Why no called shots in 9 ball or 10 ball?

fair rule

MisterBanker said:
I have an Accu-Stats tape from Grady Mathews' Back Pocket 9-ball tournament from a few years back. In it shots and safeties had to be called. If you missed a called shot and your opponent was hooked, you could be told to shoot again. I thought the rules were fantastic and they took nothing away from the game or made it any less interesting.

Now that would be a fair rule. Butterflycues
 
Someone PMed me admonishing me to read...

Here's what they sent me:

Subject: READ
"Maybe you kneed to learn to read. Did you see any where in my post that I said that luck only happens in nine ball?"


And here's my response:


"I read quite well, thanks! Luck happens in all pool games. However, the balls count without calling them in various games, and one pocket, arguably the most difficult of games, doesn't require balls to be called...

Have a nice day!"


Upon closer examination of the obviously irked PMer's message, whose identity is protected in my post here, one finds an egregious misspelling... "need" is the correct word in the first sentence, not "kneed".

While composing this post, said irked poster sent me a further PM, to wit:


"That was my point, it appeared to me that you were replying to my post and I never said anything about luck only happening in nine ball."


Glad to see we now think alike.

Cheers!

Flex
 
because

why is the sky blue? or grass green? because god made them that way... because those are the rules plain and simple
 
9 ball call

bagofpaper said:
Why are the rules this way?

So players have the option of trying to get lucky on kick shots? I think (perhaps naively) you should have to pick a pocket. That gives you a 1 in 6 chance even if you guess randomly..

Just curious over here. I'm sure there's some historical reason.

Historical reason: yeah. 9 ball was invented during the great depression by black hustlers who wanted a FAST and exciting game to bet on. Rotation was too long with all 15 balls on the table and runouts were tough. Remember winner breaks is the original format where a good player could really shine by stacking racks, luck or whatever. A fun and exciting game. Lots of $$$$$$$$$ changing hands attracts players. Now we have TV versions with all the safties and alternate breaks.
 
bagofpaper said:
What the hell kind of response is that?! Even if I had the time to spend 6 hours a day in a pool room 6-7 days a week for a full year (I wish I had the time believe me), I still wouldn't get an answer to this question seeing as nobody plays the game with called shots. I figured it would a bit more efficient to ask people who do have enough time.. or did.

What you think that I want or expect to become a better player by asking this kind of question on an internet forum.. please you are insulting me with that crap.

Kinda funny though.. I half expected a response like this to a simple question. I'm not knocking you Fatboy and I'm not really offended.. But.. since you can't get out to the pool hall 6 hours a day everyday maybe you have time on your hands to give me an answer that addresses my original question.


i was just busting balls last night, seriously i paid my dues with longer hours than that playing pool years ago, for many years, then i retired, now i'm back.

the answere to that question comes with experience, i have played call pocket pool, straight pool, banks and one pocket are awawly call pocket, 8 ball can be either, i perfer it not to be call pocket.

9 ball is a fast game played at a high level you can string rack after rack if your good enough, usually at a B level or higher there isnt much slop anyways, so there isnt much need to play call pocket and the luck factor is part of the fun like the dice in backgammon compaired to chess with no dice.

sorry for busting your balls, i dont do that often. i wont anymore.

cheers
 
cuetechasaurus said:
I'll explain to you exactly why call-shot doesn't work in 9ball and 10ball. It's because it makes it extremely unfair to the player who gets hooked after a missed shot.

Think about it. Player 'A' misses a shot, and player 'B' is hooked. Player 'B' kicks at the shot and lucks it in, but it doesn't count. It makes the game WAY too rewarding for missing and hooking your opponent on accident. If you are going to implement call-shot, then you need to implement calling safeties to make it fair. The problem with doing that, is that when it's call-safeties, it totally eliminates two-way shots.

A perfect post, but I'll just add that eliminating two-way shots takes a lot of skill out of the game. It is the multi-purpose shots that are the most interesting in nine ball.

For some reason, everybody that has ever suggested call shot nine ball lives in denial on the point that some of the skill and beauty of the game are removed.
 
nyneball said:
Historical reason: yeah. 9 ball was invented during the great depression by black hustlers who wanted a FAST and exciting game to bet on. Rotation was too long with all 15 balls on the table and runouts were tough. Remember winner breaks is the original format where a good player could really shine by stacking racks, luck or whatever. A fun and exciting game. Lots of $$$$$$$$$ changing hands attracts players. Now we have TV versions with all the safties and alternate breaks.
What is a "black hustler" and where can I find this enlightning historic fact in writing by a legitimate source? :rolleyes: :cool:

Gene
 
sjm said:
For some reason, everybody that has ever suggested call shot nine ball lives in denial on the point that some of the skill and beauty of the game are removed.

I guess I'm the exception that proves the rule. :D I proposed a call shot 9-ball rule set a week or so ago due to the constant arguments between the Pushout crowd and the Texas Express folks. Once you made your point, I completely agreed that I had overlooked the two-way shots. You guys are right; it just wouldn't work.

That said, I say the 9-ball on the break shouldn't count as a win. That is probably the one rule that I think is completely useless. You can change that rule without the ripple effect you'd have with call-shot. There's no beauty, IMO, of a 9-ball flying in on the break. Yes, it evens out in the long run, but in a match you don't have a long run available. Even when I make the 9-ball on the break, I feel guilty about it. Rack your own, no 9-balls on the break, especially with short races and on crappy equipment where it takes forever to get a good rack. :)
 
MisterBanker said:
I have an Accu-Stats tape from Grady Mathews' Back Pocket 9-ball tournament from a few years back. In it shots and safeties had to be called. If you missed a called shot and your opponent was hooked, you could be told to shoot again. I thought the rules were fantastic and they took nothing away from the game or made it any less interesting.


i think that format would make safeties to easy. i mean, instead of controlling two balls to play safe you just have to pick the ball before a problem ball and call safe and make that ball without getting shape (unless they make a rule where the ball you are hitting has to stay on the table during a safe or something, but that would really complicate things). 9 ball is fine with the luck factor. if you lose to someone it doesnt matter if they got lucky, the fault rests with the seller's lack of skill in leaving the player a shot that they could get lucky on (or any shot at all).
 
Last edited:
I suspect that one of the reasons that 9-ball is suited for TV is because of the "surprise factor", in which a player in a tough situation surprises everyone with a shot no one imagined. A ball goes in from nowhere and the crowd wonders if the player planned the shot or got lucky. Calling the pocket would take that away since everyone would be looking for the proposed "solution".

Of course this is the bread and butter for the hustler. He can make skilled shots look like accidents.
 
black hustler

Cuedog said:
What is a "black hustler" and where can I find this enlightning historic fact in writing by a legitimate source? :rolleyes: :cool:

Gene
I dont expect any writing will support facts in this matter. Think of Chicago in 1932 and bars with pool tables. South Side. Then ask yourself a question: did Wyatt Earp invent 9 ball?
 
Fatboy said:
i was just busting balls last night, seriously i paid my dues with longer hours than that playing pool years ago, for many years, then i retired, now i'm back.

the answere to that question comes with experience, i have played call pocket pool, straight pool, banks and one pocket are awawly call pocket, 8 ball can be either, i perfer it not to be call pocket.

9 ball is a fast game played at a high level you can string rack after rack if your good enough, usually at a B level or higher there isnt much slop anyways, so there isnt much need to play call pocket and the luck factor is part of the fun like the dice in backgammon compaired to chess with no dice.

sorry for busting your balls, i dont do that often. i wont anymore.

cheers

lol Fatboy you always crack me up on here.. bust away all you want and thanks for the straight post!
 
Oh, and thanks to everyone who had time to respond..

I was simply asking "why" and not condoning one form of the game or the other. (And I can never get the search thing to work correctly!:) )
 
My personal point of view is to just leave the game as is. For the most part, if the skill level of the two players is considerably decent, then there won't be that much slop.

Also, several people mentioned that they would like the called shot so they don't lose to weaker players. What happens then, is the weaker players realize they have little chance in tournament play and quit coming to the tournaments. This then causes prize money to decrease, with the tournaments eventually drying up. Seen it happen several times.
 
smokeandapancak said:
I see what youre getting at with your question.......
My best answert is that 9 ball was made/ grew to be to be a quick game mainly for gambles..... it wasnt meant to be a "skill" game like 14.1 or 1p.... the slop shots add to the gamble/luck factor....
BINGO!! As Mosconi supposedly said, "Why should I play a game where my opponent can win on the break?" My guess is that the guys who really like the modern 9-ball rules are the same guys who believe they have a chance to beat the slot machines...:D

Doc
Likes "Grady's rules"
 
Cuebacca said:
...
That said, I say the 9-ball on the break shouldn't count as a win. That is probably the one rule that I think is completely useless. You can change that rule without the ripple effect you'd have with call-shot. There's no beauty, IMO, of a 9-ball flying in on the break. Yes, it evens out in the long run, but in a match you don't have a long run available. Even when I make the 9-ball on the break, I feel guilty about it. Rack your own, no 9-balls on the break, especially with short races and on crappy equipment where it takes forever to get a good rack. :)
I agree. The nineball should be spotted and the player pocketing the ball should still own the table. I don't see a basis for rewarding a player for pocketing the nine by giving the game to him/her. That person is as surprised it went in as everyone else is!
I've only seen a couple of players that could send the nine towards one or the other of the bottom two holes consistently anyway. One was "Neptune" Joe Frady.

Gene
 
bagofpaper said:
Why are the rules this way?

So players have the option of trying to get lucky on kick shots? I think (perhaps naively) you should have to pick a pocket. That gives you a 1 in 6 chance even if you guess randomly..

Just curious over here. I'm sure there's some historical reason.

I think it's because it stemmed from "Rotation", a game bangers could only play because they could ride the high point balls and slop counted. I don't think when 9 ball was invented they figured that some players would get as good as they did and run out as frequently as they do.

I like the rules the way they are, but prefer to see play on tight tables - at least as tight as diamond pros. This helps with the slop and stringing racks. I played a few weeks ago on a standard Gold Crown with fast rails and slop happened way too often - it was pretty ridiculous. If I had to play on that equipment, I would probably favor call shot too.

Chris
 
the only thing I dont like about spotting the 9 on the break is.

Say you make the 9 on the break, well you spot the 9ball, and the CB is behind another ball, so now not only did you have to spot the 9ball, when it should be consider'd a win, but you dont have a shot on the OB and you have to push out.

Or say you make the 9ball, plus another ball, but when you spot the 9ball, the CB, is behind the 9ball, so you dont have a open shot at the OB. Which I seen happen to Jeanette Lee before.
 
I think this sums it up

from:

http://www.9ballpool.com/history.htm

Up to the 1980's, the most popular form of pool was called 14.1 but many thought it a slow and boring game often with the predictable outcome of the best player winning with no chance for an underdog. So a new version was devised whereby the only ball that counted for anything was the 9 ball - hence the term 9 ball pool; this in turn meant that the outcome wouldn't be so obvious and any player could win - a new and exciting element which has contributed to 9 ball becoming one of the most popular and fastest growing sports in the world.

When you play 9 ball you take a chance. It is not a complete skill game. The whole idea is anyone can win.
 
Back
Top