Why CTE is silly

Status
Not open for further replies.
(Sorry if this has been covered sufficiently above, not all of which I've read. I saw a "required pocketing accuracy" comment, and had a thought about a simple explanation of the issue.)

The center of the object ball needs to go through a "window" that is roughly the width of the pocket minus the width of a ball. That window is roughly one ball wide. Any more to the left or right and the object ball will at least touch a cushion and will probably miss. On worn cloth you can actually see the width of this window in corner pockets as the rail groove is visible where it goes around the corners to the facings.

I would like to put the object ball in the middle half of the window so that there is a little margin to either side, just in case there is a little unexpected roll or skid. That is, I want my pocketing skills to be accurate enough to "hit the middle half." On most corner pockets, that additionally restricted window is close to an inch wide.

Here is a simple rule of thumb to know how many degrees wide that pocket window is: If the object ball is one cue length away from the pocket, the window is one degree wide. If the object ball is half as far from the pocket, the window is two degrees wide. A full-table-length shot, which is about two cue lengths long, has a window only half a degree wide.

(This is based on another rule of thumb: for a typical cue, the width of the butt plate as seen from the tip is close to one degree wide. In a cue length, a 1-inch width is almost exactly one degree.)

If you prefer to think about the full-width window, just multiply my conservative window numbers by two.

Thanks, Bob. That was much more concise that what GMT has written. I always estimate my targets with the edges of the ball, so that would account for the discrepancies in the discussion.
 
After all of these years of discussion and debate, we still don't seem to have a description or demonstration of CTE that is complete, accurate, or acceptable, to either side of the debate!
So I guess I am guilty of mocking some of the outrageous claims made over the years. I am also guilty of mocking the fact that we still don't know what "it" (CTE) is; although, I think my resource page explains how and why "it" works


So, you mock the people that tried their best to explain it?

Let me say this... The folks that have tried to explain how it works did their best to explain the steps and motions. Many on here have said they worked on it until they got it. They put the time and effort into figuring it out.

Now, After all these years have passed you want to blame the people that have tried to help you. If you think the information on your page isn't " complete, accurate, or acceptable, to either side of the debate" then when do you make the effort to get up off your a$$ and get the information yourself directly from the source and then put the accurate information on your page? Then debate it. I don't know how you can even call it a debate. You don't have enough knowledge of the system to debate anything.

Fact is, if Stan didn't decide to do a video 15 years from now you would still be on here insisting CTE does not work based on the information on your page.

I won't respond to your reply to this because I'm not going to run around the cherry tree for another 30 pages with you on this. You can have the last word. I just think it's time you take some ownership.

You don't have complete info because YOU REFUSE to go to the source to get it. Maybe when you change your approach to how you gather information you can move from the 101 stuff you've been selling to something more advanced.
 
The folks that have tried to explain how it works did their best to explain the steps and motions.
...
Now, After all these years have passed you want to blame the people that have tried to help you.
... not true.

On the contrary, I think the video you posted was very good, and I think Spidey's blog is also a good source of information. That is why both of you are quoted at the top of my CTE resource page.

However, beyond what is there, I haven't seen any additional details that help shed light on the "missing pieces of the puzzle." My CTE resource page is an attempt to fill in those missing pieces.

Before creating the articles, illustrations, and analysis, I most definitely "did my homework." I have put in countless hours over many years carefully reading and studying all of these threads, talking on the phone with Hal, Spidey, Ron, and Stan, corresponding with CTE proponents via e-mail and PM, reading Spidey's blog, and trying out at the table everything everybody has suggested to me. So don't say I didn't "do my homework."

Based on everything I have seen, heard, and tried over the years, I think the best explanation for "how and why CTE works" is: "effective pivot length" and/or head alignment must change different amounts for different shots over a wide range CB-OB distances and cut angles (see the CTE resource page for explanations and illustrations). Now, people who use CTE effectively seem to do this naturally, accurately, and consistently. And like anything in pool, the more you do it, the better you get at it.

In addition to trying to understand exactly how and why CTE works, I and others (mostly Colin Colenso) have also identified many benefits a systems like CTE offers to some people.

... get up off your a$$ and get the information yourself directly from the source and then put the accurate information on your page?
I have certainly "done my homework" and don't see a need, nor do I have a desire, to dedicate a lot more time and/or money into learning more about a system that I think I already understand fairly well. Although, I do look forward to watching Stan's DVD to see if he has any new insights or information to offer to the CTE landscape.

You can have the last word.
Thank you.

Maybe when you change your approach to how you gather information you can move from the 101 stuff you've been selling to something more advanced.
I'm sorry you think my website and instructional products are just "101 stuff." You have a right to your own opinion, but many people disagree with you. For example, see some of the praise my Video Encyclopedia of Pool Shots (VEPS) has received recently:

VEPS is definitely not "101" ... neither is my website; although, it does include some good "101" stuff, IMO.

Regards,
Dave
 
You don't have complete info because YOU REFUSE to go to the source to get it. Maybe when you change your approach to how you gather information you can move from the 101 stuff you've been selling to something more advanced.

I certainly don't see how you can claim that. You mean you think Dr. Dave should go get a lesson from, say, Stan Shuffet, and then completely and in all detail present and explain all that on his pool FAQ site?

I don't think that's what Stan would want. If Stan WANTED all his stuff completely and thoroughly explained and presented he would have DONE SO--either here, or even just on his own website. Instead, he's selling a DVD for forty bucks about which his buddy and seeming promoter JoeyA says: "if I had not taken the lesson I can candidly tell you that I would have had some "issues" with the video by itself."

You're living in a fantasy world. NOBODY has come out with a full explanation of CTE "in all it's glory." All that have come out are bits a pieces here and there--but, in fact, even those are enough to COMPLETELY DISMISS IT as an aiming "system."
 
Last edited:
Out of respect for Hal, those that know all are sworn not to tell about CTE.
Even if Dr.Dave knew it all...he would be/is respectfull.:):thumbup:
 
I went to your page Dave to see what changes you have made. What purpose does this post on your CTE page serve? If you aren't trying to instigate what would you call it??

*******************************************************

from BRKNRUN:

Ok...You know people talk like CTE is some sort of Religion....I did some research and this is what I found out.

One day God called Hal to the top of the mountain and he gave him the first part of his new system of pool aiming laws for his people - The Center To Edge method. (CTE summarized the absolutes of spiritual and moral shot makeing that God intended for his people.)

God continued to give direction to his people through Hal, including the civil and ceremonial laws for controlling their CB. Eventually God called Hal to the mountain for 40 days and 40 nights. During this time he gave him instructions for the tabernacle and the CTE instructions. When God finished speaking to Hal on Mount Ivory Rock, he gave him two tablets of stone inscribed by the very finger of God. They contained the CTE instructions.

Meanwhile, the people of the pool world had become impatient while waiting for Hal to return with the instructions from God. Hal had been gone for so long that the people gave up on him and begged Stan to make them Pro-1 so they could worship. So Stan collected offerings of gold from all the people and made a instruction video in the form of Pro-1. Then they held a festival and bowed down to worship their idol. So quickly they had fallen into the idolatry they were accustomed to in the pool world and disobeyed God's CTE instructions.

When Hal came down from the mountain with the tablets of stone, his anger burned when he saw the people given over to idolatry. He threw down the two tablets, smashing them to pieces at the foot of the mountain.

Now you all know why there is not complete written instructions for CTE.

Real useful material Dr Dave
That puts you ranked with GMT
GMT is a POS
And of NO use to the pool world
 
Real useful material Dr Dave
That puts you ranked with GMT
GMT is a POS
And of NO use to the pool world

Just wanted to have that quote for posterity.

It's bad behavior, Petey. Behavior that you deserve to be banned for. Luckily for you, I don't EVER report posts.
 
I certainly don't see how you can claim that. You mean you think Dr. Dave should go get a lesson from, say, Stan Shuffet, and then completely and in all detail present and explain all that on his pool FAQ site?

I don't think that's what Stan would want. If Stan WANTED all his stuff completely and thoroughly explained and presented he would have DONE SO--either here, or even just on his own website. Instead, he's selling a DVD for forty bucks about which his buddy and seeming promoter JoeyA says: "if I had not taken the lesson I can candidly tell you that I would have had some "issues" with the video by itself."

You're living in a fantasy world. NOBODY has come out with a full explanation of CTE "in all it's glory." All that have come out are bits a pieces here and there--but, in fact, even that is enough to COMPLETELY DISMISS IT as an aiming "system."

As usual you aren't on the same page...well, as anyone.

"CTE and PRO-1" do some research before you chime in. We are talking about basic CTE here.

If the Dr did his homework and went directly to the source we would only have one version. Correct?
 
gmtt.jpg

This is the best thing to come out this thread
LMAO Gotta Love it
 
The center of the object ball needs to go through a "window" that is roughly the width of the pocket minus the width of a ball. That window is roughly one ball wide.

"One ball wide" is 2 1/4". I made my window 2" (again, which I think I took directly from your work). So I'll say that your comment is roughly in agreement with my original error figures.
 
As usual you aren't on the same page...well, as anyone.

"CTE and PRO-1" do some research before you chime in. We are talking about basic CTE here.

If the Dr did his homework and went directly to the source we would only have one version. Correct?

Stop beating around the bush. If you have a LINK to the "source," then provide it.

If you mean Hal Houle himself, Dr. Dave (AND Lou Figueroa AND Mike Page) have already claimed to have SPOKEN AT LENGTH to Hal--and not been able to glean any more than Dr. Dave has already put on his site.

If you know exactly what "basic CTE" is then spell it out. What stops you? AFAIK you already DID "spell it out" once and then took the video down. What are YOU confused about?
 
Stop beating around the bush. If you have a LINK to the "source," then provide it.

If you mean Hal Houle himself, Dr. Dave (AND Lou Figueroa AND Mike Page) have already claimed to have SPOKEN AT LENGTH to Hal--and not been able to glean any more than Dr. Dave has already put on his site.

If you know exactly what "basic CTE" is then spell it out. What stops you? AFAIK you already DID "spell it out" once and then took the video down. What are YOU confused about?

I tried to explain. I don't have the ability to express what I see at the table to make it work. I've made that very clear many times. I would have to show someone in person. If you come to the DCC look me up and I will try to help you. You could wear a mask or a costume to hide your true identity.
 
I tried to explain. I don't have the ability to express what I see at the table to make it work. I've made that very clear many times. I would have to show someone in person. If you come to the DCC look me up and I will try to help you. You could wear a mask or a costume to hide your true identity.

It's comments like that which verify for me that CTE isn't a "system." Systems have clear, defined steps and processes. If you can't explain it, then it's not a "system." (unless you have some sort of handicap--which I doubt you do: If you can type and you can play pool, you can explain a system that you USE)

And what about the rest of my post? What's this "source" you refer to? If it's Hal, then Dave HAS gone to the source. So what are you talking about, then?
 
Last edited:
I tried to explain. I don't have the ability to express what I see at the table to make it work. I've made that very clear many times. I would have to show someone in person. If you come to the DCC look me up and I will try to help you. You could wear a mask or a costume to hide your true identity.

His identity protection is VERY important
I would think SOME would like to talk face to face with him
Not me though, I am not in to GEEK SQUAD
 
Last edited:
It's comments like that which verify for me that CTE isn't a "system." Systems have clear, defined steps and processes. If you can't explain it (and you don't have some sort of handicap--which I doubt you do: If you can type and you can play pool, you can explain a system that you USE), then it's not a "system."

And what about the rest of my post? What's this "source" you refer to? If it's Hal, then Dave HAS gone to the source. So what are you talking about, then?

Do you really think that I, or anyone else needs to respond to the little guy throwing stones from behind the wall? I don't have to explain anything to you. You are a coward hiding behind a screen name.

As you like to say...I'm putting you in the 80 and under crowd. :thumbup:
 
Do you really think that I, or anyone else needs to respond to the little guy throwing stones from behind the wall? I don't have to explain anything to you. You are a coward hiding behind a screen name.

So Dr. Dave is RESPONSIBLE to explain exactly what CTE is, Dave says he has posted everything he can FIND, YOU say you KNOW what "basic CTE" is, but you "don't have to explain anything."

That's a pretty messed up little circuit you got going on in your head.

Oh, and now I'm a COWARD for....having a screen name? You mean I have something that I should be afraid of? Both you and Spidey refer to me as a COWARD....so....what? Are you threatening me, that I should have something to cower from?

Gee, I have to say, among other things....that's really GREAT SUPPORT for the strength of your intellectual position on "CTE." :D
 
So Dr. Dave is RESPONSIBLE to explain exactly what CTE is, Dave says he has posted everything he can FIND, YOU say you KNOW what "basic CTE" is, but you "don't have to explain anything."

That's a pretty messed up little circuit you got going on in your head.

Oh, and now I'm a COWARD for....having a screen name? You mean I have something that I should be afraid of? Both you and Spidey refer to me as a COWARD....so....what? Are you threatening me, that I should have something to cower from?

Gee, I have to say, among other things....that's really GREAT SUPPORT for the strength of your intellectual position on "CTE." :D

It is not personal, We just dont like you
FYI I no longer have anything but sarcasm for Dr Dave either
After his quoting and posting of BREAKNRUNS post on his website
 
Last edited:
Status
Not open for further replies.
Back
Top