Who is the greatest straight pool player alive?

ghost ball said:
IMO, straight pool is the only way pool players can gauge their game. Just think, if pool players had cards like baseball, their average run and high run can be on the back. This gives us a benchmark on how well aspiring pool players stack up against the top shooters.

Bring back straight pool.

ghost

The only problem with that is that there would have to be standardized playing conditions first. Same pockets, same cloth, same rails etc.
 
I think if Earl, Efren and Johnny would all practice straight pool for a few hours a day for a month before a 14.1 tournament like Earl mentioned, that they would leave the field in the dust. But who would win would be anybody's guess.
 
Straight Pool

I played a guy once in an exhibition match to 150 that was pretty good,

His name was Willie Mosconi, and I believe his 526 still stands as the best ever.
 
Earl Strickland said:
my high run was on just less than 5 inch pockets which is pretty big,I ran 408 balls on that table. I praticed on a 4 and 1/4 inch pocket 5 years of practicing on the same table,my high run was only 260 once.Most of the time I couldn't crack 100, usually 70 or 80 on that table.I believe with tighter pockets and high quality equipment will put a premium on running 70 or 80 or 100 balls.We have to make straight pool where its difficult to run a 100 balls like it is in English snooker.

In straight pool the side pockets are also a big issue. Some shots cannot be made at all in a 4 1/2 inch side that are hangers in a 5" side. Sometimes with the limited avialability of shots after a break out, this makes a big difference. Also the small sides will also just bounce a ball back at you from a steep angle.

Chris
 
Last edited:
Earl Strickland said:
We were just sitting around the pool room wondering who is the greatest straight pool player alive today,any thoughts?I believe you have to play a 250 point match on tight equipment,and play total offense,and there should also be a 30 second shot clock to keep pressure on the player.I think this would be exciting for people to watch.

I don't know who the best straight pool player is today, but I would venture to say that if it were to be played regularly today in big money tournaments, you would see a whole slew of super talented young players playing the best straight pool the world has ever seen. I would like to see the Taiwanese players take up the game. I think Fong Pang Chao would run balls for a week without missing on a table with 5" pockets.

Chris
 
cueman said:
I think if Earl, Efren and Johnny would all practice straight pool for a few hours a day for a month before a 14.1 tournament like Earl mentioned, that they would leave the field in the dust. But who would win would be anybody's guess.

I agree. Unless there is a straight pool championship we won't know for sure but I think that the best 9 ball players would still be the ones to beat.
 
MikeJanis said:
I kinda like Leil Gay (the Indian from Cleveland, OH)when it come to the dough.

Just my opinion, and to back it up I am willing to bet some beans on whatever straight pool game he matches up in.

Mj


He has run 100+ balls on the triple shimmed table at NFB on many occasions. in late 2003 him and I were supposed to play in NY straight pool tournament (cancelled due to lack of entrences) and I witnessed him run 80+ balls 3 times and 100+ balls run twice on a triple shimmed table (pockets were 4 1/8) and it was at a nice pace.
 
DDKoop said:
Nobody has mentioned Mike Zuglan and from what I hear his straight pool game far exceeds his 9 ball game.
I guess as far as todays players are concerned I would have to say my top 3 would be:
Engert
Hohmann
Schmidt


Good shot calling Zuglan Koop and no mention of Varner either, Jose Garcia is a great choice too. There is this French player named Stephan Cohen that has serious 14.1 game I would add to any list.
 
hustler said:
I agree. Unless there is a straight pool championship we won't know for sure but I think that the best 9 ball players would still be the ones to beat.

I would be more inclined to think the best 8 ball players would be the ones to beat.
 
I would have to say that there is enough difference in strategy and shot selection, that a proficiency in 9 ball or 8 ball alone wouldn't dictate who would come out on top. Just as it doesn't give us insight on who can or can't play one pocket. No matter what the game is, moving whitey is what it's all about.

While a nine-baller can re-locate the cueball well enough when he knows what ball is next, he may not have the foresight to plan out clusters and combos needed to build a competitive 14.1 game.
Note: in 9 ball you always know the order to play the rack.

Eight ball may use a bit more planning in this area, but it's still a far cry from 14.1.
Note: in 8 ball you may play a break out where you don't care where the other guy's ball ends up. In 14.1 they are all yours, and to leave a bad or difficult shot for your out ball can be a disaster when playing for position to break up the next rack.

A fine cueist in either game will still have to learn the thought process to be a threat.
Note: Efren (while he picked up on it rather quickly) had to learn one pocket even though he was already a phenom at rotation games.
 
reason

A real good 8 baller would have an advantage over a real good 9 baller,
because of tight manuvering of the cueball, clusters, breakout shots, etc. which are in common with straight pool.

and another reason why you have to consider Mike Sigel in with the best
14.1 players. He was a great 8 ball champion, and played very good 14.1
 
The only problem with that is that there would have to be standardized playing conditions first. Same pockets, same cloth, same rails etc.

If i am not mistaken, the BCA list standards for a pool table as well as a cue. If the table falls within those standards then what is there to dispute? If the standards need to be tighter, then so be it.

ghost
 
ghost ball said:
If i am not mistaken, the BCA list standards for a pool table as well as a cue. If the table falls within those standards then what is there to dispute? If the standards need to be tighter, then so be it.

ghost


BTW, it is an honor to be posting in a thread started by the Earl. Anyone who knows anything about pool would have to include Earl in their list of all time greats.

And, I would imagine, that if anyone could change the way the game is played, it would be Mr. Strickland. I think if he played strickly straight pool, the rest would follow and the demand for straight pool tournaments would increase. Champions are leaders.
 
Earl Strickland said:
my high run was on just less than 5 inch pockets which is pretty big,I ran 408 balls on that table. I praticed on a 4 and 1/4 inch pocket 5 years of practicing on the same table,my high run was only 260 once.Most of the time I couldn't crack 100, usually 70 or 80 on that table.I believe with tighter pockets and high quality equipment will put a premium on running 70 or 80 or 100 balls.We have to make straight pool where its difficult to run a 100 balls like it is in English snooker.


260 balls with 4 1/4 inch pockets! That's amazing.
Well Earl, I think you're the best 9-ball player
ever and I'm sure if straight pool were the main
game being played you'd be on top in that game as
well.
 
pbat2751 said:
Well here a group that would make for an interesting tourney.


Reyes
Strickland
Archer
Sigel
Parica (plays all games well)
Souquet
Grady (the man's forgotten more about 14.1)
Mike Zuglan (good call Koop)
Robles
Hohmann
Buddy Hall
and for a dark horse in the group.... Corey Duel (just convince him he's really playing golf)


replace grady with rempe. throw in ALL the germans cuz they have kick-ass numbers. add a couple of snooker players, and we've REALLY got a tourney.
 
I have a friend that practices all the time with Schmidt that says he never finishes a practice session without running a 100. It's been well documented that he's run 400. I know of other runs of 287 and 297 but I personnally witnessed him run 115 straight out of the car at Starcade in Ft Walton once.The part that was the most impressive about it was,when he started he was dead cold out of the car. and there were only about a dozen in the place as he was running he was walking around the table talking to the railbirds it was like a walk in the park. He did it so effortlessly. I saw Mizerak run 3 100's on Weenie Beenie once gambling back in the 70's ,but I've never seen anyone run a 100 that easily. It's hard for me to see anyone beating him consistantly, but I'm sure there's somone out there I just hope I'm there to see it.
Thanks
 
bruin70 said:
replace grady with rempe. throw in ALL the germans cuz they have kick-ass numbers. add a couple of snooker players, and we've REALLY got a tourney.

I second the Rempe vote. He's great at straight pool.

Chris
 
TATE said:
I second the Rempe vote. He's great at straight pool.

Chris

To me, Tate, Allen Hopkins, Nick Varner and Jim Rempe are all in the same category. A little past their prime but still capable of carving up any opponent in 14.1, even on very tight equipment.
 
BazookaJoe said:
(snip)
Eight ball may use a bit more planning in this area, but it's still a far cry from 14.1.
Note: in 8 ball you may play a break out where you don't care where the other guy's ball ends up. In 14.1 they are all yours, and to leave a bad or difficult shot for your out ball can be a disaster when playing for position to break up the next rack.
(snip).

As an advid 8-Baller, I must respectfully disagree. When a player breaks out a cluster in 8-Ball he had better care where the opponent's balls end up, and he had better put them in trouble. At the same time, he has to relocate his own balls to a good spot. Accomplishing these two, seperate goals simultaneously can make 8-Ball MORE difficult than straight pool. Sometimes.

As for whose the best straight pool player...stop talkin' and start chalkin'...

Jeff Livingston
 
Espn --abc____nbc______cbs____fox

Earl, if I were you I would try to pitch ESPN on a straight pool format.They should buy it and then there would be sponsors other then just pool related which should make for some large purses.I would not have a winner take all.This way a guy still has a chance to at least get his expensivies paid for.That should entice a good field of players.Sorry if off topic but would love to see a good 14-1 match.
 
Back
Top