Latest activity

Latest activity

 Social Media Forum list

New Mike Stacey African Paduak Fullsplice Sneaky Pete Cue--Snug New Cue Value

jazznpool
Stacey2604. 58" straight grained dark African Paduak into maple sneaky pete done South West style with veneer dash deco bands and curly maple stub at the buttsleeve. Mike make's his fullsplice butt blanks which have sharp points on both ends. The pin is brass 3/8-11, flat-face joint. The shaft is 13mm (3.87 oz.) with 3/4" Aegis II ferrule and Kamikaze soft layered tip. The cue weighs 18.94 oz., with a 19-1/8" balance. Black delrin joint protector is set included. $775.00 Goods and PayPal, Visa or MasterCard (Zelle price is $751.75) shipped 3 day UPS in continental United States. No trades or other offers. Sales tax inside California.
Stacey2604a.jpeg

Stacey2604b.jpeg

Stacey2604c.jpeg
Click to expand...

SVB vs Josh Filler announced for Feb 6th at NYC's Amsterdam Billiards

sjm
One thing I found amusing during the challenge matches was that Josh would sometimes let his opponent dictate his pocket for the 9ball, so we got to watch him shooting a few very interesting multi-rail shots. I think most everyone there was more familiar with Shane than with Josh, but Josh endeared himself to the New York City pool fans with his good humor and good sportsmanship.
Click to expand...

Tony/Skyler trivia question

Rocket354
mikepage said:
Your attempt to assign motivation here makes the same mistake that shows up in many responses (both here and on Facebook) to the original question.

In the Tony/Sky case, the fact that we’re asking the question is itself evidence. If the data were typical or aligned with baseline expectations, there would be no question. Answering as if it were asked at random ignores that conditioning. (Some of you—like sixpack and skogstokig—are getting this.)

The same applies to FargoRate’s choices. The fact that we don’t split 7-ft and 9-ft ratings is itself evidence. If our goal were, as you suggest, short-term engagement or revenue, splitting them would be the obvious, economically superior move. We would get far more engagement by giving people what they think they want. The fact that we don’t do that is important evidence of something.

In both cases, the error is the same: ignoring the selection mechanism that produced the question and the policy, and treating highly informative behavior as if it carried no information at all.
Click to expand...
Wow you are pompous and condescending.

You already provide the ability to split 7' and 9' in your own app. Although, admittedly, most reported games don't seem to have that distinction marked.
Click to expand...
Load more

Filter

Back
Top