Ive seen many threads concerning this and many conversations about this so top players at what 9ball,1 pocket,14.1?Do you mean all around?If so then all around in no particular order here would be my choices.
Lassiter
Varner
Efren
Sigel
Mizerack
Don Willis
Harold Worst
Luther Lassiter
Buddy Hall
Efren Reyes
In no particular order
What about Minnesota Fats?
It depends on the game. The old timers like Mosconi played a completely different game than what is played now and possessed a different skill set.
Not that they wouldn't be competitive playing today's players, but I am quite certain Orcullo would be a solid favorite over a prime Mosconi at 10 ball for at least a half a year until Mosconi learns the break and develops a strong 10 ball kick safety game.
Even once Mosconi gets used to the game, its difficult to say whether or not he would ever become more than a coin flip over Orcullo because rotation games are what Orcullo has specialized in since he could see over the rail. Once you figure in guys like Reyes, Parica, Strickland, and Buddy in their primes, you can't really include him in the top 5 if you think in terms of 9/10 ball.
Of course the scenario is flipped when it comes to straight pool. I doubt you could include anyone living in the top 5 in terms of straight pool just because nobody really grows up competing at straight pool these days. Certainly, there are a few high ball runners out there today, but I believe a lot of the knowledge of reading racks and picking out balls and playing safeties has been lost over the years.
Top 5 in 14.1 would be a hard nut to crack.... but Danny D. saw and competed with many who would be on that list and he stated that Thorsten "might" be the best 14.1 player ever.......
I still love Danny's quote " I'm a straight pool player.... but I miss now so I play one-pocket"
It depends on the game. The old timers like Mosconi played a completely different game than what is played now and possessed a different skill set.
Not that they wouldn't be competitive playing today's players, but I am quite certain Orcullo would be a solid favorite over a prime Mosconi at 10 ball for at least a half a year until Mosconi learns the break and develops a strong 10 ball kick safety game.
Even once Mosconi gets used to the game, its difficult to say whether or not he would ever become more than a coin flip over Orcullo because rotation games are what Orcullo has specialized in since he could see over the rail. Once you figure in guys like Reyes, Parica, Strickland, and Buddy in their primes, you can't really include him in the top 5 if you think in terms of 9/10 ball.
Of course the scenario is flipped when it comes to straight pool. I doubt you could include anyone living in the top 5 in terms of straight pool just because nobody really grows up competing at straight pool these days. Certainly, there are a few high ball runners out there today, but I believe a lot of the knowledge of reading racks and picking out balls and playing safeties has been lost over the years.
Good post. Thanks.
Many Regards,
Lock N Load.
Yeah, LL, but that's part of the fun of these kinds of threads - picking the dominant players of the different eras and assessing how they would stack up against the players, games, and equipment played in other eras.
Anyome who doesn't think Mosconi would have been just as dominating if the game was 8 Ball or 10 Ball are probably fooling themselves (imho).
Same applies to the more modern players. If 14.1 suddenly became the main professional game again, likely most of today's top players would still wind up at the top. Sure there are some excellent players that maybe don't have quite the "head" required for straight pool or one hole, but the top elite players have both the physical skill to pocket balls and play position, and the brains/imagination/creativity required of one pocket and the pattern games.
What about Minnesota Fats?
Do you think Buddy Hall could play with these guys?
Many Regards,
Lock N Load.
Yeah, LL, but that's part of the fun of these kinds of threads - picking the dominant players of the different eras and assessing how they would stack up against the players, games, and equipment played in other eras.
Anyone who doesn't think Mosconi would have been just as dominating if the game was 8 Ball or 10 Ball are probably fooling themselves (imho).
Same applies to the more modern players. If 14.1 suddenly became the main professional game again, likely most of today's top players would still wind up at the top. Sure there are some excellent players that maybe don't have quite the "head" required for straight pool or one hole, but the top elite players have both the physical skill to pocket balls and play position, and the brains/imagination/creativity required of one pocket and the pattern games.
as mentioned before for all around my money is on harold worst
I see what you are saying, but if you want to compare players across different games, you might as well throw in Stephen Hendry, Ronnie o'sullivan, Tobjorn Blohmdahl, and Raymond Cuelemans because they would also dominate if they took up 10 ball seriously.
Also, I don't think Mosconi would win quite as often as he did back then just due to the somewhat lucky nature of 10 ball and the way tournaments now a days are set up.