JB Cases said:
Well it seems to me that if this is the law then it's up to the courts to decide the matter if it comes to that.
I have no dog in this hunt. However as an outside observer it seems a bit premature to have all this speculation (call it mud-slinging) prior to the date the organizers stated that they would begin payments. I am sure that IF the organizers pays everyone as they should then the mud-slingers will say he achieved a last-minute rescue and say that it was their "public" (if AZ Billiards can be said to have influence) pressure that accomplished it. If the organizer fails to pay then the mud-slingers will stand up and say that they were right all along.
From what I gather Philippine politics seems to be pretty cutthroat with little regard for the law. Even at that however it would seem to me that with reports of Senate investigations taking place Yen Makebenta would be foolish to hold an event without adhering to the law governing bonded prize money.
It seems to me that he would know that this event (this year) was not going to make him money personally, not be a profit center for Raya Sports, and certainly would stand as a make-or-break event in light of all the other issues in play. So with all that in mind he would have to be suicidal to hold the event without the money in hand.
Maybe he is but somehow I doubt it. Thus I read all this speculating and mud-slinging with dismay as it further tears apart the billiard world with no reason. If this coming week we don't see that players are getting paid then go to town. Help your fellow pool players to pursue their rights to a payday. But until then - let it be.
Perhaps you call our pre-event posts as mudslinging... mater of semantics. As far as I know, we were basing our posts from the signals, mainly fro the absence of sponsors in the WTB website UNTIL a few days before the event. That occurrence is not our doing. At this point, even if for the fact that obligations have not been met as of this writing, we can go "I told you so".
We were aware that should anything go wrong (at that time, predictably) and we kept quiet about it, any failure would have generalized future Philippine events as inferior. Hence, we made the distinction early in the going.
Actually, if they only listened to us from the onset of the rift, they could have probably avoided a boycott and they could have made a killing in sponsorships. It is not only to the international players that we sent alarm signals to... it was also to them. But the complaints could not send its decibels to the accredited high chair that they were in. It was too late when their constituents decided to bolt out and create a BMPAP.
Only then did they consider negotiating, but it was too late. And when they realized that the BMPAP was a force to reckon with, they decided to counter with black propaganda in text messaging, dailies, AZ columns and official statements. In the forums, they were the first ones who called Perry a pimp and who said that Puyat was using Efren (implying stupidity in Efren). Edwin was the worst hit by local text messaging, so I do not blame him for his toxic postings.
The WTB was a culmination of this strategy that only BSCP/Raya had chosen to live by. Why was it? Makabenta is in the Media, Baranda is a political propagandist by profession, and Chua is a political crony to all sides of Philippine politics - they had the edge in this approach that they selected. They forgot about the foot soldiers and the business side of things.
While Bandido and Sputnik fought issues out in the Internet (usually after breakfast or after a day's work), everyone in BMPAP was working. BMPAP's superior local events said it all. Our forum exchanges made the whole international pool community aware of how things were going on based on facts and events. If it can be called mudslinging, so be it. From our side, it was international sympathy we were after because we thought that it was wiser to work on the Law of Supply and Demand instead of working on a corrupted system of accreditation.
And so the Law of Supply and Demand has spoken. No matter how Ted Learner and the others tried so hard to prop-up the event, it is a fact that the WTB was not embraced by the fans and by sponsors.
Personally, I was all-out mainly against the abuse of accreditation. That was what I fought for in all my postings, especially when our smoke signals were extinguished by no less than Ian Andersen.
Bandido and I stand up with pride in defending the Filipino players. (For example, in the Alex issue, Guinness would probably not have asked Alex back if not for the background that was exposed). Collateral damage is far less important than the lesson that has been offered to international pool:
The sport (especially if ego confuses the self as being the "sport") is not bigger than the players collectively.
Hopefully, our pre-tournament efforts will not be used in regret for what might have been if only they listened to us... IF AND WHEN OBLIGATIONS ARE NOT MET. If obligations are met, well then they ought to be, and shame on them for coming up with this kind of preparation.