Which Presidential Candidate Best For Pool

ShootingArts said:
No doubt in my mind, Hillary would be best for pool. With the country gone to hell in a handbasket what else would anyone have to do but hang out at the pool halls? :D ;) :D

Hu


I mean, she's married to Bill so you know there's a bit of delinquint in her. I say that's an easy call.
 
jay helfert said:
I think Obama is what we need right now in this country, after eight years of total garbage leadership! JMHO of course.

Jay would you care to elaborate some? What will be Obama's strengths, qualities, etc.
He's a great speaker with tons of charisma but his voting record doesn't bode well. What is it that you find appealing about him? Philw
 
Flex said:
http://www.humanevents.com/article.php?id=24354

"Barack Obama is the most pro-abortion presidential candidate ever. He is so pro-abortion he refused as an Illinois state senator to support legislation to protect babies who survived late-term abortions because he did not want to concede -- as he explained in a cold-blooded speech on the Illinois Senate floor -- that these babies, fully outside their mothers' wombs, with their hearts beating and lungs heaving, were in fact "persons.""


Jay, is that the kind of "leadership" of which you speak?
Please lets not be swayed by the facts.
 
jay helfert said:
Thanks for this well reasoned post. You got me at the end though, when you said he was "scary" because he was a good speaker. Why does that make him scary? Better we should have another nincompoop like GW who can barely put two coherent sentences together.
Jay, I'm just curious who do you hate more GW or Kevin Trudeau?
 
jay helfert said:
I'd like to have a dollar for every word he mispronounced and every word he used incorrectly. And he used the same trite lines to describe his foreign policy and military strategies over and over. "Bring 'em on" is one gem that comes to mind. He had sound bites for speeches. Let's face it, we have a fool for a President.

And I would tell him the same thing to his face if I ever met him. "You sir are a FOOL!" And a dangerous one at that. Not you Flex, him.
Jay, George Bush is a gentleman and has nothing but class so when you called him a fool to his face he would probably say "I,m sorry you feel that way" but then again who knows he might deck ya! CowboyUP Jay!
 
ShootingArts said:
No doubt in my mind, Hillary would be best for pool. With the country gone to hell in a handbasket what else would anyone have to do but hang out at the pool halls? :D ;) :D

Hu
My thoughts too! I'm sure Bill would find plenty of reasons to get out of the house. Philw
 
philw said:
Jay would you care to elaborate some? What will be Obama's strengths, qualities, etc.
He's a great speaker with tons of charisma but his voting record doesn't bode well. What is it that you find appealing about him? Philw

You got to the party late. You'll have to go back a few pages and find out.
 
philw said:
Jay, I'm just curious who do you hate more GW or Kevin Trudeau?

I don't hate anyone. That's not healthy. I do dislike both of these men. GWB more because his incompetence affects us all so profoundly.
 
philw said:
Jay, George Bush is a gentleman and has nothing but class so when you called him a fool to his face he would probably say "I,m sorry you feel that way" but then again who knows he might deck ya! CowboyUP Jay!

He's a liar and a cheat. And that's only the tip of the iceberg. What rock have you been hiding under?

Cowboy my ass. From what I see, I think he's a puss. I bet he got his ass whipped a few times when he was a young'un. He comes off like a smart ass to me. A know it all, who actually doesn't have a clue. He's been a puppet throughout his Presidency.
 
Flex said:
Jay, I knew that dropping JFK into the discussion would push your buttons; I like you too.

One thing that 43 has on the other fellow (note I didn't put his name in the same sentence or breath :p ) is that he is no adulterer, as far as I know... and for me, that means a lot.

No, he was just an alcoholic and cocaine user who was able to bankrupt a couple businesses. Thats much better to have.
 
Flex said:
Jay, I knew that dropping JFK into the discussion would push your buttons; I like you too.

One thing that 43 has on the other fellow (note I didn't put his name in the same sentence or breath :p ) is that he is no adulterer, as far as I know... and for me, that means a lot.

Wanna know why. What girl in her right mind would have him? He got the only one that would.
 
Ron Paul is the best candidate in the election. He won't get elected because our country is full of idiots.

And what's all this talk about electing a woman? Did our country all the sudden run out of men? I'm a man... that automatically makes me more qualified than Hillary. :D
 
Last edited:
jay helfert said:
Thanks for this well reasoned post. You got me at the end though, when you said he was "scary" because he was a good speaker. Why does that make him scary? Better we should have another nincompoop like GW who can barely put two coherent sentences together.


The last statement is just ridiculous Jay. The man has more education and more money through successful business dealings than Fatboy, KT, you, and I combined. It's like saying someone can't shoot pool just because you don't like them.
 
jay helfert said:
Just so we all can be on the same page, here for your perusal is the Second Amendment.

"A well regulated militia, being necessary to the security of a free state, the right of the people to keep and bear arms, shall not be infringed."

So this little verse has been the subject of interpretation for many decades now. What do you think it means? I think it means an armed and organized force of individuals who are trained to provide security for all. I don't think this means every individual is a "militia" of one. And I don't think it means individual citizens should have guns to protect themselves against the militia, or "keep it in check". That makes no sense. The individuals are the ones who make up the militia.


Once again, if you do not read the REST of the constitution, and only the second amendment as you have, then you won't understand WHAT it amends!!! Obviously you haven't read the REST of the constitution!

I feel like I'm talking to a wall.:eek:
 
jay helfert said:
He's a liar and a cheat. And that's only the tip of the iceberg. What rock have you been hiding under?

Cowboy my ass. From what I see, I think he's a puss. I bet he got his ass whipped a few times when he was a young'un. He comes off like a smart ass to me. A know it all, who actually doesn't have a clue. He's been a puppet throughout his Presidency.

He's a new kind of cowboy.............. A New Enlgand Prep School, Skull and Bones, Yale, and Harvard Cowboy. I think he learned all his cowboy ways summering in Kennebuckport.
He is as much a cowboy as John Kerry.
 
DeadPoked said:
Ron Paul is the best candidate in the election. He won't get elected because our country is full of idiots.

And what's all this talk about electing a woman? Did our country all the sudden run out of men? I'm a man... that automatically makes me more qualified than Hillary. :D

I totally agree with you about Ron Paul, and about this country being full of idiots!
 
Jude Rosenstock said:
Flex, you know I was joking but seriously, I don't think I'd feel terribly safe if I knew someone on the subway could have a gun. I know some people that do and thankfully all of these people are very responsible but no, I can't agree with absolute freedom. There is a middle ground I'm okay with but only because I know the average person isn't going to get their hands on one.

Thanks, Jude. I honestly wasn't sure if you knew about the current state of the laws in my old home state of New York. Actually, I wasn't sure just how restrictive the laws were there these days, and thus did a few minutes of research to find out.

Very few people believe in "absolute freedom" in regards to guns, as it is illegal throughout the US for felons to possess guns, for instance.

As for the NY subway, a good many years ago a friend mistakenly got off at the wrong station, and when he realized it, the train had already left. His back was to the tracks, and about ten thugs slowly started to encircle him. He's a rugged looking fellow, about average height and build, with a rather metallic voice. His face looks like he's been through a few fights. He slipped his hand into his jacket and left it there, and stared the thugs down, and said coldly, "Don't try anything..." and calmly walked through them. They parted to let him through and thankfully nothing happened. BTW, he doesn't own a gun, and also didn't have one with him...

Flex
 
beav99_4life said:
No, he was just an alcoholic and cocaine user who was able to bankrupt a couple businesses. Thats much better to have.

My, what a comeback he's had...
 
jay helfert said:
Wanna know why. What girl in her right mind would have him? He got the only one that would.

He's a married man, who as far as I know is faithful to his wife. How can you possibly hope to know what really goes on or went on in women's minds? Plus, oftentimes, they aren't exactly transparent when it comes to telling others what they think :D
 
Back
Top