Why is every cue for sale now days a " monster "

tommyhill

AzB Silver Member
Silver Member
I am not in to rant and rave but I do have to say that I am tired of everyone advertising their mid level cues as monsters. I know people want to sell their goods and I understand advertising but what about realistic descriptions and morals and honesty. Well thats my rant , sorry to waste your time if yoy read this.
 
im sorry i read that too, but since i did

its called a sales pitch, trying to catch an eye of a buyer whos looking to spend some scratch
 
I would suggest you don't read ads for pre-owned cars. Every car is listed as "loaded," even the ones that come with only base factory standard equipment. Then again, maybe they mean it's loaded standard features.
 
Here is where your rant makes no sense. While the term gets used a lot, since when did you become the authority on what a "monster" hit feels like? The feel of a cue is 100% subjective to each individual person.

I have seen with my own eyes a very high level player pick up a cheap no name cue that someone we mutually know had just picked up as they were new to pool. They actually were highly impressed with how good it hit for being a no name cue. Yet I bet give it to the next person & they think it might hit like garbage. Who is wrong? The answer is no one because it is all subjective.
 
Nothing to do with now a day, it's been that way as long as I can remember. Probably sells better as a monster than as a unicorn..
 
Here is where your rant makes no sense. While the term gets used a lot, since when did you become the authority on what a "monster" hit feels like? The feel of a cue is 100% subjective to each individual person.

I have seen with my own eyes a very high level player pick up a cheap no name cue that someone we mutually know had just picked up as they were new to pool. They actually were highly impressed with how good it hit for being a no name cue. Yet I bet give it to the next person & they think it might hit like garbage. Who is wrong? The answer is no one because it is all subjective.

He's not talking about hit. He's talking about the overall cue being described as a 'monster'. I think his gripe is with people taking a mid-level cue from a lower-tier/lesser known maker and saying "This is a monster!!!!" because it has 40 ivory inlaws in a typical 4 point hoppe.

In the past, 'monster' was often used to refer to Black Boars or Manzinos or Ginas (etc.) that were EXTREMELY ornate/fancy.

But what you said DOES apply. It's all subjective. A hoppe cue with 40 inlays from some cuemaker you or I never heard of may be the DREAM CUE of someone else. And it may be the fanciest cue said cuemaker ever made. So yeah. 'Monster' is just like "hits a ton". It's a sales pitch. Nothing more.
 
He's not talking about hit. He's talking about the overall cue being described as a 'monster'. I think his gripe is with people taking a mid-level cue from a lower-tier/lesser known maker and saying "This is a monster!!!!" because it has 40 ivory inlaws in a typical 4 point hoppe.

In the past, 'monster' was often used to refer to Black Boars or Manzinos or Ginas (etc.) that were EXTREMELY ornate/fancy.

But what you said DOES apply. It's all subjective. A hoppe cue with 40 inlays from some cuemaker you or I never heard of may be the DREAM CUE of someone else. And it may be the fanciest cue said cuemaker ever made. So yeah. 'Monster' is just like "hits a ton". It's a sales pitch. Nothing more.

Same point still stands, no one is an authority on what a monster cue looks like.
 
Here is where your rant makes no sense. While the term gets used a lot, since when did you become the authority on what a "monster" hit feels like? The feel of a cue is 100% subjective to each individual person.

I have seen with my own eyes a very high level player pick up a cheap no name cue that someone we mutually know had just picked up as they were new to pool. They actually were highly impressed with how good it hit for being a no name cue. Yet I bet give it to the next person & they think it might hit like garbage. Who is wrong? The answer is no one because it is all subjective.
Then they should post that this feels like a monster cue TO ME. Not just blurt out that this IS a monster cue. Are you able to grasp the difference ???
 
Monsters Are A Myth Whereas Grandiose Cue Designs Aren't.

A lot of people, i.e., cue owners, tend to exaggerate and sometimes it can lead to some whoppers.
The term monster has lost all meaning when it comes to pool cue designs or the cue's performance.
No one that spent an appreciable amount of money for a custom cue, or any cue for that matter, wants
to hear, or learn, the cue just isn't all that person imagines it to be. Let's just consider this pool cue ego.

A lot of people buy a cue and come down with buyers remorse pretty quickly. The cue might look nice
but plays like shit or the design was different in person than how it looked in the sale thread. They can't
tell you why the cue doesn't feel right but they can tell you that they don't like the hit and feel. So now
they have a cue they want to move and that's where the exaggeration factor comes into play. They're
tempted to write anything that makes their cue sound so much better than it actually is to make a sale.

The term monster has become a hackneyed expression used to describe pool cues. It's meaningless
except to the FS thread's author nowadays. There are no monsters anymore, just exceptionally great
pool cues that stand heads above others. People will post photos of their cues in the Cue Gallery and
become offended if and when anyone points some workmanship flaws or criticizes their cue's design.
The reality is beauty is always seen through the eyes of the beholder & never the eyes of the cue owner.


The way you judge a pool cue is totally subjective and that applies to how you describe the cue too.
Lots of people overrate the cue-maker, the cue design, or the way the cue plays or feels.......to them.
The way others react to their cues becomes very important and the owner/seller tends to embellish &
overrate their cue as much for their own ego & satisfaction as it may also prove helpful to make a sale.



Matt B.
 
A lot of people, i.e., cue owners, tend to exaggerate and sometimes it can lead to some whoppers.
The term monster has lost all meaning when it comes to pool cue designs or the cue's performance.
No one that spent an appreciable amount of money for a custom cue, or any cue for that matter, wants
to hear, or learn, the cue just isn't all that person imagines it to be. Let's just consider this pool cue ego.

A lot of people buy a cue and come down with buyers remorse pretty quickly. The cue might look nice
but plays like shit or the design was different in person than how it looked in the sale thread. They can't
tell you why the cue doesn't feel right but they can tell you that they don't like the hit and feel. So now
they have a cue they want to move and that's where the exaggeration factor comes into play. They're
tempted to write anything that makes their cue sound so much better than it actually is to make a sale.

The term monster has become a hackneyed expression used to describe pool cues. It's meaningless
except to the FS thread's author nowadays. There are no monsters anymore, just exceptionally great
pool cues that stand heads above others. People will post photos of their cues in the Cue Gallery and
become offended if and when anyone points some workmanship flaws or criticizes their cue's design.
The reality is beauty is always seen through the eyes of the beholder & never the eyes of the cue owner.


The way you judge a pool cue is totally subjective and that applies to how you describe the cue too.
Lots of people overrate the cue-maker, the cue design, or the way the cue plays or feels.......to them.
The way others react to their cues becomes very important and the owner/seller tends to embellish &
overrate their cue as much for their own ego & satisfaction as it may also prove helpful to make a sale.



Matt B.
More plainly put, they're lying !!!
 
I agree, sellers should use more absolute terms, things that can be measured. Such as describing a cue 'hits like a ton' :-)

I'm waiting for a seller to describe a 6 pointer SouthWest as rare because Laurie or Jerry Franklin didn't make many sneaky petes with extra points and a wrap. :-)

I am not in to rant and rave but I do have to say that I am tired of everyone advertising their mid level cues as monsters. I know people want to sell their goods and I understand advertising but what about realistic descriptions and morals and honesty. Well thats my rant , sorry to waste your time if yoy read this.
 
Last edited:
Simple question. A monster is at least $3000. So if you want more than 3k for your cue, you call it a monster.

"Hits a ton" is worth another $300 on top of the total price.
 
Back
Top