Why don't pool's best and brightest try to break into the snooker scene in the UK?

1If they do not the INS, Border Patrol, and other AGENCIES would love to know about them.

2Sadly it is tough for most Americans to work in a Foreign Country, as they try and protect job for their native born people. If a local has the skill, the local get the job.


3My Cousin had a Jewelry Factory in TJ Mexico years ago, the Mexican Government told him how many American Citizen "managers" he could have, the rest of the work force was Mexicans Citizens.

4BTW our Sheriff Joe's Deputies, and Possess are still doing with Obama People can not seem to accomplish, busting illegals of all nationalities working illegally in Arizona.
1. YOu are living in a dream world if you think that is ture

2-3. Same is true of the US, a company can't hire a foreigner if it can't prove a US citizen is unavailable.

4. What is your point...WTF?
 
Remember what an extra foot and smaller pockets did to SVB? Now expand the surface by 44%. Make the pockets and balls smaller. Change the cloth. Change the rails and the way they react. Change the game and strategy.

Equals = No Chance.

You might as well send Derek Jeter to India to play cricket.
Derek-Jeter11720.jpeg


Now send Derek to India at 7 and he's a killer.
 
Can someone elaborate on this point? We can debate about pool players playing snooker and vice versa, but as far as fundamentals (stroke, stance, etc.) go, is there a reason why Efren's stroke would not work for snooker or why a snooker stroke seems to work just fine for pool?

Efren's action, while clearly pretty useful in pool, is loaded with variables which would likely cause problems on the bigger table with the smaller pockets. Watch this video:

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=8DYDMMw5TtE&NR=1

See how far his cue moves up and down, and how far it actually comes off the line of the shot on his backswing. Also note how early his head and upper body move - long before he actually strikes the cue ball. Compare this with any top snooker pro and you'll see much less movement across the board. You would struggle to find many examples of top players whose cue visibly departs from the line of aim, and none would come anywhere close to what you see from Efren in that first straight-on view.

In snooker terms, Efren's action leaves him with far too much that can go wrong. Next to someone like Neil Robertson, Shaun Murphy, John Higgins, just about any professional player, his action is pretty chaotic. This is in no way a dig at the great man, he just plays a different game. None of the snooker players I've mentioned would like to play him at his own game for their living. When it comes to snooker on a 6x12, though, there are harsher limits to what you can get away in terms of technique. I don't think the Filipino-style would translate all that well.
 
If I bump into him soon I'll ask a friend of mine about this. He is on Phils list of Canadian snooker champions above. One day before nationals a few years back he told me that he would play both snooker and 8/9 ball only if snooker was before pool. He said that when they hold the 8/9 ball ahead of snooker he won't play pool because it messes up his snooker stroke. Like I said, if I see him soon I'll ask why and post it up.

Dave <--- will have to go to a golf course to find Daryl, but that's OK too :thumbup:

If you play snooker after pool you can feel like a machine which has had some of the nuts work a little loose. Everything feels nice and easy, but there is some play where there shouldn't be.

The other trap is not being conscious of a need to shift the the balance of concentration more away from getting shape and more towards making the ball (until after you have missed!). It sounds obvious, but it is actually quite subtle
 
Remember what an extra foot and smaller pockets did to SVB? Now expand the surface by 44%. Make the pockets and balls smaller. Change the cloth. Change the rails and the way they react. Change the game and strategy.

Tournament snooker tables have heated slate to speed things up a bit :D
 
Have to disagree here with anyone who thinks a pool player could make it in Snooker. It ain't gonna happen anytime soon. These top snooker players start out as kids and play all the time for many years to make it. A year or two isn't going to cut it for a Dechaine, Alex, Shane, Jesse Engel or anyone else you can name.

Maybe if a young player like Jesse started now playing snooker full time, he might be competitive in five years! He would have to give up pool and move to England and compete on the lower levels first. Then it would be a long climb to the top.

Yes, Rempe and Mizerak tried to make it over there. Both put 6x12 tables in their homes to practice on. Jimmy played in many qualifying events for two to three years. He may have made it to the final 32 ONCE! Later he told me, he had no chance against the best players! And he was at the top of his game then. Mizerak was only the best pool player on the planet when he tried to play snooker professionally. He didn't fare any better than Rempe.

He told Phil Windham (Owner of the Chattanooga Billiard Club) and myself pretty much the same thing back in the mid-90s. He also said something to the effect that as far he was concerned the "transition from pool to snooker is 100 times harder then the other way around". (Then he beat up on me bad .... real bad :( .)
 
I never played snooker on 12' tables to speak of - most were 10'. But at age 16 (1966), I quit playing for awhile because nobody in this part of the country could touch me at that game... it had became boring. With some of the same training and practice that many of the foreign born pros have, I think I could have made it to top tier back then. But that wasn't even a remote possibility.

The single best snooker player I ever encountered was someone that called himself "Canadian Pete" and that was about 1990. I (and those betting on me) busted him and his backers three nights in row. Surprisingly, he came back for a fourth night with some new backers and I was begged into going in and playing him even though I was quite ill. Even told the guys that I was NOT going to bet on myself because I wouldn't be able to play well, but they dived in anyway.

I watched him play 8 frames (his choice, playing only 6 red) while barely getting out of my chair and when I did it was nothing but frustration. I quit after his 8 straight wins and even then the guys betting on me were urging me to continue. I refused. There was no point as I was too sick to even aim properly... and I believe he was chemically enhanced.

He told me that I was the only player in the States that could and had faded his game.

This is not a brag, just some ancient history and I would still like to know who that fellow really was.

I can also tell you that David Matlock would surely have made an excellent snooker player anywhere. Louis Roberts would probably not have.
 
Last edited:
the U.K. snooker pros have started in the sport by rising to the top through a vast field of players, in their teen years, obtaining a sponsor to help with training and practice expenses, then rising to the elite pro level by being in the top percentile in that group. i am sure many of our U.K. AZ'ers will confirm the arduous task it truly is, to become a snooker pro capable of world competition.[the top 168].as well as our players in the U.S. that have actually been in pro snooker in the U.K.

on another note, the lion, who held all snooker/pool titles in Canada at once, is one pool player i believe who was capable, with the right discipline to join that circle in his early years.

i would love to see the magician playing on U.K. snooker equipment, as would a great many others. it would be a rare glimpse of genius at work, and fascinating to observe such a revered player negotiate a foreign discipline with his great talent.

you may remember the invitational with steve davis and steve mizerak. steve showed the utmost respect for mizeraks cue ball talents although his snooker accomplishments were supelative. if i am not mistaken, davis said he thought that is was harder for a snooker player to run 100 in 14.1 than a pool player to compile a break of 100 in snooker.





i don't want to open a big P#####ing match about U.S. pool players, i just offered a little more depth to the subject.

I remember it well - they played 9 ball, 14.1, and Snooker, which meant
the match was heavily weighted in Miz's favor.

This was before Davis had played much pool, and he was very generious
in his assesment of players. I can't recall details but Davis did run more
than just a few balls in Straight Pool and Miz actually won one 'frame'
of the Snooker.

Dale
 
I never played snooker on 12' tables to speak of - most were 10'. But at age 16 (1966), I quit playing for awhile because nobody in this part of the country could touch me at that game... it had became boring. With some of the same training and practice that many of the foreign born pros have, I think I could have made it to top tier back then. But that wasn't even a remote possibility.

The single best snooker player I ever encountered was someone that called himself "Canadian Pete" and that was about 1990. I (and those betting on me) busted him and his backers three nights in row. Surprisingly, he came back for a fourth night with some new backers and I was begged into going in and playing him even though I was quite ill. Even told the guys that I was NOT going to bet on myself because I wouldn't be able to play well, but they dived in anyway.

I watched him play 8 frames (his choice, playing only 6 red) while barely getting out of my chair and when I did it was nothing but frustration. I quit after his 8 straight wins and even then the guys betting on me were urging me to continue. I refused. There was no point as I was too sick to even aim properly... and I believe he was chemically enhanced.

He told me that I was the only player in the States that could and had faded his game.

This is not a brag, just some ancient history and I would still like to know who that fellow really was.

I can also tell you that David Matlock would surely have made an excellent snooker player anywhere. Louis Roberts would probably not have.

Would that be Peter Giacinti by chance? I don't know if he went by the handle of Canadian Pete or not but I do know he was Canadian and one hell of a snooker player. Sorry to say he passed away about a year ago.

Screen shot 2011-06-06 at 12.33.27 PM.png
 
Last edited:
I really couldn't say for certain. He surely doesn't look like the guy I remember but 21 years can change appearances pretty dramatically. I recall the guy being about 6ft tall and of medium build. I know he was known at Shooter's in Olathe.

I also think he looked more like he had northern European features. There has been a lot of water under the bridge since then. :embarrassed2:

After reading the article you linked, I'm sure that isn't him. I would bet my shorts the fellow I played was NOT a family man.
 
Last edited:
Can someone elaborate on this point? We can debate about pool players playing snooker and vice versa, but as far as fundamentals (stroke, stance, etc.) go, is there a reason why Efren's stroke would not work for snooker or why a snooker stroke seems to work just fine for pool?

I feel a precise 'piston' stroke is mandatory for snooker....
..if you don't have long distance accuracy you're dead.
That's also why aged players can no longer win.
That is also why I feel Buddy Hall's stroke could work at snooker...
...in his prime I like his stroke as much as Steve Davis'.

Alex has beaten 3 Canuck champs in tournaments and a two-time champ
for serious cash...but it's too late for him to switch...even though he has
the 'piston' stroke required.

Danny Diliberto can run a century on a 6x12 but to have the long distance
range he would've had to change his whole approach.

Rempe has been the best pool player to play snooker in Britain but like
I said he went too late in life.

my opinion, of course
 
I really couldn't say for certain. He surely doesn't look like the guy I remember but 21 years can change appearances pretty dramatically. I recall the guy being about 6ft tall and of medium build. I know he was known at Shooter's in Olathe.

I also think he looked more like he had northern European features. There has been a lot of water under the bridge since then. :embarrassed2:

After reading the article you linked, I'm sure that isn't him. I would bet my shorts the fellow I played was NOT a family man.

With his name being Pete and his being a well known and very accomplished snooker player (won many tournaments going undefeated) from Canada I took a shot. Don't sound like the same guy cause the Pete I knew was very much a family man.
 
I feel a precise 'piston' stroke is mandatory for snooker....
..if you don't have long distance accuracy you're dead.
That's also why aged players can no longer win.
That is also why I feel Buddy Hall's stroke could work at snooker...
...in his prime I like his stroke as much as Steve Davis'.

Alex has beaten 3 Canuck champs in tournaments and a two-time champ
for serious cash...but it's too late for him to switch...even though he has
the 'piston' stroke required.

Danny Diliberto can run a century on a 6x12 but to have the long distance
range he would've had to change his whole approach.

Rempe has been the best pool player to play snooker in Britain but like
I said he went too late in life.

my opinion, of course

When talking with Rempe (See post 46) he made mention of wishing he had started as soon as he could pick up a snooker cue and that if he had he would have certainly fared better.
 
2003

Alain Robidoux

Cliff Thorburn

2002

Kirk Stevens

Cliff Thorburn

...

1975

Cliff Thorburn

Bill Werbenuik

1974

Cliff Thorburn

Julien St. Denis

Alain Robidoux, that's the guy that threw a hissy fit when Ronnie O'Sullivan started playing him left-handed right? That was one of the more excruciating things I've seen in a snooker match when they were both just bashing the colors around when the frame was already well decided.

Great to see former world No. 1 Cliff Thorburn still competing in Canada, much later than I knew he'd kept playing, up to a high standard being the champ in 1974 and then runner up nearly 30 years later.

I have many fond memories of watching big Bill Werbenuik as well. Also I'll never forget that Kirk Stevens 147 in the white suit - the last 5 or 6 pots to clear up the colors and take the maximum prize were sensational under pressure.

Ah, just saying those names makes me miss the glory days of snooker.
 
Last edited:
Thanks :thumbup:

Well, Your welcome. I am still waiting for a answer from my father. But, I did get answer from my Aunt that remembered a Canadian Pete. She said she couldn't remember if he came from Ontario or not. She believed that he was more from the west BC area. So I will try to confirm this with my father at the same time.
 
I think there was a different fellow that went by the nickname of Canadian Pete (different than the one I played although the name would have fit just the same... if he was telling the truth).
 
The guy you call Canadian Pete came through Indy and got busted playing golf on the snooker table at Executive. He didn't even have a chance really. But there were lots of Canadian snooker people who came in to try to win some playing Golf and it was a rare occasion when the horse lost.

I never played snooker on 12' tables to speak of - most were 10'. But at age 16 (1966), I quit playing for awhile because nobody in this part of the country could touch me at that game... it had became boring. With some of the same training and practice that many of the foreign born pros have, I think I could have made it to top tier back then. But that wasn't even a remote possibility.

The single best snooker player I ever encountered was someone that called himself "Canadian Pete" and that was about 1990. I (and those betting on me) busted him and his backers three nights in row. Surprisingly, he came back for a fourth night with some new backers and I was begged into going in and playing him even though I was quite ill. Even told the guys that I was NOT going to bet on myself because I wouldn't be able to play well, but they dived in anyway.

I watched him play 8 frames (his choice, playing only 6 red) while barely getting out of my chair and when I did it was nothing but frustration. I quit after his 8 straight wins and even then the guys betting on me were urging me to continue. I refused. There was no point as I was too sick to even aim properly... and I believe he was chemically enhanced.

He told me that I was the only player in the States that could and had faded his game.

This is not a brag, just some ancient history and I would still like to know who that fellow really was.

I can also tell you that David Matlock would surely have made an excellent snooker player anywhere. Louis Roberts would probably not have.
 
Golf requires "special" :wink: skills and one must be intimately familiar with the individual table to really play it well. I loved to play golf but actually felt it hurt my stroke when it came to playing snooker. I think he would have left a different impression in a pure snooker game.
 
Back
Top