I like the new wrapless Cognoscenti. I have one with a leather wrap. Does anyone recomend converting mine to a wrapless. I think I would have to put a new wrap on it then glaze it over?
Putting another wrap on it and clear coating over it is the way to go. Joe would be the best one to do it. If he won't do a hundred others will.
I'd think it would cut the cue's value at least by half.
There are some things you just don't do.
If Mr. Gold wanted that cue to be wrapless, he would have built it that way.
But what about the argument that says, "Hey, it's my cue and I can do anything
I want to with it".
Sir, that may be true but you'll have to find someone else to do it because I won't
touch it. I have a set of ethics and as I said, there are some things that you just don't do.
I may be alone in my thinking but I have my doubts.
It might hurt the resale of the cue a little, but not half like KJ estimated IMO. I pointed him to Joe first and others second if Joe does not work out. Does no one ever keep a cue anymore? I have played with the same cue for over 20 years now. Does it occur to anyone that maybe a customer wants something a certain way and $$ is not the all deciding answer? I was not addressing the resale value. You had already addressed that. I had no reason to repeat what you just told him. I just answered his question.And you don't think it will hurt the re-sale value of the cue, if he decided to sell it, if someone else did it???
I like the new wrapless Cognoscenti. I have one with a leather wrap. Does anyone recomend converting mine to a wrapless. I think I would have to put a new wrap on it then glaze it over?
I would go with Dave's recommend.
Go with a stack wrap. That way you have the feel of a wrap less
and the look of a wrap.
Myself, I would take a stack wrap over leather any day of the week.
Besides, I believe that would be the cheapest of your options.
Stack wrap and Cog ?
Red cloth Centennial table.
OK, let's approach this from a slightly different angle, based on what's been
presented so far.
No one has embraced the concept that this modification will enhance the cue's value.
The consensus seems to be that such a move will actually reduce the cue's value.
Maybe that's a concern to the OP or maybe it's not. Only he can say.
The consensus also suggests that Joe Gold should be the one to do the deed.
I wholeheartedly agree. This would be the only way to maintain legitimacy in the cue.
As Chris has stated, there are hundreds that could and would Meucci-ize this cue.
This, IMO is what would cause this cue's value to tank. We won't know by how much
until the cue hits the secondary market, if it ever does.
If Joe does the work, the cue retains legitimacy (and it's value).
Just for the sake of the conversation, does anyone remember the Black Boar that was
floating around in the F/S section that had been inlaid by someone other than the builder?
That cue and it's legacy speak for themselves and to the prospect of this Cog's possible future.
I don't think it's too far-fetched to imagine this Cog cue experiencing a similar fate.
"Does anyone recomend converting mine to a wrapless.(?)"
IMO, a resounding NO.
Dave is correct. Either sell the cue while it still has it's full market value and
buy the cue you want or, if you can afford two, just buy a wrapless Cog.
Please don't Meucci-ize this cue.
True, in most instances, work that is done can be undone.
I hope he likes it.
It was never about the money.