In your opinions, which table would buy, if all the variables price, condition, cloth, every thing else is the same, would you buy a Brunswick Gold Crown or a Brunswick Centinnial. Thanks for the input.
n10spool said:Industry standard ...hmmmm
would that be the most copied { probably Brunswick }
Snooker 6x12 id say is Riley { not diamond }
5x10 a hand full of makers including brunswick { not diamond }
convertable rails from pocket to billiards a few { not diamond }
able to dissasemble and carry up 5 flights of stairs by hand {not diamond }
the list goes on and on...
Now he have a new comer with a frame and rails that are stiffer then the classic brunswick [gold crown]. The diamond banks true from less flex in the rails and frame ie less movement better accuracy. Diamond should be the bmw of tables of today. Both tables are great i love them both equaly..
But for industry standard would have to go to the chineese\taiwaneese tables 900 table manufactures building the same table over and over for $350 wholesale$1000 retail and i install around 10 week versus 1-2 brunswick and diamonds a month @$2000 to $6000 retail.
I dont sell imports i just install and repair them.
Just a can worms partialy opened for the next set of comments.
I see more Brunswicks, Olhausens and Connelys in pro events.Russ Chewning said:Well, yah.. When you talk about how many tables are on the market, you're probably right..I meant industry standard as in the 9 foot tables the pros play on, and the one you need if you want to compete against the pros.. I know they compete on other tables, but it seems most majors are played on Diamonds, and if you run out on a Diamond, you throw your stick at the balls and they go in on other tables...
Russ