Kevin Lindstrom said:
I think in decades past that the lousy economy had driven people to play more pool. Maybe it was the gambling(a way to possibly make some money).
Maybe because it was cheaper than other forms of entertainments.
Do you think the poor economy will help our sport or hurt our sport?
Thanks
Kevin
Kevin, that's a great question. IMO it will hurt pool. Pool used to be a poor mans game. Pool rooms used to be quiet, dark, smoked filled places, where the only noise you heard, were the clicking of the balls, and low whispers. (The way it ought to be, and wish it still was, although some might not agree.)
When I was kid, pool was between .50-.90 cents per hour. In my dads day, it was something like a nickel. Like I said, it was a poor mans game. If you were rich, you had your own table, and had no need for a pool hall. So, the game was a great passtime, even during the depression, because it was affordable, even for the poor.
Not so today. Today we have the brightly lit, brass, glass, cocktail waitress, blaring juke box, "yuppatoriums", that pool has become. It became somewhat of a yuppy trend, and far from the game it was, even 30 years ago. At $10.00-$15.00 an hour table rates in most cities, (and even small towns), it's no longer a the poor mans form of cheap entertainment. Unless your a gambler, and you can run 'em, pool is not the cheapest way to have a good time any more. Sad, really. I'm not rich, but I'm not poor either, and if wasn't that I have access to pool tables that I can play on for free, I wouldn't be able to afford to play myself.
Just my $0.02.