Thanks for all the replies.
Cuebacca said:Rack-for-each-other should be obsolete. So should the 9-ball counting on the break. That would pretty much eliminate the problems associated with rack mechanics, lazy rackers and people who just flat out are incapable of getting all the balls racked tight. So, yes, rack-your-own is a step in right direction even thought it's ridiculous that the 9-ball still counts on the break....
jackson said:Interesting what you say about the nine going in on the break - if you recall Earl Strickland's million dollar win (where he ran 11 racks) - he was, according to Billiards Digest Magazine, doing the racking - I don't remember how many times the nine ball went in on the break - but it was quite a few for 11 racks - Jackson
mullyman said:Actually I like the idea of eliminating the 9 on the break if you rack for yourself. I would even say take that one step further and say any balls made on the break are spotted up and you keep shooting. It's so easy to loosen up that corner ball to go straight into the corner
mooseman said:Rack your own is the only way to go. We started that in our league after the BCAPL rules changed. This is an 8-ball league. The folks that complain would typically say, "You're going to rack to your advantage!!!!" Well the answer is DUH at least I won't give myself a bad rack. Oh BTW the opponent does have the opportunity to inspect the rack.
9-ball might be another matter because I suppose you could better rack to your advantage. Of course in Vegas it was alternate break as well.
CocoboloCowboy said:I personally do not like the Winner Racks, Winner Breaks thing, as the first time I encountered it, the guy I was playing was Manipulating the RACK so the NINE BALL was almost Sure to Pocket on the BREAK.
I like Winner Breaks, Looser Racks.:smile:
Jimmy M. said:That's why we play winner racks/breaks, 9 (or 10, playing 10-ball) doesn't count in the bottom two pockets on our tour. There's nothing left to argue about there. If you get a bad rack, you gave it to yourself, and you don't have to worry about your opponent rigging the rack so the 9 or 10 shoots out into the corner.
stuckart said:If you rack your own and get a bad rack, who can you blame?
!
enzo said:down here in california we play rack your own, with an obligatory condition.... that the talented (here unnamed) mexicans can complain for 20 minutes both during actual shots and while racking if you happen to put 2 or more on them. indeed, the tournament directors (again, unnamed, cough, "big wave" something or other, cough cough) even reward them at times if they complain beyond the alloted 20 minutes, that seems fair and it works well, i suggest perhaps putting this into the bca rulebook. by the way, does anyone know what "hijole! este pinche gringo" means??![]()
Jimmy M. said:That's why we play winner racks/breaks, 9 (or 10, playing 10-ball) doesn't count in the bottom two pockets on our tour. There's nothing left to argue about there. If you get a bad rack, you gave it to yourself, and you don't have to worry about your opponent rigging the rack so the 9 or 10 shoots out into the corner.