that might explain my view on my progress through pool, and second, I'll get up a video of me playing the ghost in 9-ball around January when school resumes. The tables on campus aren't the best to play the ghost on because of how they roll. If I was able to record it at KKs in Green Bay or Appleton that would be a different story.
Next, I'll use the image below to explain how I think I might have progressed in pool. Please refrain from criticizing the picture or example. I know that we're all pool purists and the picture is not to be taken literally, it's only an example.
So, even when I first started in the APA I had the idea of how to get from the 8-ball to the 9-ball along the path I outlined. However, due to poor or inconsistent fundamentals and an inconsistent stroke I couldn't hit the CB where I wanted to, didn't follow through on my stroke, and would often stroke out of line and miss my intended contact point. Other times I'd drop my shoulder on a power stroke, etc, etc. and because of that I had very inconsistent results on a table.
But, with the help of other players (ones who have taken lessons from Scott Lee, Gene Albrecht, Mark Wilson, etc.) I was able to fix my fundamentals so now my stroke and fundamentals allow me to hit the CB the way I intended.
Then, even when I could in the APA I didn't have CB control and would often overhit or underhit for position and then once out of line I almost could never get back in line.
But the fundamentals and stroke have been fixed, and my pre-shot routine almost ensures that I'm already fundamentally sound when I step down into my shot. So, I stroke straight and have better CB control not because I learned how to shoot for position differently but because I have fundamentals that match my cognitive plans I've improved.
What I'm trying to say is; could I have had the position, or cognitive thoughts of a B or A player, and the fundamentals of a C player? Would that have made me an APA 4, and would fixing those fundamentals account for me getting better so much faster?