WHY DO THE HEATHEN CONTINUE TO RAGE... Part Three

cookie man said:
Those starting with the false premise have no idea what CTE really is.
Click to expand...
That is correct. The CTEers with the false premise have no idea of what CTE really is. PJ & others have been trying to explain the Truthful Reality for years, but the hard case believers simply will not acknowledge that truthful reality as they cling to the false premise of a supposed Objective System.
 
French Roots said:
That is correct. The CTEers with the false premise have no idea of what CTE really is. PJ & others have been trying to explain the Truthful Reality for years, but the hard case believers simply will not acknowledge that truthful reality as they cling to the false premise of a supposed Objective System.
Click to expand...
LMAO, PJ is your witness. Pj has thought CTE was a fractional system for over 20 years, probably close to 30 years. It's not a fractional system, instead it's simply the most OBJECTIVE AND EFFECTIVE system ever.
 
cookie man said:
LMAO, PJ is your witness. Pj has thought CTE was a fractional system for over 20 years, probably close to 30 years. It's not a fractional system, instead it's simply the most OBJECTIVE AND EFFECTIVE system ever.
Click to expand...
PJ has posted.

However, CTE is only a slight variation of fractional because the CTE line has been added in. That slightly augments the factions.

One can use the more normal fractional method & then make a thinning or thickening pivot & get very similar results.
There would just be different processes to that very similar end of maybe right side of pocket vs left side of pocket.

What YOU do NOT realize is that BOTH methods end up being subjective methods.

Like I think PJ as said, they are just different dances to the same point on the dance floor but CTE has more dance steps & gyrations... or something like that.
 
cookie man said:
What YOU do not realize is i don't give 2 shits either way.
Click to expand...
Then why do you so vehemently try to defend against those who say it is a subjective method?

Then why do you personally "attack the messengers" who say it is a subjective method?

Is it just a trolling game to you?
 
French Roots said:
Then why do you so vehemently try to defend against those who say it is a subjective method?

Then why do you personally "attack the messengers" who say it is a subjective method?

Is it just a trolling game to you?
Click to expand...
Did i really personally attack someone? Don't remember doing that. I do remember putting out an open invite if anyone happens to be in Tampa. One person on here has taken me up on it. We had fun and no he wasn't a CTE supporter. PJ has offered to hit some balls should I ever make it to Chicago. I'm sure that will also be fun if it happens.
 
French Roots said:
Then why do you so vehemently try to defend against those who say it is a subjective method?

Then why do you personally "attack the messengers" who say it is a subjective method?

Is it just a trolling game to you?
Click to expand...
I don't give two shits about your opinion because i play a pretty good game of pool using the Objective aim points provided by CTE on every shot. Doesn't matter what your keyboard opinion is
 
French Roots said:
What YOU do NOT realize is that BOTH methods end up being subjective methods.
Click to expand...
cookie man said:
What YOU do not realize is i don't give 2 shits either way.
Click to expand...

It has been my experience that the vast majority of good to great pool players don't even know what an "objective" or "subjective" process is. Lol. And they don't have to know because it doesn't matter.

I can see it now, two aspiring players having a beer together in a poolhall somewhere. One of them says, "I'm thinking about buying that CTE book, just to see if it can help me get better."

The other one says, "Dude, that's a subjective aiming system. The writer says it's objective, but according to some unknown players on AZ billiards, it's really not objective. It's just a trick to get you to buy the book."

"I don't give a shit if it's objective or subjective. I don't even know what the hell that really means. I just wanna check it out and see if it can help my game."

That's the bottom line, the only question that matters....Can it help your game?

Can it help you see shots in a different way?

The only way to know is to try it. Like Poolology, it really doesn't matter what anyone else says or thinks about the system, because all that matters is whether or not it helps you. And only YOU can make that determination.
 
BC21 said:
It has been my experience that the vast majority of good to great pool players don't even know what an "objective" or "subjective" process is. Lol. And they don't have to know because it doesn't matter.

I can see it now, two aspiring players having a beer together in a poolhall somewhere. One of them says, "I'm thinking about buying that CTE book, just to see if it can help me get better."

The other one says, "Dude, that's a subjective aiming system. The writer says it's objective, but according to some unknown players on AZ billiards, it's really not objective. It's just a trick to get you to buy the book."

"I don't give a shit if it's objective or subjective. I don't even know what the hell that really means. I just wanna check it out and see if it can help my game."

That's the bottom line, the only question that matters....Can it help your game?

Can it help you see shots in a different way?

The only way to know is to try it. Like Poolology, it really doesn't matter what anyone else says or thinks about the system, because all that matters is whether or not it helps you. And only YOU can make that determination.
Click to expand...
The sensible person in the room,lol.
 
cookie man said:
Did i really personally attack someone? Don't remember doing that. I do remember putting out an open invite if anyone happens to be in Tampa. One person on here has taken me up on it. We had fun and no he wasn't a CTE supporter. PJ has offered to hit some balls should I ever make it to Chicago. I'm sure that will also be fun if it happens.
Click to expand...
You can forget about PJ. No way is he ever going to show for a game.
He's too entrenched in being the "expert". Playing someone would reveal that he is anything but an "expert"
As Lou Gossett 'preached' in that old movie Officer and a Gentleman==========>
"I will use any means, fair or foul, to trip you up and expose your weaknesses as a potential Naval aviator. You are without a doubt the weakest and most disgusting class I have ever seen. Now get away from me".
View attachment 597443
 
Low500 said:
You can forget about PJ. No way is he ever going to show for a game.
He's too entrenched in being the "expert". Playing someone would reveal that he is anything but an "expert"
As Lou Gossett 'preached' in that old movie Officer and a Gentleman==========>
"I will use any means, fair or foul, to trip you up and expose your weaknesses as a potential Naval aviator. You are without a doubt the weakest and most disgusting class I have ever seen. Now get away from me".
View attachment 597443
Click to expand...
No, PJ and i have talked. If our paths cross we will play a little and have a beer
 
You must log in or register to reply here.
Back
Top