Why did Earl lose the Hong Kong Color of Money $100,000 match to Efren?

Me personally, as crazy as Earl can be, I don't think it held him back during his career. Sometimes being great and being crazy go hand in hand.
Earl, once you get to really know him is one of the most decent guys you’ll ever meet. He’s always had “issues” though, I hate to use the “C” word. Those issues did hold him back.

People in this sport often talk of opponents attempts at sharking as it’s a prevalent thing in this game. Earl would shark himself with his “issues”. If he didn’t have them he would be more highly regarded than he is now, as he would have won a lot more than he already did. He’s a good guy though.
 
What's with the azz holes constantly bashing people for starting new threads? Instead of being a d head why don't you just stfu and move on?

No, seriously

One of the greatest if not THE greatest match of all time and you few idiots wanna piss all over the thread, just stfu and let people discuss it.
I haven't seen any comments bashing the OP for starting this thread. That must mean my ignore list is working just how I want it to. :)
 
(I am assuming that both players were playing to win. Stranger things have happened when big money is on the line. Does anyone know who the odds makers had winning?) My point: Earl should have had a solid corner man. Maybe someone like Nick Varner would have made a great corner man. Earl was all alone. On the other hand, Efren had a few heavy hitters from the pool industry in his corner. And even some celebrities/politicians if I remember correctly. Earl should have paid Nick's way. Then a bet could have been made in such a way as to cover the cost. Bet a small amount on Efren. Or take it out of Earl's winnings. The cost either way would have been negligible.

My memory is a bit shaky on this but my dim recollection is that Earl had a meltdown towards the end and, according to what I was told by someone who was there, didn't even want to come out of his hotel room for the final day.

I was told, words to the effect, that Earl felt Efren was coming back and was going to, almost inevitably win, saying something like: he comes back, he always comes back.

Lou Figueroa
 
My memory is a bit shaky on this but my dim recollection is that Earl had a meltdown towards the end and, according to what I was told by someone who was there, didn't even want to come out of his hotel room for the final day.

I was told, words to the effect, that Earl felt Efren was coming back and was going to, almost inevitably win, saying something like: he comes back, he always comes back.

Lou Figueroa
Damn!
An odd thought from a man of his abilities and accomplishments.
I'll take self fulfilling prophecies for $400, Alex.
 
My memory is a bit shaky on this but my dim recollection is that Earl had a meltdown towards the end and, according to what I was told by someone who was there, didn't even want to come out of his hotel room for the final day.

I was told, words to the effect, that Earl felt Efren was coming back and was going to, almost inevitably win, saying something like: he comes back, he always comes back.

Lou Figueroa
Funny , but some of Efren's backers did not show up at the venue on the third night because Efren was getting clobbered.
More interesting facts about this match;
It was supposed to.be race to 100 ..It was stretched to 120 somehow.
It was not winner.take all..The parity was 75-25. And Efren still bought a $10K insurance from his US backer, Mark V.
The promoter, Bob Moore, died from suicide months after this event.
 
Earl had the slightly higher gear,

and Efren has the slightly higher overall better match play closing out

story of their careers
Earl seemed to close out the US Open pretty well. I think if he got in the finals, he won. Maybe Efren's calmer demeanor helped him hold up for the 5 day match, though.
Earl let up at 104-87 then Efren's break started working . Efren slow rolled a little and played real good safes .
Caught up Earl at 111. They tied again at 117. Earl breaks and scratches . And from there he just lost his marbles .
Going 7-24 will shake a person's nerves.

I don't think Earl would have listed to any cornerman, even if that cornerman was the Poolgod.

Me personally, as crazy as Earl can be, I don't think it held him back during his career. Sometimes being great and being crazy go hand in hand.
I think there were times when his emotions got the better of him, but those intense emotions were also what drove him to perfect his game. I know it's not 1:1 but the two go hand in hand. I've had since nights where I'm shooting poorly and it's been really hard, but that's also what makes me hit the practice table hard, too. Earl is more than 10% better than me, I'm sure his emotional investment is part of that.
 
Funny , but some of Efren's backers did not show up at the venue on the third night because Efren was getting clobbered.
More interesting facts about this match;
It was supposed to.be race to 100 ..It was stretched to 120 somehow.
It was not winner.take all..The parity was 75-25. And Efren still bought a $10K insurance from his US backer, Mark V.
The promoter, Bob Moore, died from suicide months after this event.
It's the right color anyway...
 
(I am assuming that both players were playing to win. Stranger things have happened when big money is on the line. Does anyone know who the odds makers had winning?) My point: Earl should have had a solid corner man. Maybe someone like Nick Varner would have made a great corner man. Earl was all alone. On the other hand, Efren had a few heavy hitters from the pool industry in his corner. And even some celebrities/politicians if I remember correctly. Earl should have paid Nick's way. Then a bet could have been made in such a way as to cover the cost. Bet a small amount on Efren. Or take it out of Earl's winnings. The cost either way would have been negligible.
I remember it like it was yesterdzay,

Earl was luckier at the start of the match (day 1, and half of day 2) at the end of day 2 both were as lucky.
Day 3 the luck reversed, Efren was muuuuuuch more luckier especially on the break. Every break worked flawlessly for Efren while the break stopped working for Earl even though it had worked in day 1 and day 2....but day 3 the pool gods decided that Earl's break shouldn't work.

Also some tiny stuff in the middle of day 3 where the luck was heavily on Efrens' favor, I remember a foul which got Earl very annoyed. Also a miscue? You can say miscue isnt a luck but I think the break is the big factor on day 3.

It's luck, pure luck because the break swinged, its not like someone learned something! But who knows maybe the racker did something....go back and watch how the break on day 1 Favors earl where he led by 17 racks, then on day 3 the break swang to favor Efren biiiiiig time. Its sad that the most important shot in pool is a luck shot, I know lot of people still swear by "PRACTICE THE BREAK" but thats to me is bullshit because each table is different even if its the same brand, same cloth. And even if you broke on the same table, you can literally come 2 hours later and it'll break different again, so don't tell me "Learn the table you break in" or "practice the break" both of which are bull.

Whenever we find a way to eliminate two things (One is the break, the 2nd needs another thread) in pool then we'll start talkin that pool can get somewhere, until then the game of billiard will stay where it is whereas the most important shot is a luck shot. And the second thing to fix if you want pool to get anywhere is when somebody misses & shot which he intended to pot then it is all left to pool gods to decide what happens next....2way shot is a myth, but that's a topic for another thread I could write a book about this issue.
 
There were some serious moves pulled on Earl the last day. After the match Earl told the promoter he was going to tell everyone what happened. They came to an agreement and the promoter paid Earl the same amount Efren won.
 
there was a great straight pool match about 60 or so years back. one player was supposed to win and he didn't. i don't know why he didn't win or who the players were. what do you think about the situation then and why he lost?
 
Back
Top